From Creation Story To The Big Bang Theory By Paul Davies

Improved Essays
The study and understanding of physics, both classical and modern physics, are often difficult and sometimes, impossible to explain. Often times, the curious mind is told an answer that provokes three more questions than they had before. The ever growing questions about the universe all those who study physics have been brought about by both the expansive and incomprehensible size of our universe and the inability of the human brain to fully comprehend the world around us. Philosophers and scientists alike have spent years attempting to provide answers but have been incapable of finding the truth. Paul Davies is a famous physicist, microbiologist, and cosmologist who works at Arizona State University. His dedication and belief that science and religion are interconnected allow him to lead the pioneering Beyond …show more content…
Paul Davies begins the discussion in his book addressing an idea that pertains to the rest of the book saying, “If we do discover a complete theory. . . If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason —for then we would truly know the mind of God.” This statement allows the reader to understand the connection between the possibility of a God and his connection to the world we live on. He opens his book addressing many interesting topics revolving around the basis of beliefs and how beliefs are formed. Davies does distinguish that there is a difference from a belief centered around truth and beliefs that are so incoherent they cannot be true. He addresses the desire of ancient Greek philosophers 2000 years ago to make sense of how the world began. Now, there is no complete theory or set of beliefs or set of facts that can dictate to us why we are here. Paul Davies seeks to use the theories and concepts from scientists like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and Stephen Hawking to explain the world around

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He envisioned the infinite potential for mankind to work with any and all genomes. This most certainly is the start of a new theory. Whatever that theory may have huge potential for good but it can also have great potential for bad also. The idea of starting a new theory reminds me of Leonard and Sheldon from Big Bang Theory.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Principle of Indeterminacy turned science inside out. Suddenly determinism goes, causality goes, and we are left with a universe composed of what Eddington calls, ‘mind-stuff.’ Listen to these physicists: Sir James Jeans, Eddington's successor, invokes ‘fate,’ saying that the future "may rest on the knees of whatever gods there be." Three world-famous physicians to demonstrate the dramatic effect the Principle of Indeterminacy had on those people who were intelligent enough to follow its logic. Eddington said the world was composed of "'mind stuff '" and that we now have “'no clear distinction between the Natural and the Supernatural'”; Sir James Jeans "invokes 'fate, I saying that the future 'may rest on the knees of whatever gods there…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hawking continues to ask further questions such as, “Why should anything we say have validity?” (910), and “If everything is determined, what becomes of free will and our responsibility for our actions?” (914). Each he answers in a technical way to work towards his…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This past Thursday we were placed into groups and asked to read Alan Lightman’s essay What Came Before the Big Bang. The Big Bang happened some fourteen billion years ago as a state of infinitesimally dense and small, superheated ball of matter, which has been expanding ever since. And as far as we know, the universe will keep expanding forever. What scientists are trying to figure out is if there was anything before the Big Bang, essentially, they are trying to figure out if time had existed before the creation of the Big Bang.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy has been plagued with the subject of religion since the dawn of time. Each philosopher having their own opinions, many attempts have been made to prove and disprove their opinion and the opinions of others. The existence of God, a single, supreme being who created the heavens and the earth, is a controversial topic, but even among those who believe in the existence of God, finding a way to explain such existence has been nigh impossible. An 18th century philosopher, David Hume attempted to establish his opinion on the existence of God by critiquing the widely accepted ideals set forth by Descartes.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm's Argument Analysis

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To provide an argument to justify that one’s beliefs are true beyond a shadow of a doubt can be a process in which faces many challenges. There must be a thorough unbiased investigation of what is trying to be discovered or verified which can often lead to one’s conjecture. There are many phenomenon in this world that would prove challenging to explain, and one of those things is the existence of a god. Throughout the history of humanity, there have been many speculations on this topic in particular, which has seemed to point towards many different possibilities. Saint Anselm provides a controversial argument for the rationalization of god’s existence, which requires a thorough analysis.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Many people would agree that there appears to be a contradiction between a loving God and the reality of evil. The attempt to answer these difficult contradictions is referred to as a theodicy. The great Christian thinker of our time, C. S. Lewis, wrote as an atheist after his beloved wife died, “meanwhile where is God?…

    • 2424 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although the arguments set forth by these philosophers are considered the “most complete, forceful, and cogent presentation of the Cosmological Argument we possess,” there were skeptics that challenged the philosophers’ reasoning (Rowe 51). In particular, philosopher David Hume read the argument and attacked virtually every premise that was set forth. Humes divides his arguments into three main ideas, but focusing on his first and more prominent argument, Humes attacks the way the Cosmological Argument is structured. As stated, the Cosmological Argument creates the impression that there has to be a reason for everything, but Humes criticizes this reasoning by stating that existent beings do not need to have a reason or even a cause for their existence. For example, visualize a set of dominoes standing up that is ordered in a straight line.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will explain the rationale of the cosmological argument and it’s objections as presented by Hume in the Dialogues Concering Natural Religion. My conclusion is that the cosmological argument ultimately fails to prove the existence of a self-caused being. I will show that is unreasonable to claim that there need be an explanation for the whole infinite series of a cause and effect chain. The character Demea primarily says that everything has a reason and utilizes this fundamental claim to prove the existence of a deity.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, two of the most used type of philosophical arguments is further explored. The first one is known as cosmological arguments which begins by stating obvious fact that there are contingently existing things, and it ends with the conclusion that the existence of a cause with power as explanation for the existing things (Zeyl, 2005). In other words, in its simplest form cosmological argument is an attempt that tries to answer the question “why is there something rather than nothing?” (Zeyl, 2005). Many philosophers from Aristotle to several medieval Islamic authors and middle age thinkers such as John Locke, Samuel Clarke, and David Hume have used cosmological argument in their philosophy (Zeyl, 2005).…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The theory of relativity suggests there to be a limitless amount of existences. 6). The "Stone Tape…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays