Experience Of Presidents Essay

There have been very few studies done correlating presidents’ prior experience to their overall greatness or approval rating. The studies that have emerged more throughout the years focus primarily on experiences throughout their presidency. However, there have been some studies done analyzing whether presidents have more success depending on their previous background. Most scholars suggest no, there is not a direct link (Balz, 2010). There are, however, conflicting views on whether this is an accurate prediction. Many have suggested updating the Constitution to stipulate more clauses about the past career experiences of Presidents due to the level of difficulty it takes to be commander and chief of the free world (Balz, 2010). This claim is widely criticized, there are some scholars that believe anyone should be allowed the opportunity to become President no matter if they are considered under qualified (Simon, Uscinski, 2012). Also, this notion is criticized due there not being enough sufficient …show more content…
In a study conducted in 2010, the analysis states, “there is no evidence that political experience improves the likelihood of strong presidential performance” (Balz, 2010). Some scholars argue that the past experience levels of presidents are extremely important why others concede them to be irrelevant. One scholar, Paul Quirk concluded a study in 2010 that explained that they expertise of a President, “Can be acquired only through substantial and recent experience in Washington,” claims that the lack of this experience “need not pose much difficulty for a president. Like any technical skill, which in a sense it is, the necessary expertise can easily be hired” (CITE).
In 1990 Richard Neustadt conducted the same study gaining different results that were directly opposite of Paul Quirk. Richard