Frequent exonerations of innocent parties affect the entire legal system in a myriad of ways. Perhaps no challenge is greater to the integrity of the American criminal justice system than that of the conviction of innocent individuals. Since the1990’s when DNA evidence became more widely known and accepted, a great deal of attention has been focused on wrongly condemned individuals and their post-conviction exonerations. In many of these cases, defendants had been sentenced to death and were awaiting execution. It is clear convictions of the innocent occur with regularity and with disturbing frequency (Leo, 2005). Frequent and multiple exonerations pose a host of problems for prosecutors, defendants and the public at large. Wrongful
…show more content…
Both organizations have recommend lifelong physical and mental health care be provided for wrongly convicted individuals. These suggestions are especially important as ironically, exonerees often have less access to and resources provided than had they been released after actually committing a crime. The array of services offered to parolees, such as job training, pre-release counseling, substance abuse treatment or assistance with housing are not available to exonerees. With only “gate money” of between $10 and $150 society expects exonerees to successfully reenter society, find housing and employment. Exonerees who have been compensated above $500,000 have been shown to commit offenses at a significantly lower rate than those not compensated at all, or those compensated at amounts beneath that level (Mandery, et al., …show more content…
Wrongful convictions predictably end investigations and lower the probability the true offender will be identified and convicted.
2. Potential offenders may be less likely to forgo opportunities to commit crimes in the future, concerned others may take the opportunity, and they will be wrongly convicted.
3. The possibility of being sanctioned for criminal acts may seem less threatening when there are possibilities the sanctions will be added to those of wrongful convictions.Researchers have found exposure to information about the lack of deterrence from wrongful convictions suppresses support for capital punishment (Lambert & Clark, 2001).
Additionally, researchers have found exposure to information about the lack of deterrence from wrongful convictions suppresses support for capital punishment (Lambert & Clark, 2001). Wrongfully convicted and exonerated individuals are victims in the truest sense. While theoretically, wrongful convictions might be seen as an unintended consequence of our adversarial system of justice, they come as a big cost. Despite the private cost, the public cost is the challenge to the “legitimacy and integrity” of our justice system (Zalman, 2011). The consequences of wrongful convictions and exonerations undermine the reliability and public’s confidence in the justice system as a whole (Battaglia, 2011) and in our democratic society, the impact of public opinion is
Both organizations have recommend lifelong physical and mental health care be provided for wrongly convicted individuals. These suggestions are especially important as ironically, exonerees often have less access to and resources provided than had they been released after actually committing a crime. The array of services offered to parolees, such as job training, pre-release counseling, substance abuse treatment or assistance with housing are not available to exonerees. With only “gate money” of between $10 and $150 society expects exonerees to successfully reenter society, find housing and employment. Exonerees who have been compensated above $500,000 have been shown to commit offenses at a significantly lower rate than those not compensated at all, or those compensated at amounts beneath that level (Mandery, et al., …show more content…
Wrongful convictions predictably end investigations and lower the probability the true offender will be identified and convicted.
2. Potential offenders may be less likely to forgo opportunities to commit crimes in the future, concerned others may take the opportunity, and they will be wrongly convicted.
3. The possibility of being sanctioned for criminal acts may seem less threatening when there are possibilities the sanctions will be added to those of wrongful convictions.Researchers have found exposure to information about the lack of deterrence from wrongful convictions suppresses support for capital punishment (Lambert & Clark, 2001).
Additionally, researchers have found exposure to information about the lack of deterrence from wrongful convictions suppresses support for capital punishment (Lambert & Clark, 2001). Wrongfully convicted and exonerated individuals are victims in the truest sense. While theoretically, wrongful convictions might be seen as an unintended consequence of our adversarial system of justice, they come as a big cost. Despite the private cost, the public cost is the challenge to the “legitimacy and integrity” of our justice system (Zalman, 2011). The consequences of wrongful convictions and exonerations undermine the reliability and public’s confidence in the justice system as a whole (Battaglia, 2011) and in our democratic society, the impact of public opinion is