Free Will: Hard Determinism

Improved Essays
When it comes to the question of free will, I would have to say I am a hard determinist. I once thought that we had a choice, but these choices were decided by our world. I had some understanding of this idea without searching out an answer to describe it as hard determinism. The universe has it's own natural processes that we understand through chemistry, physics, math, and other fields of study. These processes have a cause and effect relationship, so they influence our environment, which leads to determined factors. Everything is an unbroken chain of events, and the present is the result of what came before. All our thoughts, actions, and our whole lives are governed by this sequence of events. As I am writing this paper my actions come …show more content…
Some reasons I don't believe in god because of the problem of evil existing, and the lack of scientific proof. I think our discusions on Richard Swinburne still has faults, and the other "proofs" for God are not proof so much as good ideas. Since I look for answers with proof, science became my solution to mmy questions. Science lead me to the incomplete idea that everything is determind because of natural laws and states. Thus it wasn't hard to belive in hard determinism, and it didn't change lack of belief in …show more content…
This comes down to moral codes and your responsibility. Some believe that their morals are spiritual and come from God, but I think differently. I have my own morals, but I don't believe, and I'm not going out committing horrible acts. Some would say that I still have them because of God even if I don't believe. I would then like to point out my eariler examples for being an atheiest to show why that isn't true. Then I would say that because morals are mental and emotional states, which like the example of eariler are ultimately part of the physical world. I will admit I am still thinking about whether we are morally responsible, and may make a better arguement in the future. With that out of the way, I currently believe that you are not morally accountable for your actions, but are still punished because of the cause and effect part of our world. We live in society where humans set up laws, and by breaking one you are subject to punishment. Not that you may deserve or could help what you have done, but it's a result of the unbroken chain of events that a law was extablished after or as a precaution to unwanted behavior. So as to how someone should act while alive, I would say that we have determined morals and lack responsiblity for those actions, but are still affected by how the world works. Again I will be revisting this idea for the rest of the class or even longer, but I do like to revise and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Those who believe in this idea are called “hard” determinists, which they deem no one is responsible for their actions. However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holbach’s View on Free Will Paul Holbach was a French philosopher who is a hard determinist meaning that he believes determinism is true, and if determinism is true then you cannot have free will, therefore free will does not exist. In Paul Holbach 's “The Illusion of Free Will,” he argues that people don’t have any free will and that nature determines every human’s actions and will. Free will is the ability for one to perform an action without any outside force influencing them and to be able to be morally responsible for that action. Determinism is the belief where people’s actions and wills are caused by an external force rather their own will meaning no one can be held morally responsible for the outcome for that action. The dilemma of…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Minority Report Questions

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To make an action moral would of course be the opposite of committing a crime and causes no hurt to another person. Just like with the pre-cogs predicting the future of people committing crimes before they happen. That makes moral people immoral before they understand why they have made that choice. 2. Under what circumstances should you be held morally accountable for your actions?…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rue 4 de Vaurobel, a six story townhome, where an innocent sixteen year old girl’s free will is robbed right from her. All the Light We Cannot See, by Anthony Doerr, juxtaposes two very complex and different stories; a blind adolescent girl who is trying to find her way in a new environment and an obedient teenage boy who turns soldier after learning how to configure radios. Marie-Laure and Werner’s story are from two utterly contrasting ends of the spectrum but connect during the same time period. The definition of free will is stated as the power of acting without the restraint of necessity or fate. Marie-Laure LeBlanc has limited free will which has been developed thus far in the novel, described through two major characteristics:…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first glance it seems obvious that humans have free will. For example, if someone chooses chocolate ice cream over vanilla, it seems intuitive that they made that choice. Determinists, however, raise doubt into whether free will exists. A determinist believes that everything that happens in the universe is predetermined and can 't be changed. According to the determinist, an omniscient being would be able to predict everything that will ever happen just from the current state of the universe.…

    • 2224 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atheists have morals without a god. Atheists have obligations to follow morals. According to Louise M. Antony in the article “Good Minus God,” “Atheism is the view that the only kind of “obligation” there could possibly be is the kind that is disciplined by promise of reward or threat of punishment.” Atheists follow beliefs that are very similar to those of theists because many of the human laws follow theistic beliefs. Atheists have the incentive to follow these laws because if they don’t, they have the fear of being punished for it.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have also agreed on punishments or responses when a person breaks one or more of the laws. If we, as a society agree in punishment for breaking laws, then we, as a society must believe in free will. Humans must have free will or we are punishing people for actions for which they had no control. There cannot be moral responsibility if everything is determined, as the responsibility would not fall on the human, but rather the force that made the predetermination.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is free will compatible with determinism? That’s the most philosophical question asked. Free will is the power or ability to make a choice for which one can be held responsible for. Determinism is the thesis that at any time the universe has one physically possibility in the future. Compatibilisim is the thesis that we can have free will in a deterministic world.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophical question of free will has been debated for years and has spawned many theories, papers and never ending arguments. Soft determinism along side with hard determinism and libertarianism make up the three theories of free will. By focusing on the works of Stace and Cahn, I aim to prove that the idea of soft determinism is not an inherently flawed argument and that free will and determinism are compatible. In the argument of free will, soft determinism falls in the middle between hard determinism and libertarianism.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A large and important topic in philosophy is the idea of what us, as humans, are in control of throughout our lives. Are we in control of every moment in our life, or is our life completely mapped out for us. This question leads us to two critical terms used by philosophers, free will and determinism. I will analyze these two theories and discuss different viewpoints that philosophers have regarding free will and determinism. I will explain how they interact with one another in an attempt to confirm my belief that yes, we have free will even if determinism is true.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I also feel that we should be held accountable for our actions, at all times. God has given us free will to make our own decisions. So that we do not feel controlled by him, as he wants us to love him freely and…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion answered these questions with make-believe stories of gods and goddesses and other ‘supernatural forces’ beyond human understanding. Science is able to explain these ‘supernatural forces’ with proof and evidence. Science and religion have always been at war. Science is based on observation and what we can explain using formulae and theorem. Religious arguments on the other hand, are questionable in nature and require faith.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who are believers put their faith in the Lord, and there is a reason why they do it. A person, who lacks in faith or deny God’s existence, can still find comfort in the practice of religion. Logic plays a big role in the conversation between faith and reason, where the…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays