Analyzing Peter Elbow's Essay 'The Believing Game'

Improved Essays
Peter Elbow, in his essay “The Believing Game”, explains that when people are arguing or simply just trying to get their opinion across, the use of logic is not present. The main idea of this essay is to discuss the ways that most people do not take the time to “see” another’s opinion, but rather assumes that it is the wrong opinion. Elbow goes into detail of the concept of the believing game, which is the act of believing in another’s view. Elbow stresses the idea of logic being used in arguments or the lack thereof logic in arguments. There is no possible way to prove an opinion wrong or right. Elbow states that one is never obligated to agree with someone else; however, believing in how the person has come to their own opinion is the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The act of actively combating our inductive bias in Kathryn Schulz’s Evidence in Kathryn Schulz’s essay, “Evidence”, the argument of the essay follows various situations brought up by Schulz, showing that people should take a positive approach to being wrong, and accept our error-prone nature, rather than obsessing with a perfect inadvertently-free ideal. Schulz ties together a lot of strong evidence, but fades back from a clear conclusion, steering the readers toward a relationship between error and the self. She further studies moral transformation on conversations, our attachment to a view wrongly identified due to our pre-conceived opinion off prior experience. Schulz stresses that in order for us to improve our relationship with to evidence,…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato, a classical Greece philosopher, is a pivotal figure in the field of philosophy and political thought. What does remain of his work today continues to be influential and relevant. Along with his teacher, Socrates, and his student, Aristotle, Plato laid the foundation for Western Philosophy as we know it. “The Allegory of the Cave”, from The Republic, is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon. The allegory serves as a prime example of an enduring thought experiment demonstrating a facet of human nature relevant to a number of fields in humanities today.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth Kolbert's article, “Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds,” in the New Yorkers February 2017 issue looks at some main ideas in three different psychological books about patterns in human reasoning and attempts to connect them to today’s politics. Her explanation of the studies and their outcomes were superb, though she could have done a better job at connecting these points to her political conclusion. It is difficult to distinguish what her main point is. She starts the article by describing a couple experiments done at Stanford on human reasoning.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will be discussing the popular deceiver argument, and Jonathan Vogel’s response to it. In his article, Vogel describes the deceiver argument and talks the reader through what it is and what it is trying to explain. After he does this, Vogel then goes on to reject the deceiver argument, claiming that premise two of the argument is false. The responses that have been put forth are then discussed by Vogel, most likely trying to come up with a response he deems worthy of being the best response to the deceiver argument. After Vogel finds his response of choice, he goes on to briefly explain it.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    5. Adam Frank's ‘Welcome to the Age of Denial’ is very effective in conveying its central message. The message in question is that science is important more so now than ever considering the fact that we have now ventured into an age where it is socially acceptable to refute facts. Frank effectively executes his argument through his voice and style through the whole of his article. Frank uses his voice/tone to better convey his argument by switching up the way he speaks to his audience.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elbow's Argument Analysis

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the traditional method of critical thinking, the goal is to find the right answer by discovering and ferreting out the wrong answers. Thus, in a multiple choice quiz, a student could determine that the correct answer was C by knowing that A, B, and D were incorrect. This student knows that, as Sherlock Holmes said, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” To me, this quote sums up the premise of what Elbow refers to as the doubting game. Once all untrue assertions have been eliminated, what remains is presumed true.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would run away one example is Harriet she ran away and hid in here grandmother home in a hole. She did this for seven years showing how horrible slavery was she was raped and beaten so a tiny hole was better. She final becomes free after she was able to move up north. Every one benefited from slavery from ship building to banking industry it was the center of economy. Cotton was something that was desired by all.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clifford and James are two philosophers who have contradicting opinions on whether having sufficient evidence is always necessary to believe in something. Where Clifford believes you cannot believe in anything without sufficient evidence, James believes that if the evidence doesn’t point in one way or another, it is justified to believe something based on our will. I will be arguing that James’ side is indeed correct. In James’ paper, he provides concrete evidence as to why his opinion is correct.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief,” Clifford argues the immorality of believing without sufficient evidence. In most situations, Clifford’s point of view would be practical; if we wish to be true seekers of the truth, it would be unethical to ever believe in something without sufficient evidence. This is a valid statement, but there are exceptions to this idea which are dependent on the situation. When it comes to the type of evidence presented, a belief can be justified or found to be wrong. Clifford sets two questions we are to ask ourselves when it comes to believing things that aren’t proven with physical evidence, rather shown by testimony.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “The Loser Edit”, Colson Whitehead explores the idea of a “loser edit”, which he defines as a narrative that strives to capture someone’s life to fit a certain edit. The edit puts a spotlight on our flaws through reality tv, social media, and real life situations. Whitehead explains that the loser and winner edit “clasp meaning onto experience”, through its control over our actions or reactions in everyday life. In this essay, Whitehead argues about the harm that the loser edit creates when it stretches beyond the barriers of reality tv into real life situations. An extreme representation of Whitehead’s worries can be seen in the Black Mirror episode “Nosedive”, through the importance the episode’s fictional society places on a…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Dying to Win, Robert Pape explains the causal logic of suicide terrorism and why the phenomenon has become more frequent since its inception in the 1980’s. This is accomplished through dividing the logic into three categories: strategic, social, and individual. Throughout this explanation Pape argues that suicide campaigns are not primarily derived from religious fundamentalism, but nationalism. This would indicate that such tactics are also a form of insurgency. To assess the overall argument, other scholar’s works on terrorist strategy will be used along with examples of conventional insurgencies.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Giannetti defines ideology as, “a body of ideas reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, group, class, or culture” (448). A film’s purpose is often reflected through the ideology it possesses and in this case, the ideology expresses the treatment of minorities in baseball culture. A League of their Own, The Perfect Game, and 42 all contain an explicit sense of ideology with a thematic orientation towards teaching people about treatment of minorities in baseball culture. A League of their Own is a film about the solution to keep baseball alive during WWII and that is to start a women’s baseball league. The Perfect Game is about a group of young boys from Monterrey, Mexico who aspire to be on a baseball team and when given…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Have a Little Faith by Mitch Albom is an excellent book about faith. The author has a great experience and a master’s degree in journalism, which gives him the skills to write books. Additionally, as a child, his schools and university were religious, which gives him the knowledge to write about faith. Tuesdays with Morrie, The Five People You Meet in Heaven, and The First Phone Call from Heaven are just three of the 42 books he has written. Furthermore, this book has great points about life lessons and faith, but these three are the most important to me: money could be used in different ways but it does not determine happiness, getting to know people, and giving second chances, and accepting all different religions.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays