Commodification In Ed Kienholz's For The Love Of God

Improved Essays
Commodification is the process by which material objects are turned into marketable goods with monetary value based on equivalent commodities. In relation, the Marx idea of commodity fetishism is related to this by which all value is derived from an abstract unknowable meaning, and the original meaning or use is absolutely gone.

Commodification is evident Ed Kienholz’s watercolor artworks. In exchange for a service or material possession, he would offer a watercolor painting as payment. He was able to achieve this by having enough fame that artwork was considered valueable. This wouldn’t have worked if his paintings didn’t have an equivelnet value.
Damien Hirst’s sculpture For the Love of God (2006) is an example of commodity fetishism.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tim Gautreaux's The Safe

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In today’s culture and society, many people will most likely value an expensive car over an ancient artifact. In other words, artistic objects with valuable meanings are less appealing than exotic goods or products to the average person. The short story The Safe, written by Tim Gautreaux demonstrates a situation in which a few workers in a junkyard discover a safe with a fancy sewing machine inside of it. With the exception of one character, Alva, the rest of them find objects with physical value more appealing than ones with artistic and sentimental value. After being exposed to the sewing machine, Alva, Snyder, and Little Dickie develop their own sense of imagination and recognize the importance of sentimental value, which is exemplified…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In What Money Can’t Buy, Michale J. Sandel asks reader where this distinction is made: which products can be bought and sold morally. It is a question that seems simple, but tears at the heart of what economics is. We’ve all been told “money can’t buy happiness”, but with new things being up for sale like the right to skip a line or use the HOV lane, it is becoming quite clear that it can. This raises one question: should it? What Money Can’t Buy by Michael Sandel argues that the market triumphalism of the 1980s and 1990s spread market economics into places it didn 't belong, resulting in a demoralization of many goods and…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael J. Sandel’s article “What Isn’t for Sale?” he introduces his argument that markets have taken over our lives. Which is a problem because now markets have no limits. There is no boundary between markets and morals. Markets can put anything for sale, and we (the consumers) have no choice but to buy it.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sort of ascribed value is exemplified best in jewelry. The price you pay for a jewel is an arbitrary one, set only by the price you’re willing to pay.” “Have you ever asked yourself what cretin invented paperwork? Surely, they weren’t sane, right? Exaggerated as this might seem, American office workers may attest that to the hours spent each day in monotonous file.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In response to the massive surplus of babies in the 30s and 40s, the youth flourished in the 1950’s. The age of conformity kicked in as students dressed the same, listened to the same rock-and-roll music and even thought in unison (very few rebellions/war-like events). Along with the growing youth, the American Market expanded throughout the world and placed the U.S. into the highest ranking for the years to come. During the 1950’s, the Cold War was evident and many people, who were proposed to be communists, were expelled from American society.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The measure of our value is based on material things. Because of this belief that society has engraved in our brains, we all wait for the next best thing to come around. The only thing we want to do is consume, consume, consume. And we don’t consume based on need; we consume because that’s what everyone else is doing.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Book Thief By Tonisha

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tonisha's book was a moderate success. Many people were skeptical of her work and considered her a fraud. It didn't help that she was very unsuccessful in teaching others her skills, made worse by her bizzare thought processes. As a follow up to her book, Tonisha transitioned her focus from human behaviour to the apprasial of objectes of interest.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Yours is Yours, Mine is Better People live in a world where change is happening faster than before. There are always new trends and discoveries. An example is the recent video that was uploaded by a teenager about his best friends’ everyday clothes and shoes and saying “damn Daniel” and “damn Daniel, back at it again with the white vans” became viral on the internet. After this a lot of people have made their own versions of this video.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The essay “Women on the Market” by Luce Irigaray makes a comparison between women’s value and Marx’s analysis of capitalism. As in my previous responses, I try to tie up our weekly readings to our secondary readings. In this case, Frankenstein is the novel that kept coming back to my mind while reading Irigaray’s essay. The value of the main woman character in this novel, Elizabeth, only comes to light when compared to the Monster, because they are both seen as comparable tradable goods. Thus, commodity here is applied to people not just inanimate items.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith states that, “No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable.” Smith is meaning that not every society is fair; there will be people who are “flourishing and happy” and some of the people will be “poor and miserable.” It is very difficult to have a society in which every person is happy. There is a large gap between the rich and the poor in America. The rich makes up one percent of America’s population.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Marx and Marcel Mauss were particularly attentive to this feature. They were aware of how the fetishism of money, its apparent ability to render all items comparable, fuels inequality. It is not the process of exchange in itself that renders things equal. Rather it is the reduction in exchange to an abstract common unit. This supposed one dimensionality of value posits that all things can be assessed by a total of said units, such that their reasons for existence must be justified accordingly.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He points out that gold, as an example, once entered in the process of exchange, is perceived by both of its values (as previously discussed, there are two types of values). Gold is seen by its use value as a metal, but also by its “embodiment of value” (Chapter 1, p.114) as a form of currency.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflicting Views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx on the Division of Labor and the Role of Money in Exchange In their works, Adam Smith and Karl Marx prove to have differing opinions on money and the division of labor. Although they understand money as a representation of value and as a medium of exchange, they arrive at different conclusions about the role of money in social life. Smith sees the division of labor as a constructive system and a means of furthering exchange, leading to the use of money. Marx, on the other hand, finds labor to turn human beings into alienated workers, and the division of labor to spread and increase this concept.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Treadmill Of Consumption by James A. Roberts refers to the consumption of substantial goods in which people believe they will become happier just by acquiring enhanced material goods. People over consume and are never convinced with what they already have but, rather aim for more and considerable possessions. Under the Treadmill Of Consumption people grow into very competitive as well as rapacious and have the urgency to over consume in order to feel gratified. We no longer look at value as a virtue, but as a substitute we examine one’s goods to interpret their significance. James A. Roberts does an extravagant job justifying the Treadmill Of Consumption by conducting research, using relatable life controversy as well as quoting authorities.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx Uses Value Duality

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Marx there are always two things going on simultaneously in the capitalist mode of production. There are three different duality components. The first component, the duality of use value and value is where the rest of the components derive from. Use value is the intrinsic component to a commodity that it has been predisposed to. It is a qualitative value because it consists of the specific qualities that the commodity has and since each commodity has different use-values one use-value cannot be like the other.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays