Federalist No. 10 Analysis

Improved Essays
Although celebrated as a pioneering democracy, the United States devised a system of government that deviates from purely democratic principles through the
Constitution. That is, when assessing the intentions of the framers, the Constitution’s premeditated deviation from an absolute popular rule establishes a system of governance that prioritizes the security of American liberties. Moreover, by examining the nuances of the Constitution through the framers’ lenses, the departure from purely democratic ideals becomes all the more apparent. Nonetheless, the evolution of the Constitution not only highlights the nation’s willingness to veer away from a purely democratic stance, but also challenges the viability of antiquated democratic principles. As a result, despite paving the road for modern democracies, the American system of governance outlined by the Constitution dissatisfies emerging democracies around the world prompting new ways to pursue representation.
Contextualizing America’s Framework for Governance With Athenian democracy laying the foundation for future democracies, the question arises as to what closely emulates a true democracy.* Modern interpretations of democratic theory have developed into
…show more content…
10 reveals the dangers of an overly democratic government conducive of factions that result in the tyranny of the majority. Madison argues that as long as the people are given the ability to think freely, to express their grievances, to gain various degrees of wealth, people will find ways to congregate and to pursue their agenda at the cost of infringing on the rights of others. It is of human nature to assemble with like-minded individuals, and therefore inevitable for factions to develop. Therefore, Madison argues that, in the best interest of the country, a republic would limit the powers of the Majority. A republic would help protect individual liberties from majority rule as it limits the scope of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the fifty-five delegates come together to make brilliant laws to prevent tyranny in their country. In documents A,C, and D, it lists the laws that made the United States more of a democracy rather than a republic. The delegates established federalism to prevent tyranny in the Unites States by.... “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The uniqueness of the United States democracy can be observed in the three focal points laid out by the authors, separation of power, primary…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 responds to the Antifederalists argument that a “large republic” cannot long survive. Madison set out the task of devising a republic in which a majority of citizens will be unable to tyrannize the minority. Madison says the rotten apple is factions. Factions are defined as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the constitution of the United Stats of America was written in 1787 it has long since been a topic of conversation as well as confrontation among politicians and political theorists alike. The ideals of James Madison and John Dewey regarding constitutional reform and democracy are just another example of this. These two men, both extremely influential in their own way, have conflicting views of liberty, democracy and largely the revision of the constitution and its consequences or lack there of. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution, believed that constitutional revision should be infrequent. While John Dewey argues for change, while not specifically on constitutional revision but rather for “effective liberty” for the state of democracy as a whole, which ultimately relates to that of constitutional revision.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What would have happened if four presidents that have long since been entered into the history books had not been the ones elected? In 1876, 1888, 1960, and 2000, the popular vote and the Electoral College did not elect the same candidate. However, the Electoral College had the final decision.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Experiment In Democracy

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The “Great Experiment in Democracy” is what the United States of America is often referred to as. From its beginning the United States has been a nation governed by and for the people, becoming the first nation to have the people tell the government what it can do, not vise-versa. What is considered to be among the greatest of feats is what former President Ronald Reagan believed was so special about the orderly transfer of constitutional authority being nothing less than a miracle in the eyes of the world. This is what defines the United States as an experiment. But the transfer of power was not always as smooth as Americans know it today.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Aristotle’s definitions of Oligarchy and Democracy, can America be considered a true democracy? Aristotle points out several forms of government throughout his “Democracy and Oligarchy”. In this work, Aristotle focuses primarily on democracy and oligarchy and makes a strong effort through the use of definitions to distinguish between the many instances these two forms of government are able to exist in and the differences between the them. Using Aristotle’s definitions, let us diagnose America and see if she can rightfully claim democracy, first by explaining what the two types of government consist of and then by picking through a few characteristics of America. “Democracy is the form of government in which the free are rulers”…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays