Federalist No. 10 Analysis

Improved Essays
Although celebrated as a pioneering democracy, the United States devised a system of government that deviates from purely democratic principles through the
Constitution. That is, when assessing the intentions of the framers, the Constitution’s premeditated deviation from an absolute popular rule establishes a system of governance that prioritizes the security of American liberties. Moreover, by examining the nuances of the Constitution through the framers’ lenses, the departure from purely democratic ideals becomes all the more apparent. Nonetheless, the evolution of the Constitution not only highlights the nation’s willingness to veer away from a purely democratic stance, but also challenges the viability of antiquated democratic principles. As a result, despite paving the road for modern democracies, the American system of governance outlined by the Constitution dissatisfies emerging democracies around the world prompting new ways to pursue representation.
Contextualizing America’s Framework for Governance With Athenian democracy laying the foundation for future democracies, the question arises as to what closely emulates a true democracy.* Modern interpretations of democratic theory have developed into
…show more content…
10 reveals the dangers of an overly democratic government conducive of factions that result in the tyranny of the majority. Madison argues that as long as the people are given the ability to think freely, to express their grievances, to gain various degrees of wealth, people will find ways to congregate and to pursue their agenda at the cost of infringing on the rights of others. It is of human nature to assemble with like-minded individuals, and therefore inevitable for factions to develop. Therefore, Madison argues that, in the best interest of the country, a republic would limit the powers of the Majority. A republic would help protect individual liberties from majority rule as it limits the scope of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    interests and also couldn't have occurred if they did not join together to fight for those particular interests that were trying to be taken away from them. In 1787, James Madison, a federalist, writes a set of papers in which he discusses the causes and effects of a faction. In The Federalist No. 10, James Madison claims that one way of “curing the causes of faction” is by “giving to every citizen the same opinion, the same passions, and the same interests.” Similarly, in Benjamin Franklin’s…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist 10 Analysis

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist 10 is a series of essays created by James Madison that featured other writers such as Alexander Hamilton and John Jay under the pen name “Publius.” James Madison was a supporter of the United States Constitution and wrote the Federalist in favor of the Constitution. During the time he also became the United States Representatives, and while in Congress drafted the Bill of Rights ("James Madison”). Once the Congress grew strong, James found himself disagreeing with another federalist’s…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays