Flaws In Today's Society

Superior Essays
When the founding fathers of America risked their lives to build the United States they knew that having free speech is key to a democracy that reigns in a world full of controversy. As much as we would like to think we have progressed there are still cringe worthy events that happen every single day. Dealing with controversy that arises has two solutions. Discussion and debate or running away and ignoring the issue. While debates can lead to offensive remarks that are as hideous as the topic of discussion at least the issue is brought to the general public’s focus where it can be worked out through a diverse society that has a broad range of different experiences and situations. Unfortunately, today’s society rather not talk about controversial …show more content…
As much as society would like to think that we have progress in our tolerance there is still work to be done. There are still social injustices that happen every day that prevent people in their pursuit of happiness. Simply put it, there is no excuse for these social injustices and there never was. If our society is ever to become completely tolerant of all than the world will truly be a better place. However, with that being said, honesty is also an admiral quality to have as well. The biggest flaw in today’s political correctness is not exposing the injustices of today. Not speaking and debating our own flaws as a society is blinding and a prime example of propaganda. These overly politically correct people are turning a desirable movement into a disaster that is bordering on a fascist ideology and …show more content…
The best example of this hypocrisy was when Omar Mahmood, a student for the University of Michigan, wrote a satirical piece for his school paper, The Michigan Review, about the overly politically correct movement. By speaking out his opinion, overly politically correct students complained enough to get him laid off from his school newspaper, The Michigan Daily, and as a result, Mahmood became unemployed. Not only did these people get this young man fired but they then proceed to “vandalize Mahmood’s doorway” and left notes by his door saying “Everyone hates you, you violent prick.” (Lukianoff & Haidt). Which is the height of this movement’s hypocrisy. Omar Mahmood has done nothing except voice his opinion on a newspaper column yet he was meet by a student body that called him a “violent prick” while at the same time having that same student body commit the violent crime of vandalism against him. Actions like this really show a movements true colors and these type of actions show that this movement is led by a group of uneducated, narcissistic, hypocrites. These people care only about themselves. They couldn’t care less if they take away someone’s freedom of speech or their pursuit of happiness because they disagreed with something someone said and because of that, that person must be punished which is the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Middlebury Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There had been a survey which was placed that showed the college students are limiting their freedom of speech. In the results of the survey “Approximately 19 percent of the 1,500 students said that violence is an acceptable course of action to prevent a person with “offensive” views from speaking”. This result proved why the students rather use violence which led to them assaulting Charles Murray rather than performing a peaceful protest. The article mainly sums up that colleges are prohibited from addressing certain topics. Rather than facing the facts/ reality, colleges sugar coats topics without making the students feel they are being discriminated against.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main aim of the article is to expose how political correctness is harmful to our education system. The article argues that while some trigger warnings should be necessary, such as things that may trigger major emotional response, minor issues of political correctness should not be considered trigger warnings. These issues include microaggressions (small phrases or actions that have no malicious meaning but still get mistaken for insults) such as “Where were you born?” These minor trigger warnings are harmful to students in the long run because it restricts the scope of learning and poorly prepares students for the real world. The authors…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Victor Tan Chen article, on “Are Campus Activist Too Dogmatic”, many points were made, however was not followed by a valid argument. In his article, he discussed how college activist is a nuisance to society in a way that targets liberals. Chen never seems to emphasize in his article the reasons for the campus activists protest, yet includes the fact that their protest is highly severe. In other words, Chen’s article is almost dismissive to the whole point of the student protesters furthermore, describing their actions as being useless in its entirety even with them tackling issues like racism and sexism. It is a total disregard of your first amendment right, abridging the right to freedom of speech in this country in a logical…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment protects the right to freely express an opinion. But, this law only goes so far, as in, it doesn’t shield us from the profane perspective of other people. Gilberto Valle, an ex-police officer, expressed his desire to abduct, torture, and eat the flesh of women through social media. The crimes were never actually committed, however, concern among the people around him arose. No matter the vulgarity, everyone like Valle is “justified” to speak their mind, as long as it doesn’t harm the government.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hell You Say Sanneh

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Hell You Say: Critical Analysis In this article originally published in the New Yorker, Kelefa Sanneh is giving us a very objective view of free speech and the two sides to it. He points out that on one side the liberals are arguing that there should be some kind of limit put on it so that people don’t get offended. On the other hand conservatives are arguing that free speech is one of our most fundamental rights and there should be no restrictions placed on it. He illustrates the arguments made by the two sides but fails to make an argument of his own and write a coherent essay.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Gravey, an early 20th century American Political leader, once stated “A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots. “ For any group of people to be successful, it is imperative that they understand where they once came from. Many precentors in our class captured the essence and importance created by the specific culture they studied. There are numerous amounts of cultures that all interact and intermingle in many different ways that make up the country we live in today.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kent State Massacre

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages

    " ISsues: Understanding Controversy and Society. Accessed January/February, 2017. https://issues.abc-clio.com/Search/Display/914880?sid=914880&webSiteCode=SLN_ISS&returnToPage=%2fSearch%2fDisplay%2f914880%3fsid%3d914880&cid=0&view=print&lang=&token=1B5E7433F33D3A37A817C374F16D9B8C&casError=False.…

    • 1829 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years now, people have tried to be more “politically correct” in everything they say or do. “Political correctness,” I have observed does not only pose problems for those in the majority but for the minorities as well. While on the surface this seems to be just a way of being considerate and kind to fellow human beings, I believe it is actually hurting society as a whole. When majority members cannot speak candidly, members of under-represented groups also suffer. What it results in is that no one, even the minorities it tries to protect, can discuss their concerns about fairness and fears without falling into the negative stereotypes.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is both right and privilege that we can neither take it for granted nor back away. It’s important to find a middle ground where we can hear one another, where we can debate and disagree with respect. People in America have learn that is good to have an opinion and that you opinion…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there is one thing I have learned from my time as an undergraduate so far, it is that free speech is no longer about sharing ideas or holding conversations, but rather shouting down one’s opposing side. Disagreement is a natural human behavior, but when expressions become heated and motivated by one’s personal beliefs, they also become unproductive. Universities should be places where ideas are discovered and discussed, not where haphazard claims and quick anger should dominate campus dialogues. It is a lesson all young political leaders should take to hear before their political opinions get the best of…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a privilege all Americans share. A person can state whatever they please, so long as it doesn’t cause a clear and present danger, without government interference. The idea that someone can legally think, be, and say whatever they want is what lead millions of immigrants to form the U.S. back in 1776 and is the same reason people fight for their right to live here today. Thanks to information being so accessible in this digital age, individuals are told that they are allowed and to study and form an educated opinion. This comes with one catch.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Remember the day when you could say anything you wanted without worrying about someone telling you, “That is politically incorrect”or “do not say that, that could offend someone.” People long to be able to speak their mind in public without anyone thinking that they are weird or crazy. This theory applies in movie theaters, grocery stores, shopping malls and even schools. Lately it seems as though you have to retain your thoughts inside your mind and not say anything out loud. People have to censor what they say so that no one will be offended, but how can you please everyone?…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary of “In Defense of Prejudice” In the United States, it can be seen almost anywhere that societies are becoming more and more conscious of the words they use to describe people, in the case of accidentally offending someone. However, when some words are determined as being “hate-speech” and are deemed criminal, the notion of free speech begins to be altered. With certain words now being treated as legitimate violence against another, where does one draw the line when considering one’s constitutional right to free speech, even when that person is obviously prejudiced? In Jonathan Rauch’s essay, “In Defense of Prejudice”, he argues that instead of eradicating all forms of prejudice in the United States,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s world, there are many topics of intense discussion and debate. These topics range from the current unstable environment throughout the Middle East, the effects of climate change and how to control it, and to this country’s very own national debt. It does not seem to matter what news program you turn on, but there is a current hot topic being discussed. There is one topic that has been striking up heated debates and banter, perhaps longer than any of these. While not often at the top of the list, it has been there in the background burning the longest.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays