Information Failure On Food Labels

Superior Essays
The problem analysis of information failure on “natural” label food products examines whether government intervention is needed or if the market is able to resolve the problem on its own. The market failure for this regulatory rule has been a significant information failure of labeling food products “natural” by the food manufacturers. The food industry market fails to provide all the information required by consumers to make healthy rational consumption decisions. Mislabeling the term “natural” on food products is affecting consumers of all types. Even the most educated consumers on nutrition knowledge have a hard time understanding the true definition of the term “natural” on food products. The inadequate actions of the FDA in not defining …show more content…
Not only does misinformation affect their decision on food products but it also impacts their health and nutrition as well. With an in-depth look at the qualitative and quantitative analysis along with market feasibility will create a pivotal decision for the government to decide to either intervene or leave it to the market itself.

Qualitative Analysis of Misinformation on Food Labels

The majority consumers of food products are negatively affected by the misinformation of “natural” on food labels that has inhibited many consumers to make healthy rational consumption decision. The population group that is most vulnerable to this problem is very young children and individuals that are 60 years and older. These two groups don’t have enough knowledge and the background education to make pivotal decisions on making the right food choices
…show more content…
There needs to be a government intervention to solve the information failure by food manufacturers to consumers. If left alone for consumers and food companies to solve on its own, there would be no solution since there are significantly increasing health problems due to misinterpreted nutrition label for “natural” foods. The government intervention will allow a change to be made from the current issue. The two parties between consumers and food companies need a solution for consumers to be confident in their choice of purchasing food products. As previously stated, the majority of consumers have limited knowledge of what “natural” really means. Currently, the lack of government standards on food labeling issue has allowed food companies to label “natural” in a misleading way. The food manufacturers are using the lenient rule proposed by the FDA for food labeling on “natural” products to benefit themselves and not evaluating the consequences of the consumers. This has resulted in negative externality that is harming consumer health and well-being while the food companies are benefiting without cost. After all, the labels on food products concerning to the FDA jurisdiction do not have to be reviewed before marketing which is a major source of the problem. Therefore, the food companies are able to conceal the negative information that will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Unhealthy Food Myth

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Customers enjoy on the go, easy to eat, mess free food products but are not aware of the fact that there are not quite informed about how their food is chemically induced. It all boils down to poor nutrition seeing a box that saying “Whole grain” does not necessarily mean it is. Since the government has no control on the front of the box that where they fool us customers who are in a hurry. They mislead us because they are quite aware of the fact that no one will read the fine print if the box says Fat free or any other healthy claims. “In the long run we cannot rely on the food industry to reformulate, repackage, or relabel its way out of the problem it has created” is what I agree with the author statement.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Food policy legislators act as if there will never come a time for reform. The time for reform has come because of so many issues with the food policy, leaving it almost crippled. The sources that power agriculture will run out in due time, and if no reforms are made, the transportation side of the food policy will fall in on itself because of a lack of fuel.Also, the food policy has created its own “disease”, food allergies, and reforms need to be put in place to protect Americans from developing this “disease”. The public has right to know what they are purchasing to eat regardless of how much money a company will make by strategic labeling. Just as the Constitution is meant to evolve with time, so must the food policy.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Modification is not the solution. Though it is a way to create more food, the food being made is not necessarily good food: It is bad for both the consumers and the environment. Shoppers buying food have the right to know what it is that they are eating, yet due to the lack of labeling: they do not know. Pests can evolve quicker and become stronger faster because of GMOs. Lastly, genetically modified foods are not good for people, animals, or the…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gmo Labeling Pros And Cons

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In reality, it only gives food producers and retailers a choice. In short term, producers will try to avoid using GM ingredient as much as possible due to most consumers holding a false belief that GM food is either unhealthy or environmentally unfriendly. Thus food in the market will be labeled as non GM, and consumers do not really have a choice. In the long term however, when people are better educated with GMO, producers may find it profitable to use GM ingredient and sell product both GM and non GM. In this scenario, consumers will have a better choice (Carter and Gruère, 2003).…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Monsanto Pros And Cons

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to Monsanto, there is not a needed requirement to label genetically modified foods appearing on supermarket shelves. Many consumers just want to be aware of what foods are being genetically modified, but Monsanto automatically disagrees on the bill (Barrett). This would generally make the public feel skeptical over Monsanto’s true motive in the biotech industry. Why would Monsanto and other companies want to hide whether or not some crop has been genetically modified? The reason could be that genetically modified crops and its “dose” of Round-Up Ready do result with many negative effects as well as possibly being the start to all food security problems due to its recent discovery and insubstantial safety verifications.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Food Industry Unhealthy

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Not only is the food industry deceiving Americans, it is putting the population’s health at risk for the sole purpose of making themselves look not as bad as they might be to sell their products. This is clearly unfair for the people who are actively searching for healthier foods. With some food items boasting the fact they are “fat-free” or “low sugar”, if the actual nutrition can have a 20 percent margin of error, then the whole selling point of the product can be nulled, but only if the population is aware of the leeway food companies are given. However, because companies resort to shady tactics, it is clear companies are not concerned for the population’s well-being. As long as companies continue to use misleading labels on their food products, average consumers could be making…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tax To Junk Food Essay

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nutrition in food is another vast issue that needs to be thought about because it has to do with illnesses and diseases. People who do not have a well-balanced diet, with the nutrients that are needed in their day to day lives, pose a threat to being obese and developing obesity-related illnesses and diseases. Jacobson & Brownell (2000) write that “legislative bodies find it more practical to tax well-recognized categories of food that play little useful role in nutrition. Soft drinks and snack foods typically add unneeded calories to the diet or replace nutritious foods, such as low-fat milk or fruit, without providing significant levels of nutrients” (Jacobson & Brownell, 2000). Therefore, to be able to prevent these diseases from happening, a tax needs to be added to junk foods, to show that those foods should not be bought as much as they currently are because they have no nutritional value in our diets.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Preservative although bad for one's health are readily available and accessible. Regardless of taxation people will steal eat junk food “Junk food’ taxes are also not guaranteed to reduce overall caloric intake, as some hope. Importantly, fast food consumption (a common target for a "fat tax") may be relatively unresponsive to price changes because individuals may simply switch to other non-taxed, but still energy-dense (lots of calories per serving size) foods”(Esmail)Considering that most desserts are unhealthy it would most likely be taxed. People should not be taxed to attempt to curb the obesity epidemic because healthy people occasionally eat junk food. It is all about moderation not taxation.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is just as important to know as food deserts, in my opinion. Food insecurities are an important thing to know because so many people, families in fact, in the United States do go without significant quantities of food because they are too poor to provide. Learning about these problems makes me think that more people should donate to food pantries and do more food drives to help the less fortunate because no one deserves to go hungry. Food deserts and food insecurities can go together in many ways because not only can people not afford to buy enough food for their families, but people in food deserts, do not even have a place to buy it. This is a huge problem that needs to be fixed in…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many consumers also believe that the government cannot infringe their personal right to consume any kind of food they want. This has lead to poor nutrition choices and has caused the obesity epidemic to arise in the first place. According to the authors, marketing is also partly to blame for this epidemic due to their failure to expose the many of the health risks in the food they are selling. With these different proposals and effects in mind, a junk food tax isn’t the most effective solution to combat obesity in America. While the tax might have some effect on the health epidemic, the authors clearly show there needs to be a greater sense of urgency in order to fully resolve the health crisis that is…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics