Argumentative Essay On Gay Marriage

Improved Essays
GAY MARRIAGE

In 1973 Maryland became the first state to ban same-sex marriage. In 1996 27% disagreed to

make it legal, compared to 2015, 60% agreed it was right. (Bush) On May 17, 2004, Tanya McCloskey

and Marcia Kadish were the first legal gay marriage to happen in the United States (Alan Cooperman,

Jonathan Finer, Fred Barbash). On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court passed the law that the US

Constitution in all 50 states allows same-sex marriage. Before same-sex marriage was completely ruled

to be allowed in all 50 states, 38 states had it to be legal, 12 did not. Of course there is always two sides

to each debate, you’re against it or for it. Supreme court had a to have a good reason to allow gay

marriage in all 50 states,
…show more content…
President Obama says it would strengthen all communities by offering dignity and equality

to all same-sex couples and their families. (Chappell)

What does the future hold for same sex marriage? We get a new president in 2016, it could all

change in the matter of one opinion, and each state could see bad things in same sex marriage. Supreme

Court could lose members that were in favor of it, then gain ones that find it bad. Although don’t take it

into completely getting shut out, it maybe just certain states. Say those 38 states keep it legal and the

other 12 still believed to keep it illegal. As those 12 states could take each marriage license away, make

the same sex relationships renew their license in a different state, more money and work. Even bringing

the consideration of “oh I don’t want to live in the United States they don’t believe in our
…show more content…
(Freedom

to Marry ) Although out of the twenty one, Finland signed in 2015 but doesn’t come effective till 2017. If

we do receive another democrat as president, no worries of the gay marriage changing to illegal again in

certain states. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform states say they support all of the rights all families

should have equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the laws. They support marriage

equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under law for same sex couples.

(Republicanviews) If we do have another Republican for president doesn’t necessarily mean the law will

change. In 2004, President Bush stated, “in our country marriage has been defined at the state level for

200 years and we believe I should continue to be there.” Republicans and Democrats have many

different views. If the Supreme Court did have the law come up again to vote and made it illegal it may

change again after 8 year term is over, this law could go back and forth for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plessy V. Ferguson Summary

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. What is the name of the case? Hollingsworth v. Perry a) What is the name held by the petitioner in this case? Summarize the petitioner’s key argument. Dennis Hollingsworth et al. with Charles J. Cooper speaking for the petitioners.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Explain the Civil Rights Acts. United States courts and legislatures have a reciprocal reliance with each other. In order for a legislature to act, it requires constitutional authority. While courts require legislative/administrative support to utilize court orders and target political support.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What would someone do if one’s better half had to be separated by law because of the state they lived in? Richard Loving and his “colored” wife Mildred had to go through that same situation when they lived in their home in the state of Virginia while illegally being married. After being kicked out of their home state, Richard and Mildred decided to take their issue to the Supreme Court and later their story becomes an inspirational documentary. While there are many stories out there about illegal intermarriage and its impact on the people, The Lovings act of civil disobedience in illegal marriage played a crucial role in ending the prohibition in interracial marriage in America. Richard and Mildred Loving lived a simple country life in their home state of Virginia.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Abortion Case Study

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On Friday, June 19, a federal appeals court upheld their decision to implement new restrictions and mandates on Texas abortion locations that will take effect on July 1. The court previously ruled that abortion providers in Texas could be held to hospital-like standards, which would effectively close the majority of abortion clinics in Texas. The reason for the denial of reversal was that the court did not believe the law placed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The attorneys of abortion providers asked the court to hold off on the implementation of the new law in order for them to begin the appeal process to the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At that exact moment, American law changed perpetually to include homosexual marriage as a civil…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A big thing is that the couple gets their marital benefits. When a couple gets married they get many great benefits that a single person wouldn’t get, so a homosexual would say this was fair to them. Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. (1) People want to believe that they can love the people that they want to love, not the people that they legally have too.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The chapter titled “Saving Marriage by Banning Marriage” uses structural-functionalist theory. This theory “sees society as a structure with interrelated parts designed to meet the biological and social needs of the individuals in that society” (Lumen). One of the parts that works together with the others is religion. This fits the study because religion is a main influence on the voters’ opinions in this study. The whole chapter was based around the Christian Right.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Plessy v. Ferguson Cite: 163 U.S. 537 (1896) Vote: 7-1 Opinion: Brown Facts: • In 1890 Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act. o Required different cars for blacks and whites on railroads. • A group of citizens formed Comité des Citoyens in order to repeal and/or fight the laws effect.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is another law that was passed six months after it was ruled that banning same sex couples was unconstitutional, and it was called Proposition 8. Same sex couples are trying to get “the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional” (Jost). These laws cause a constant race to create and destroy laws; that deal with the ability for same sex couples to get married and for the people who believe that same sex marriage is wrong to refuse that…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Same-sex marriage is not only disruptive to the societal order, it also disrupts the Constitution. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was an amendment to the Constitution…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays