Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Is the Fourth Amendment violated by police action of remotely accessing a GPS or a vehicle’s tracking capabilities without a warrant or the probable cause necessary for the acquiring thereof, therefore necessitating Senator Snowy’s support of Taylor Thomas’s bill; and what would be the implications on the future of Fourth Amendment law if Senator Snowy declined to support the bill and thusly permitted the dubious practices to persist indefinitely?
SHORT ANSWER
Notwithstanding the current sentiments and Fourth Amendment law which allow the police to remotely accesses the GPS tracking capabilities of vehicles of presumably innocent citizens, Senator Thomas’s bill should be supported by Senator Snowy because the current tactics utilized by the
…show more content…
Senator Robinson believes that Senator Thomas’s bill will prevent the police from successfully tracking suspected criminals. While this may be true, that would be a desired outcome. Our legal system is contingent upon the presumption that citizens are considered innocent until proven guilty, therefore, if the police have no articulable basis for the probable cause necessary to obtain a warrant to track a person of interest in a criminal investigation, they should not be permitted to track them. While the police must be allowed to serve their role in our society and ensure the safety of the public, the liberty and privacy interests at stake are too vital to be outweighed by the debatable security

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment right were violated is because the thermal imager that the U.S. Government used broke the five senses rule. In Document D it states,”When technology can exceed the natural senses, it subverts the human ability to contain private matters in a normal way.” DLK tells us in his opinion, that if…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed in 1976, the Hyde Amendment took effective in 1780,when the supreme court ruled it to be constitutional. The Hyde Amendment stated that women would not have the benefits to be cover by federal funding in case they wanted to go through the procedure of abortion. Named after the congressman Henry Hyde the amendments must be passed each year. President Bill Clinton was the one who went against it throughout his campaign in 1992 came to petition a modified version of the Amendment. Actually, the recent version allows medicaid to be used only in cases of rape or incest and also if the health of the woman is at risk, but all others options are banned.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. U.S. Const. amend. I. Exemptions may be altered or repealed except those exempting real or personal property used exclusively for religious, educational or charitable purposes as defined by law and owned by any corporation or association organized exclusively for one or more of such purposes and not operating for profit. N.Y. Const.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God incorporated everyone with unalienable rights, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness or property, when the created us. Also aware that there is a presence of sin; He knew there was a need for limited government. Our ancestors believed in this need for limited government as well, so they designed rules to assist in the control and prevention of crime. They wrote our Bill of Rights and our Constitution, which help protect the people from unlawful acts. The fourth amendment; the right to lawful search and seizure, as well as other rights such as the plain view doctrine; have been set in place by officials for everyone’s protection.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2005 Antoine Jones was arrested for drug possession. The police had been able to follow Mr. Jones by attaching a tracking device to the bottom of his car, which they did receive a warrant to do, but only for 10 days and only in DC. The police installed the tracker on the 11th day when the warrant had expired. This device was always on and tracked him for a month. He was convicted, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit stated in the 1983 case were a beeper was used to follow a car, but the car had to be followed in the officers view of site and this tracker was always on.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures, but as the court case Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347 (1967) “states that whatever a person knowingly exposes to the public even within one’s own house is not protected by the Fourth Amendment”. According to the Fourth amendment if a package is closed against inspection no matter where it is police must obtain a warrant to search it as if it were in your home. Unlike Mr. Greenwood who knowingly exposed his opaque trash bags on the curb for the trash collector to pick it up as to anyone or anything on the public street. Also the Fourth Amendment was not violated since the trash collector was going to be there to pick up the garbage in the neighborhood as usual and…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, most searches violate of the Fourth Amendment unless it conducted after a warrant has been used based on probable cause. Undercover and “Institution” Agents are pivotal factors in conducting searches that do not infringe on the rights stated in the Amendment. Undercover agents who take action based on the consent of the defendant imply that no intrusion took place and the Amendment was upheld. INSERT COURT CASE Along with Searches, Seizures also have guidelines and stipulations that are designed to abide by the Fourth Amendment.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example why many people do not accept surveillance is because it has also affect the people by causing discrimination against one another. Greenwald also states “Some of the surveillance was ostensibly devoted to terrorism suspects. But great quantities of the program manifestation have nothing to do with national security.” (94) In this quote Greenwald says that many of the programs have nothing to do with national security because they don’t just see the information or everything there surveillance is capturing the government is saving everything not for a day nor a week but for years and this is information that they don’t need to have.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the government be allowed to use electronic surveillance ? I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. They shouldn't be allowed to use electronic surveillance because they are invading our privacy. They can’t do that without court orders or warrants, so they can’t do it to just regular normal people. This can lead to misunderstandings.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Digital technology has been rapidly developing through the late 20th century and as a result has now become accessible globally, allowing for new methods of socialisation and commerce. Telecommunication is a product of these advancements and with it come the legal issues which arise from how it can be a medium for criminals to utilise as a medium for their illegal agendas, varying from activities such as hacking and terrorism. It is often difficult for domestic law enforcement and national security agencies to persecute criminals as there are multiple forms of disguising identity either through disposable technology or masking VPNs (Virtual Private Networks). The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) was created for the…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “If the police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown had been wearing a camera, the nation might already know who’s telling the truth about what happened that tragic day in Ferguson” ( “When Cops Wear Cameras” A.6 ). These are cases where technology should be regulated because it ensures people 's safety, and their justice. Research shows that technology is not being regulated. Since it hasn’t been regulated, people have lost their lives during tragic events. Therefore technology should be regulated to ensure our nation 's safety and privacy.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays