Finding Truth In Apology By Socrates

Improved Essays
In a day to day sense, most people jump to conclusions about whether or not something is true, before they even have a chance to examine the idea and make a decision about it themselves. That means that the ideas they are agreeing with may not be true because they did not actually think about the different sides of the idea. And, what one person sees as justifiably true, another person may see the same idea as a false opinion. But what causes each person to decide that the idea being presented is something they know? These ideas are separated by the process of determining whether the idea is justifiably true.
One way that something can become justified is by possessing evidence that “consists of perceptual, introspective, memorial, and intuitional
…show more content…
In “The Apology,” Socrates tries to disprove the claim that has been made that he is the wisest and “might go to the god with a refutation in … hand.” (***) His theory of finding truth is through questioning an idea to see if any part of it is untrue. If he is able to find something that disproves a truth that has been presented, then it must no longer be true due to the fact that it has mistakes. This speech also shows us that the previously mentioned ideas of justifying belief may not always work. When Socrates provides his counter examples to what the oracle has said, and proves that it must be true, the people of Athens still do not believe him. Going off of the idea that belief is justified by evidence that we have experienced, these people should take the evidence that Socrates presents and use it to confirm his claims and ideas. However, they do not do this and therefore are not only going against his process of finding truth, but they also go against the method of comparing one’s past thoughts and experiences. This means that they must be using some other sort of system to determine what is true and false. Now this story may only be an anecdote, and Socrates did not actually question all of those people, but it still illustrates an important point. If an idea cannot be disproved, then what is to say that it is not true. This method does not include any emotion in the decision, which can also be important in deciding what is true. On the opposite side of the spectrum, however, that doesn’t mean that our beliefs should be based solely on our emotion, because then we could just believe what makes us happy, and not necessarily what is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Elbow, in his essay “The Believing Game”, explains that when people are arguing or simply just trying to get their opinion across, the use of logic is not present. The main idea of this essay is to discuss the ways that most people do not take the time to “see” another’s opinion, but rather assumes that it is the wrong opinion. Elbow goes into detail of the concept of the believing game, which is the act of believing in another’s view. Elbow stresses the idea of logic being used in arguments or the lack thereof logic in arguments.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ‘The Apology’ by Plato was about Socrates’ trial. Socrates at the age of seventy he had been convicted for breaking the law against ‘impiety’. This was for offending the Olympian gods (Zeus, Apollo and the rest of them) recognized in the city and occasions (17). Socrates was allowed to defend himself but haters would not listen to his ideas. Socrates believed in speaking the truth, which was his true character and was revealed.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The only things we know about Socrates are things that Plato wrote down for him, Socrates wasn’t much of a writer. This is why it is interesting to read Plato’s dialogues because he or she gets to see Socrates from a different person’s perspective, an admirer really. This means that when he or she reads Apology they have to take into consideration that Plato…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immediately after Socrates begins his defense speech, he starts to create his manifesto of values with the first value being faith. From pages 26 to 27, sections 17c1-5 and 18a1-5, Socrates explains to the jurors that he has faith that they will overlook his style of speaking so that they may only focus on judging Socrates’ message. Socrates includes the value of faith in his manifesto because he sees the ability of placing trust within one another without having to fear unnecessary consequences of doing so as a fundamental part of forming meaningful and important relationships not only between citizens but also between citizen and state. Socrates then explains that obedience and respect, albeit to religion or to the laws of men, are other values that people should uphold. First, in section 19a6-7, Socrates states that he has to the follow the law, which is presumably the law established by men, while in section 29d2-4, Socrates explicitly states that he’d rather obey the gods than the jurors.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Apology, Socrates stands trail to defend himself from the accusations of “corrupting the youth” and disregarding the Gods of the state. In his speech he tells the jury that an oracle at Delphi told Chaerephon a friend of Socrates that Socrates is a man of wisdom and no man is wiser than he is. To prove this cannot be true Socrates conducts cross examinations to find someone who is wiser than he is. Through these examinations Socrates mission and main points are to help people by exposing their ignorance to find wisdom, to find virtue, to find truth and to improve the soul.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First, the primary accusation was brought by Meletus that Socrates did not believe in the God of Athens, which means as well that he is being accused of atheism. Meletus call that Socrates “did not believe in the gods of the city and doesn’t believe in other gods”. By Meletus claiming this of Socrates, at the same time he is accusing him for not believing in any God. Therefore, here we identify a contradiction within his accusation, as we see Socrates cannot at the same moment be an atheism and believe in other new divinities. The way Socrates defended himself to this accusation is by asking Meletus.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On a more allegorical level, Socrates acts as philosophy itself; philosophy is a study in which not everything can necessarily come to a conclusion and nothing can be assumed. Speaking as if there is a direct answer to philosophical questions or speaking extensively on a topic that one does not know much about is not only pretentious, but also shows a certain level of ignorance of whoever is speaking. If philosophy was on trial defending itself in the eyes of mankind, it would fight against the people who claimed to fully understand the unanswerable questions, and question them on how they know what they think they do; this is precisely what Socrates…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates begins his defense by remarking what persuasive speakers his accusers are in contrast to himself. He indicates that he does not expect to get a fair hearing because of the wide-spread rumors about him and that these rumors associate him with the natural philosophers. The problem with that association is that the natural philosophers were widely suspected of atheism because some of them openly advocated atheism. “Well, then, I will make my defence, and I will endeavor in the time which is allowed to do away with this evil opinion of me which you have held for such a long time; and I hope that I may succeed, if this be know that to accomplish this is not easy—I quite see the nature of the task. Let the event be as God wills: in obedience to the law I make my defence.”…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, I believe he can be innocent. Socrates may have different beliefs than the people in Athens, but he still believes in higher powers. He believes there is a god capable of power but the Athenians suppose otherwise. Socrates was being intentional when it came to being honest and trustworthy. He wanted to guard his ground and defend anything that does not speak of his name.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Apology of Socrates there is not real evidence of true impiety for the Athenian government, but Socrates does put forth feelings of arrogance and self-confidence within himself and his beliefs. Throughout Socrates’ trial he hardly questions anyone which would be seen in a traditional trial, he often goes on tangents and laments about the injustices of the world in large words that perhaps many of the people there did not understand which leads to him being seen as impious and rejecting traditional Athenian values. In the beginning of his trial Socrates talks about how he had never been to court in his more than seventy years of life, and that because he wasn’t accustomed to their language he would talk in the language he had learned,…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today is one of the most important days in my life, for I was chosen to be a member of the jury deciding Socrates’ fate. Meletus and other two people accuse Socrates is an evil-doer (Plato, Apology,p.234). They bring up 2 main accusations to Socrates First, Meletus accuses Socrates has corrupted the youth; Second, Meletus accuses Socrates does not believe in god, he is an atheist. Here is how Socrates defends himself.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contradiction of Socrates Plato illustrates Socrates in two different aspects in The Apology and in The Crito, which makes the reader ponder which interpretation of Socrates is substantial and which is fictions. Precisely, Plato portrayed Socrates with many inconsistencies in The Apology the emphasis was on obeying the Gods in contrast in The Crito the emphasis was on obeying the laws of Athens. In Plato’s Apology initiates with Socrates’ defense to the Athenian court demonstrating his innocence of the charges brought against him. Socrates was accused of breaking various laws under the Athenian court, the most significant laws were corrupting the youth and believing and worshiping in different Gods that the rest of the citizens in…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice to the Jury In the Apology, Plato characterizes Socrates to be wise and concerning for men’s souls. Throughout the defense Socrates claims that the jurors can kill him, but they cannot harm him. He believes that if they jurors convict him, they would be harming themselves because they are tainting their souls by ignoring the truth. Socrates’ arguments for these claims are cogent because Socrates centers his arguments on the fact that truth and justice is not truly defined and that man must constantly reflect upon his thoughts to clearly define these qualities.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays