The Argument Essay: Meletus's Defense Of Socrates

Improved Essays
Today is one of the most important days in my life, for I was chosen to be a member of the jury deciding Socrates’ fate. Meletus and other two people accuse Socrates is an evil-doer (Plato, Apology,p.234). They bring up 2 main accusations to Socrates First, Meletus accuses Socrates has corrupted the youth; Second, Meletus accuses Socrates does not believe in god, he is an atheist. Here is how Socrates defends himself. Socrates starts to give his defense about Meletus’ first accusation. The first accusation is that Socrates was corrupting youth (Plato, Apology, p.234). Socrates responds to this accusation by asking Meletus questions. First Socrates asks Meletus again that did he corrupt the youth. Meletus agrees with that statement. Then Socrates …show more content…
Meletus claimed that Socrates ' “did not believe in the god of the state, for Socrates believes in other new divinities of his own” (Plato, Apology, P238). Then Socrates asks Meletus a question “Meletus, you really think that I do not believe in any god (Plato, Apology, p.241)?” Meletus response was: “I swear by Zeus that you believe absolutely in none at all.” Here is a contradiction in Meletus’ accusation and Meletus’ response to Socrates’ question. Meletus cannot say that at the same time Socrates was an atheist and also believed in other divinities or gods. If Socrates doesn’t believe in any gods, then he cannot believe the god that is his own. Therefore I recognize that Meletus accusation has no meaning. Also, Socrates gives us a question: “Did ever any man believe in horsemanship, and not in horses? or in flute-playing, and not in flute-players (Plato, Apology, p.241)?” I think that means what he believes in not on any specific god but on the power of gods (Rubenfeld, CAL 105N, 10/07/15). Socrates also says that: “For this is the command of God, as I would have you know; and I believe that to this day no greater good has ever happened in the state than my service to the God (Plato, Apology, p.244).” Those words show me that he does believe in the spirit of god, he has the faith. Therefore, Meletus’ second accusation is not working. I think Socrates is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Socrates find this absurd and tells Meletus, “I do not believe you…and I do not think anyone else will” because how could one possibly believe that all Athenians except Socrates have the proper understanding of virtue. Socrates in stating this is asserting that if the jurymen believe in Meletus’ claim then they will be giving justice based on who they favor and not in accordance with the law. By doing this, they would be disobeying the laws of the state which Socrates says is impious in the Crito and therefore, would not be leading lives of virtue according to his perception of virtue. Following his…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate how Socrates replied to the main charge he was…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s Euthyphro A1. Socrates explains to Meletus that he is under indictment. Socrates is being charged with two accusations: “corrupting the young” and “not believing in the gods.” A2.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third premise is controversial in that it does not use Meletus’ definition of daimonic activities, but the definition that is colloquially synonymous with daimons. What is unclear is if Meletus knew the correct definition of daimonic activities at the start of the argument. Regardless, Socrates’ third premise uses a definition of daimonic activities that is not given by Meletus and should have asked him if he was allowed to insert this…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before proving his innocence, Socrates pointed that he was targeted for the charge of corrupting students’ mind because Gorgias was not charged for his teaching. To provide the defense against atheism, Socrates stated that it is not possible to believe in demigods and be an atheist (p.26). Because demigods have to be either gods or sons of gods, he could not believe in demigods without believing in gods, which proves Meletus was wrong. Socrates also used paralepsis, a rhetorical figure to help him persuade the jurors. He promised that he would not mention his children but he said “my friend, I am a man, and like other men, a creature of flesh and blood, and not of wood or stone, as Homer says; and I have a family, yes, and sons....”…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He continually refers to the wisdom that he possesses as “the god’s gift” (Grube 30d) and exhibits his trust in the power of the gods as he tells the jury, “...a good man cannot be harmed either in life or in death, and that his affairs are not neglected by the gods” (Grube 41c-d). It is hard to believe that the jury could find him guilty of atheism when he appears to have been blessed by the gods with this capacity for human wisdom. Socrates is nothing if not a virtuous man, as evidenced in his statement: “I would much rather die after this kind of defense than live after making the other kind” (Grube 38e). It is evident that it is against his morals to be dishonest, and he would rather tell the truth even if that entails dying, than deliver an elegant albeit dishonest speech that will ensure his acquittal. I have no doubts that Socrates had faith in the gods just as everyone else in Ancient Greece did, I merely speculate the degree to which his excellence extends.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Western philosophy began in the 6th century BCE in ancient Greece. These first philosophers that we know of are called “Pre-Socratics”, meaning they came before Socrates. Socrates’ philosophical prowess, however, brought forth a time that freedom of self-consciousness was first challenged. In my opinion, Socrates was the first philosopher to distinguish the value of philosophy even though they were just mere thoughts of men. In Bertrand Russell’s “The Value of Philosophy”, he addresses the very nature of philosophy itself.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, I believe he can be innocent. Socrates may have different beliefs than the people in Athens, but he still believes in higher powers. He believes there is a god capable of power but the Athenians suppose otherwise. Socrates was being intentional when it came to being honest and trustworthy. He wanted to guard his ground and defend anything that does not speak of his name.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contradiction of Socrates Plato illustrates Socrates in two different aspects in The Apology and in The Crito, which makes the reader ponder which interpretation of Socrates is substantial and which is fictions. Precisely, Plato portrayed Socrates with many inconsistencies in The Apology the emphasis was on obeying the Gods in contrast in The Crito the emphasis was on obeying the laws of Athens. In Plato’s Apology initiates with Socrates’ defense to the Athenian court demonstrating his innocence of the charges brought against him. Socrates was accused of breaking various laws under the Athenian court, the most significant laws were corrupting the youth and believing and worshiping in different Gods that the rest of the citizens in…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Is Guilty Essay

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates’ defense against the charge is that he does not believe in God’s is fairly adequate. Yes, Socrates does admit to not believing in the God’s of Athens, but does proclaim that he lives his life by the words of some sort of higher being, or spirits. As he mentions, “I live in great poverty because of my service to Gods” (Plato). I agree with his argument when he says that claiming he is an atheist is completely false, considering he does believe in higher power spiritual beings. Believing in a higher power proves he is not an atheist.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Every human being has the ability to decide what they believe and what they do not. At a very early age, we develop judgement that allows us to choose whether or not to accept certain claims. These assertions may be tempting, but our reasoning allows us to critically analyze the information with respect to all of our previous knowledge. These claims may be faith based, fact-based, or opinion. Without recognizing it, we take every bit of information we gather, analyze it, and decide whether we accept its validity.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believes that for the accusation that meletus has made you don’t take a matter for trial but you advice that person that what he is doing is wrong you don’t just go to courts because when the matter has reached court that means you want punishment. This matter is not subjected to punishment it can be resolved peacefully without anyone facing facing punishment or jail. If Socrates was corrupting the youth, the youth and their parents should have noticed and reported the matter. If this case was reported by the parents of thr youth that was taught by Socrates it would be strong bt then because it was reported by meletus it is weak.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed Meletus has proven that he is guilty of everything he accused Socrates of. First, Meletus himself corrupts the mind of the youth by contradicting his charges against Socrates. Second,…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he wanted to live he would have just said what the jury wanted to hear. The jury wanted to see Socrates embarrass himself and beg for forgiveness, but Socrates was too proud to do that. To make things worse then Socrates calls himself a gift from the gods when Plato writes, “That I am the kind of person to be a gift of the god to the city” (Pg.8[31b]). This only show how arrogant he was. When you start calling yourself a gift from god it shows you are not humble and that you love yourself too much.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays