Exclusionary Rule Research Paper

Improved Essays
A number of confessions are often subject to close scrutiny. Around the 20th century the United States Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule. What the exclusionary rule does is prevent illegally obtained evidence “confessions” in a criminal trial. In order for a confession to be usable as evidence the law now states that the confession must be made freely and voluntarily. For a confession to be considered freely and voluntarily the individual must feel “complete mental freedom”. Courts also developed the per se rule, which excludes potentially coerced confessions. Also McNabb-Mallory, prevents delayed arraignment of suspects who are in police

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    David Mccallum Case Study

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After 29 years of being locked up and convicted for murder David McCallum had his conviction thrown out. Both him and his friend Willie Stuckey were convicted after being coerced into giving a false confession foe the kidnapping and murder of a 20-year-old boy in Brooklyn 1985. David McCallum served I personally don’t understand what circumstances could possibly make a person confess to a crime they didn’t commit, however, False and coursed confessions are one of the main factors in wrongful convictions. These false and coursed confessions can be a result of unethical behavior during the interrogations of suspects. In McCallum’s case it was later discovered that the confession was not backed up by physical evidence.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Intolerable Acts of 1774 Since the discovery of the westward lands, the colonies established by England have become increasingly independent and wealthy. British and colonists alike searched for a new life in this haven, which was expected to prosper over the decades. However the thirteen colonies were in isolation and tensions grew with England, the colonists believed, as the nation grew powerful, that they would require more freedom in government authority and trade. In response, England established acts that would regulate colonial power, for instance, the Stamp Act, which taxed stamped paper.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine walking by a sports bar that shut down because it can't sell alcohol. That was a reality in the days of Prohibition. Prohibition was America's attempt at solving many of its alcohol caused issues. Though many people thought it was a good idea, it soon was repealed by Americans as it did not do what it was meant to do, stop the problems, all it did was create more. Prohibition was the banning of anything to do with alcohol, such as trading, possessing, or buying it.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp Exclusionary Rule

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The United States Supreme Court announced their decision on June 19, 1961. The Supreme Court ruled six to three in favor of Mapp, the Court considered the search a violation of the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Chief Justice Warren and Justices Clark, Black, Douglas, Brennan and Stewart agreed the police abused their power against Mapp’s will. Moreover, the Supreme Court applied the exclusionary rule to the case, which means evidence obtained illegally can’t be used in court. The Constitution stated the police need a warrant in order to search a person’s house.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is understandable that most would feel the use of the exclusionary rule allows the criminal element to otherwise go free on what would be perceived as a technicality, however, I would argue that the existence of such a rule only assures law enforcement and its designees conducts their investigations in such a fashion that the methods used to collect information and evidence are above reproach, thus the fear of having information be excluded is not a factor in their investigation. Additionally, it would be highly unlikely that the exclusion of evidence would be to such a degree that a case would allow for a defendant to go free unless sufficient evidence was not available to secure the conviction, to begin with. I would like to believe that, as in my office, there is more than sufficient evidence available to win a case, and that its fate is not dependent on a single source of information or evidence.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ governmental policies known as the War on Drugs contributed to increases of incarceration and arrest rates, notably of African Americans; although substance use and abuse rates of African Americans are lower than that of Whites. Kakade, Duarte, Liu, Fuller, Drucker, Hoven, Fan, and Wu (2012) addressed two main hypotheses: the “differential offending” hypothesis and the “differential treatment” hypothesis. Kakade et. al hypothesized for the “differential offending” hypothesis that overrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities in the juvenile and criminal justice systems reveals racial differences in the prevalence, the seriousness and the consistent engagement in criminal behavior. Kakade et.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Evidence Interpretation Over the years, there have been several cases that have been resolved with a false guilty plea or cases where a guilty party was not convicted of a crime. There are various elements that play a role in solving cases; evidence is a one of these key elements. Many factors can determine if the evidence submitted before a court of law is accurate such as how the evidence is collected, if proper protocell was followed before the laboratory’s handling of the evidence, and if the evidences was accurately processed by the crime scene laboratory by various forensic scientists. Furthermore, with the advances in technology in today’s society, various pieces of evidence such a DNA analysis have been considered a crucial element…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, in the case of Wong Sun V. United States (1963), Wong Sun was coerced to make incriminating statements after agents illegally entered his laundry, but he was later released (Gardner & Anderson, 2016). He eventually confessed voluntarily to transporting heroin, and at his trial he wanted his confession to not be used as evidence because of the improper police conduct (Gardner & Anderson, 2016). But, the U.S Supreme Court stated his confession could be used in court because of the time that has passed between the illegal entry and confession that ultimately eliminated the misconduct (Gardner & Anderson,…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What if you were found guilty of a crime you did not commit, and then to make matters worse you have to loose your life without reason or necessity. The article details a story how a couple of detectives managed to fool a gardener to admitting to a crime he did not commit, just because they fed of his honesty. They claimed they had stacks of evidence against him, and that they just needed his confession. This meant that the farmer after being cornered in by the two detectives admitted to it without ever caring to ask to see the supposed stack of evidence. Simply because the farmer knew of his own drinking problem could have led him to blackout during this event.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “Ordinary Injustice” by Amy Bach, chapter four titled “Show Trial”, describes a number of different cases showing wrongful convictions being processed through the criminal justice system based off of false confessions. In Chicago, there was a nine-year-old girl named Lisa Cabassa was found raped and killed in the back of an alley a couple miles from her home. Two months after the rape and murder of Lisa, a witness named Judy called the police to give her testimony on the crime. Her statement consisted of her telling the police the people involved with the crime were named Michael Evans and Paul Terry, whom were teenagers from the neighborhood. She spotted them with Lisa that night.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However before we begin to talk about the exclusionary rule, one should know what the rule was intended for, and the reasons behind its creation. The rule was introduced to the states in 1961 in the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which states that any evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution will be considered inadmissible in a court of law (Schmalleger & Worrall, 2009). The rule itself was created in the wake police misconduct, which lead to citizens constitutional rights being violated while being investigated for a crime. How the rule effects an prosecution’s case is that by declaring any evidence that was taken in a matter considered in violation of a citizens constitutional rights, the evidence originally obtained, and any evidence…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful conviction has become a notable issue, part of the problem is caused by false confessions. A confession is an acknowledging guilt in writing or by speech. In the courtroom a confession is a powerful form of evidence. There are many cases known to be false confessions to a crime not committed by the person due to mental impairment, the threat of a harsh sentence, and because of coercion. False confessions can be caused by mental impairment an individual to believe that he commit the crime.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Frequent exonerations of innocent parties affect the entire legal system in a myriad of ways. Perhaps no challenge is greater to the integrity of the American criminal justice system than that of the conviction of innocent individuals. Since the1990’s when DNA evidence became more widely known and accepted, a great deal of attention has been focused on wrongly condemned individuals and their post-conviction exonerations. In many of these cases, defendants had been sentenced to death and were awaiting execution.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays