An Analysis Of Plato's The Apology By Socrates

Good Essays
‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything, he …show more content…
In court, he says that his behavior to question everything is because of the Oracle of Delphi and he finally understood why it said that he was the wise man in the city if Athens. Socrates does not fear death, instead he believes that fearing death is the same as someone believing that they are wise whereas in reality they are not. Socrates says that he does not fear things which he doesn’t know has no knowledge about(pg.8) Socrates also believes that people will not do bad things if they had known better, “if I learn better, I shall cease to do what I am doing unwillingly (pg. 5)”. This quote is told by Socrates when Meletus accused him of corrupting the youth, saying that he did not know that it was bad for the youth to leave their families and follow him. If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society. He chose the punishment of being fed by the government …show more content…
Even if you own everything you want, without virtue one cannot experience true happiness that comes from within the heart. I agree with this value because to live a happy life virtue is necessary. Living a life without virtue can make you feel dead from inside. The joy that comes from helping a friend or even a stranger without expecting anything in return stays there for your entire life. The satisfaction of this joy is much more than acquiring something materialistic. The joy one feels due to materialistic things is temporary but when someone does the morally right things the joy that they feel is everlasting and no one can take that away from them. To live a happy life we should not assume that we have a lot of knowledge because, if someone like Socrates comes up and starts to question our knowledge this will make one insecure and sad. We must question knowledge given to us in order to seek true knowledge and as Socrates says one who has no knowledge of anything is the wisest of all.
In conclusion, some of Socrates values are very true and people follow it even to this day, but some of them I do not agree with. Some may agree with all Socrates has to say and some may not, but in my opinion one thing os for sure, just saying that one is wise doesn’t not make them wise and even having all the knowledge in the world does not a person wise if they cannot explain questions asked to them about this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, like all men, seeks the good. If he and others embrace something other than the good, it cannot be because they voluntarily and willfully turn their backs on it” (Zuckert 228). It is also unjust because one of the accusers, Anytus whose son wanted to follow Socrates, did not allow his son to do so and so his son became an alcoholic. He blamed Socrates and used this as another example of Socrates corrupting the youth. Socrates was not corrupting the youth, but his teachings taught to question everything because you cannot be sure of anything.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thrasymachus accuses Socrates of being the kind of person that learns from others instead of giving his own opinion and trying to teach others. Socrates agrees that he learns from others but does not agree that he does not try to teach others. Thrasymachus and Socrates finally agree that if Thrasymachus wins the challenge that Socrates will have to praise him because Socrates does not have money. Thrasymachus gives his definition…

    • 1313 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When people fear the unknown, they are unaware of the information that is present. When people take risks they have the potential to become a negative but also a positive situation, which results into fear because we never know the outcome of situations. In the reading, Apology by Plato, He created this reading because his speech defended what he believed in, which was that he is wiser than all men. This defensive system shows that he knows-that he knows nothing thus producing false wisdom as ignorance. Through Plato’s analysis he sees people who admire his thinking and sees those who are against it, thinking they brought him to trial.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    42a). This final statement is ironic because it is clear which of these is the better thing in Socrates case; as a result of living an examined life, and because the “unexamined life is not worth living for a human being,” Socrates has lived his life to the fullest extent by being a paradigm of virtue for the men of Athens in a society that does not want to hear the truth (Apo.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates makes the stunting--(stunning?) remark that “a good man cannot be harm in life or death,” and that killing him will do more harm. He understood that the first step to achieving wisdom is realizing one’s ignorance’s and if Socrates is he were gone, then no one will would show the people of Athens the path to truth. Socrates also understood that death is not to be fear feared, simply because…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It’s so intriguing because Socrates ends up being put to death on accusations of corrupting the youth and of atheism. He states that all he did was make people think, not corrupt the youth and nobody believes him. When the Republic is read, it is made very clear that Socrates is not in fact, corrupting the youth, but making them use their brains and think for themselves. Each person provides a definition and some provide a definition of a famous poet that they cannot back up. Socrates continues to push and push these people to think about their definition and defend it.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To be a true philosopher one must not only have their ideas but also offer their views on theories for thoughtful questions in ethics. This does not leave any room for letting others choose one’s own opinion. Although that did not stop the accusers of Socrates from believing his ideas were faulty and corrupted the youth. During Socrates’ trial, Socrates pointed out, “So it turns out all Athenians except for me make people the right sort of people, and I alone corrupt them,” (Plato 25a). That is, those who opposed Socrates’ viewpoint believed Socrates was the only one at fault.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates Trial Case Study

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates obviously knew this because he agreed to the social contract at adulthood. Socrates chose to stay in Athens and willingly obey to the Laws of Athens. It would also be contradictory for him to escape because he declined exile when it was presented to him at will, and then leave Athens when the Laws did not allow him to do so. Carl: But it was Meletus, and the public that accused Socrates so if the people are wronging Socrates unjustly, that means that they are wronging him in a way that is not in accordance with the Laws. Thus, Socrates should not be breaking the Laws in trying to break free from…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Crito” and the beginning parts of “Phaedo” portray Socrates as somebody who has entirely “given up” on life. A plan of escape is presented to Socrates in full confidence- to clarify, “confidence” in both connotations meaning the plan was more or less fool-proof too- and still, he refuses. His foundation, in this case, is for altruistic reasons. Escaping would be unjust, he tells Crito, and so would injure his soul. This justification is hard to believe for some readers considering that he argued against the existence of definite definitions of just and unjust and a professional in knowledge of all their features so profusely in “Euthyphro”.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Resistance as a civic virtue Laws are not standard. They changes from state to state and obviously from country to country. Athenians judicial system condemned to death a man for having different beliefs than theirs and based in Apology and Crito by Plato in this essay I claim that Socrates’ acceptance of death under a failing judicial system is unvirtuous although he tries to picture it as a virtuous and civic act. His aberration for obeying the outcome of his trial becomes pointless because if he wants to be virtuous he must go against the system showing resistance. Socrates has to continue fighting back the unfair system that condemns him and convince others to join his cause Should we follow the many or the one?…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays