Obergefell V. Hodges Supreme Court Case Analysis

Improved Essays
The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional. The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States clearly states that the laws of the country protect all citizens equally. This amendment extends the right to marriage to same-sex couples. The fight for gay rights did not begin in the twenty-first century, but can …show more content…
Meaning that power is divided between the national and state governments. Each have specific powers which the other cannot change or override. States not in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage claimed that the national government did not have the authority to overrule their laws. Nullification is “the historical idea that states can ignore federal laws, or pass laws that supersede them” (Graham) these states tried to nullify the Supreme Courts decision. Public officials in many states such as Ted Cruz support the idea that the Supreme Court’s ruling is not in fact the law of the land. While being interviewed by National Public Radio, Cruz commented on the Supreme Court decision, “They cannot ignore a direct judicial order. The parties to a case cannot ignore a direct judicial order. But it does not mean that those who are not parties to case are bound by a judicial order …” (Graham). Contrary to the statement made by Ted Cruz, the Supremacy Clause in the United States Constitution says that the constitution has authority over state laws, it has “ultimate authority in the U.S.” (Graham). If it is written in the Constitution, then the states cannot make laws against it or blatantly ignore the decision …show more content…
No one citizen is lesser than in the eyes of the law. Written on July 9, 1868, the amendment was originally meant to protect the rights of black citizens. After the civil war Jim Crow laws caused the segregation of blacks in public places, such as movie theaters and bathrooms. The amendment was made to push southern and boarder states in a segregation free direction. Although, it was mostly written for this purpose, the amendment gave all citizens equal protection under the law, this includes same-sex couples. Race or sexual orientation cannot affect a persons rights and protections under the law, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws” (Cornell). Treating an individual or a group of people unfairly would be a direct violation of the United States

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the case of the Supreme Court vs. the Affordable Healthcare Act, “The [Healthcare Act] require[d] that certain individuals pay a financial penalty for not obtaining health insurance [because it can be] reasonably characterized as a tax because the Constitution permits such a tax...” (Liptak, 2012). The Affordable Healthcare Act hinged on an interpretation of the Commerce and Taxation clause of the Constitution. Chief Roberts used this clause as a way to explain how the Constitution permits a tax to be passed because of Congress’s power to regulate taxes found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1. The 14th Amendment after much iteration passed through Congress and was adopted on July 9th, 1868; it helped overrule the Supreme Court’s 1857 Dred Scott decision that prohibited blacks from being or becoming American citizens. With this overrule the 14th amendment was used to guarantee that everyone—no matter the color of their skin—had the right to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” In more recent years, the 14th amendment was brought into play in the case of Same-Sex Marriages. The Supreme Court drew its ruling from the fact that the 14th Amendment allows everyone to enjoy the privileges of American citizenship—including marriage—without legislated discrimination against their orientation. The majority…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens.[ Obergefell v. Hodges. (n.d.). Oyez.] The 14th Amendment is commonly known as an amendment that provides ‘equal protection of the laws.’[ 14th Amendment. (n.d.). Cornell University.] The case was first granted by the Supreme Court on January 16, 2015; Argued starting April 28,anything else. 2015; and decided June 26, 2015. The decision fell in favour for Obergefell with a 5 to 4 decision by the Supreme Court. In the article cited, it is stated that, “Because there are no differences between a same-sex union and an opposite-sex union with respect to these principles [building a home and raising children] the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”[ Obergefell…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hodges and Loving v. Virginia that were similar. In both cases the petitioners traveled out of state to marry. Upon returning, they were both deprived of their personal liberties. Although the liberty is different specifically, both were charged under the Due Process Clause. Both their states were depriving them of either justice or discrimination, which in return is why both petitioners in each case fought back against their state to fight for their rights. The case of Loving v. Virginia changed what the concept of marriage was. Marriage was first between a man and a woman of the same race. That is what marriage stood for in the early years, no interchanging races. However with this case, interracial marriage became legal. What was once forbidden and different became normal. This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This has produced both exceptional and atrocious ruling, but it is an ongoing battle for which is correct for the case and for the time. Considering that the Supreme Court makes the final decision and arguably affects our Constitution in the most massive way, this battle is very decisive in how our country is run. Judicial restraint and activism produce two very different, sometimes contrary rulings both with constitutional backing and reasoning. Neither one is better than the other, but the way they affect us provides a very telling story of how our government is and how our society is as a whole. For example the same sex marriage movement of the last year would’ve been ruled very differently fifteen or twenty years ago, due to the fact the courts were more Originalists and since nothing in the Constitution states the federal government 's power to regulate marriage. They would’ve used the 10th amendment to validate their ruling forever leaving it within the individual state’s legislatures to make the decision. These interpretations make our country, our civil liberties, and our civil rights. Both have been used throughout the history of our country and have…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Virginia case. Obergefell V. Hodges was another case involving the law restricting marriage. Instead of race, however, it was sexual orientation. The Supreme Court decision ruled in favor of gay marriage and made it legal in all fifty states, but there was not the same unanimous decision of the justices as in Loving V. Virginia. Although in Loving V. Virginia all the supreme justices voted in one way, much of the public was in disagreement, especially in the South. The fourteenth amendment protected the marriage rights of both interracial and homosexual couples and would most likely do the same if another issue relating to equal protection in marriage made it to the Supreme…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas. The minority believed that the Supreme Court decision short circuited…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Obergefell v. Hodges will be a case that is remembered throughout history. Some will celebrate the right to marriage while others wonder is the case should have even been heard by the courts. Whatever the stance on the issue, this case will be just as significant as cases such as Roe v. Wade. Those who debate the case will use examples such as civil liberties, privacy, discrimination, equality and the list goes on. Those who opposed the decision do not see it as a privacy issue and in some cases not even a religious issue. To many it was seen as the judiciary branch overstepping their bounds and taking away the power of the states given by the constitution. The Supreme Court Justices were just as torn on their opinions as well.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On June 26, 2015 the United States Justices decided on a pivotal case in American history. In a close 5-4 vote the Justices deemed that same-sex marriage was constitutional via the 14th amendment. The Obergefell et al. v. Hodges case was the finality of a slow evolving progression for same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges). This landmark decision allowed same-sex marriage to be legal in the United States. After this decision same-sex couples rushed to their nearest marriage clerk to solidify their relationship in marriage. Same-sex marriage licenses were being distributed at a rapid rate all throughout America, except in Rowan County, Kentucky. Standing on her 1st amendment civil liberty to have freedom to practice and exercise her religion,…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Windsor led, many states to legalize same-sex marriage. This set the stage for Obergefell v. Hodges. On June 26, 2013, The Supreme Court struck down The Defense of Marriage Act. They ruled that legally married same-sex couples are entitled to receive equal treatment under the federal law. The ruling required that the federal benefits for legally married opposite-couples, for example Social Security, certain tax breaks and insurance benefits. These then would be extended to legally married same-sex couples. In the Defense of Marriage Act it stated a federal definition of marriage as one man and one women also to defend marriage from being redefined or expanded. In the court’s ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy and four other justices thought the DOMA went against the fifth amendment in the constitution.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays