Boy Killed His Father Evidence

The case against the boy killing his father is very easy to me. I know without a doubt that the kid is not guilty because of evidence regarding the stab wound, eye witness of the crime through train, and finally the old man’s faulty testimony. The first piece of evidence is how the stab wound couldn't have been from the boy, the second piece of evidence is that the lady couldn't have seen the killing clearly, and the third piece of evidence is how the old man fabricated his testimony.

The first piece of evidence I will be discussing is the stab wound on the father. The mortician himself said that the the father was stabbed from a downward angle. There’s nothing out of the ordinary with that right? Wrong, the boy couldn’t have stabbed the father from a downward angle because the boy was shorter than the father. Either the boy stabs at an awkward angle or it wasn't him. Not to mention it may not have been the same knife the boy claims to have lost, i say this because someone in the jury had a nearly identical knife thus proving it may not have been the knife the boy bought and lost the same day. This proves that the stab wound couldn’t have been from the boy. …show more content…
Her testimony nearly caused the boy his life and she should be put in jail. She said she saw the boy kill his father but in reality she didn’t have her glasses because she was in bed, and we know she wears glasses because we saw her with some in court today anyway and she was in her bed looking through a train without glasses and then she claims to have clearly seen it. At most she saw a blurry blob stab another blurry blob. That is all I have to say and unlike her I CAN CLEARLY SEE this boy is not