Why Do Atheists Follow Morals Without God?

Improved Essays
Morals Without God
There are many theists in the world, whether they be Christian or Islamic, but they all believe in some form of god. Whether it be Allah or Ra, they still follow a “moral code of conduct,” instructed to them by the divine. Atheists are harassed by theists, trying to denounce that the atheists are a cruel people because they don’t have a god to set morals for them. However, atheists set morals based on those around them, and basic human principles. Atheists have morals without a god. Atheists have obligations to follow morals. According to Louise M. Antony in the article “Good Minus God,” “Atheism is the view that the only kind of “obligation” there could possibly be is the kind that is disciplined by promise of reward or threat of punishment.” Atheists follow beliefs that are very similar to those of theists because many of the human laws follow theistic beliefs. Atheists have the incentive to follow these laws because if they don’t, they have the fear of being punished for it. Over time, this moral set of beliefs have become ingrained in human society that atheists think it common sense to follow these, and don’t require an incentive to do so. This implies that over time, atheists have adapted their moral
…show more content…
In reality, nihilists know right from wrong just as much as theists do. According to the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, nihilism is “The belief that all values are baseless and that nothing can be known or communicated,” whereas atheists are described as “A person who does not believe that God or a divine being exists.” Nihilists are the ones who find no meaning in life, whereas atheists just don’t believe in an existence of a divine being. Nihilists are the vocal minority of atheism. Nihilists are the ones that will commit what theists consider injustices, because they can’t find a purpose, whereas atheists know what they are and aren’t supposed to do, and follow

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    For example the Finneyites thoughts, “history was made by morally accountable human beings” (8). All of the religions of that time sought for perfection. In the Female Missionary Society exhorted that, “The poor did not need handouts. They needed preaching, moral instruction, and the spiritual support of godly friends” (22). Pierson accredited his business achievements to ,” the moral code he had learned on his father’s farm” (19).…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, if we were not believers, this interpretation would allow us to recognize the basic moral principles in our human nature. Thus, I believe that this argument allows a broad recognition of moral principles that moral in human…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2015, Phil Zuckerman from The Los Angeles Times wrote an article, “How secular family values stack up”. In his article, he claims that more children are “growing up godless” than at any other time in our nation’s history. Phil Zuckerman provides credibility, sufficiency, warrants and reasoning all within his article. The argument being made is whether children need to be raised with religion or not. Phil uses his own research and multiple outside sources to help support his claim.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the "The Scarlet Letter" and "The Crucible," both authors Nathaniel Hawthorne and Arthur Miller argues that one 's individual conscience should take precedence over the rules of one 's religion. For short, a person should follow their own beliefs and conscience thoughts before following their religious virtues. Both authors show evidence that supports their claim in their novels by using Pathos. By using pathos, both authors ' were even able to convince me into agreeing with their statement.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One particular debate that has bedeviled humanity since its inception is the question of the nature of human morality. We as humans argue about the source of morality: most religious fundamentalists argue that morality comes from a deity, whereas secularists tend to argue that morality comes from within and is subjective. We also argue about its objectivity, and many will attest that their moral code is a paragon above all others. Morality is a code by which most sane humans live their lives; it would seem logical that such a dominant force in human interaction would foster such discourse. Amongst all the uncertainty in the nature of morality, however, there is but one certainty: morality is based entirely on perspective.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Teri Lawrence Ch 201 Essay 2 November 25, 2014 Although the world consists of a variety of cultures, all of which have their own relative laws and customs, there exists a universally understood moral code of behavior between humans. Through this code we learn right from wrong, we learn not to harm others, and we learn that respect is key when it comes to dealing with human relationships. Essentially this code of behavior teaches us how to respond in social situations and it is expected that we follow it. People learn these rules from experience, from their friends and family, from the media, and through a variety of other sources.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics are system of moral principles by which Christian Adherents can practically apply the traditional teachings, which are ultimately unpinned by the beliefs of christianity. Thus, the process of ethical reasoning can be used to affirm the love of god and make active moral decisions within the Christian community. The fundamental sources of Christian ethical teachings reside within Jesus’s commandments of love, Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes. Each of these doctrines create a fundamental framework for the principals of ethics, and further provide an adherent with guidance to follow core beliefs and reflect in every action they take. Bioethics effectively prescribe specific guidance and moral practice in relation to the contemporary issues…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the pledge of allegiance was originally proposed, it read, “I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all" (Bellamy). Since then, of the United States of America and Under God have been added. The phrase “Under God”, proposed in 1954, was originally meant to differentiate the United States from communist, atheist Soviet Union (USHistory.org). One of the main proponents for adding it to the pledge was the Knights of Columbus, a catholic fraternal group. Since then, there has been arguments both for and against including the phase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the question of free will, I would have to say I am a hard determinist. I once thought that we had a choice, but these choices were decided by our world. I had some understanding of this idea without searching out an answer to describe it as hard determinism. The universe has it's own natural processes that we understand through chemistry, physics, math, and other fields of study. These processes have a cause and effect relationship, so they influence our environment, which leads to determined factors.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People in life who believe in God often base their lives around his existence. Their morals might be based on what God, or their religious text says, rather than their own logical and rational brain. As religion and God have gained popularity over the centuries, this idea of morals lying in God’s…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis Paper # 3 Analysis of “Religion Gives Meaning to Life,” by Louis P. Pojman Introduction: In this article, “Religion Gives Meaning to Life,” Louis P. Pojman believes that religion, but mainly a theistic religion gives purpose and meaning to life. Pojman feels that, since people cannot prove that theism is true or not true, then therefore, people should live like theism is true. A world with theism, living life following a higher being would be a better world than living a life of self-governing, autonomy. Lastly, Pojman believes that living in autonomy is not really affected by having a religion or faith but instead religion may help everyone’s autonomy because they will have more purpose for their personal goals.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Deontology

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy: in ancient times it was the driving force of people’s beliefs on how they should go about their everyday lives. Today, it is the backbone of many Theist’s and even Atheist’s beliefs, or lack thereof. For example, Christianity’s Ten Commandments “thou shalt not steal, [and] thou shalt not kill” (Bible, Exodus 20:1-17) has many things in common with Deontology, which is the stance that something is either right or wrong and the right thing should be done no matter the circumstance. On the other hand, Atheists tend to align more with the Consequentialist point of view, which is the stance that whatever benefits the masses is what should be done. Another type of ethics is Religious Ethics, or determining right and wrong from a religious aspect.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, morality is often influenced by religion by making people think they will be punished after they die for doing certain…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well, think of how the world would be if everyone did whatever they wanted and didn’t think of right or wrong while carrying out their actions. It is very ideal to have specific morals of what’s right and wrong, Without morals, where would life take us? Would there even be a meaning to life if everyone just did what they pleased without any significance behind it? If you don’t consider your values and beliefs, life could be a mess. Morals are in existence to guide your life to goals rather than be controlled by unhealthy habits and actions.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays