Juror number three to me was very irrational with his thought process of convicting the boy of his guiltiness. I felt as though he thought the problems he had with his son were the same that this father and son had. Nonetheless this is not the case. The way he described he and his son’s relationship, made me believe that he was pushing his son into being someone that he wasn’t. The juror not only wanted his son to live in the same mindset as him, but he wanted his son to be him. However, it is known that one cannot force another human being into someone they are not and I think the juror finally realized that, enraging him. This could have possibly led to him pushing his son away, not even having realized it. The juror blames this broken relationship
