Galilei Persuasion Analysis

Persuasion relies on means of communication that influences beliefs, attitudes, and values. Philosophers throughout the course of history have encountered many dilemmas involving such. Galileo Galilei, an Italian philosopher is a prime example of a man who faced resistance in his act of persuasion. Considering his background, Galileo’s agenda was to argue the value of the Bible against the many discoveries of science. His pro science position, created a discrepancy amongst the people. Showing that his goals to persuade others with science seemed small compared to the Bible. In all honestly, Galileo was a man with knowledge and wit, but it is common to be a man with multiple fallacies. Ironically, these fallacies within Galileo, are …show more content…
Intended for persuasion the Bible has done exactly that. Unfortunately, it has come to the point where it is “preferred over that of all human writings.” This reaction has made it a difficult task for new theories to surface and transcend to towns and countries. Often, resulting into ideas similar to Galilei’s to be viewed as insignificant. But Galilei acknowledges this and makes a point where he states something along these lines, faith does not mean you are doing the right thing. The bible does not clarify everyone of Earth 's features, it is open to our discoveries. As God “endowed us with senses, reason and intellect” using these skills are crucial. Which leaves Galilei with this statement “the intention of the Holy Ghost is to teach how one goes to heaven. not how heaven goes.” Open to interpretation, this is where the quote leaves us. Similar to how Galilei states that the Bible is open for the speaker and his interpretation. Although that “Divine inspiration” is not clarified, it is always open for the audience to agree or disagree. This being an important role in decision making, leaves science in a reliable position where the facts are explained and expressed. Leaving “Divine inspirations” out of all