The second option is there is free will to choose within life; however, ones choices are limited by their abilities and means to achieve their choice. The author then went on to discuss the idea of moral responsibility and choices within videogames in relation to Frankfurt’s compatibilism theory. The author concluded the article by stating “when we identify with some action, whether it is virtual or not, and thus when that action becomes part of our sense of self, it is our own actual moral psychology that is being employed.” I found this article to be very interesting and it was obvious throughout the article that the author was trying to make a point about the potential link between the moral choices made within video games and the moral choices a person will make in the real world. This is demonstrated in many places from her discussion on the relationship between real world violence in comparison to virtual violence and her interpretation of Frankfurt’s
The second option is there is free will to choose within life; however, ones choices are limited by their abilities and means to achieve their choice. The author then went on to discuss the idea of moral responsibility and choices within videogames in relation to Frankfurt’s compatibilism theory. The author concluded the article by stating “when we identify with some action, whether it is virtual or not, and thus when that action becomes part of our sense of self, it is our own actual moral psychology that is being employed.” I found this article to be very interesting and it was obvious throughout the article that the author was trying to make a point about the potential link between the moral choices made within video games and the moral choices a person will make in the real world. This is demonstrated in many places from her discussion on the relationship between real world violence in comparison to virtual violence and her interpretation of Frankfurt’s