The Importance Of The Exclusionary Rule

Improved Essays
However before we begin to talk about the exclusionary rule, one should know what the rule was intended for, and the reasons behind its creation. The rule was introduced to the states in 1961 in the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which states that any evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution will be considered inadmissible in a court of law (Schmalleger & Worrall, 2009). The rule itself was created in the wake police misconduct, which lead to citizens constitutional rights being violated while being investigated for a crime. How the rule effects an prosecution’s case is that by declaring any evidence that was taken in a matter considered in violation of a citizens constitutional rights, the evidence originally obtained, and any evidence

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bma Wurie Case Study

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The second case featured a man, Brima Wurie, who was arrested after a couple of police officers caught him in the middle of a drug deal. The officers seized two of Wurie’s cell phones and brought him back to the police station. Wurie’s flip phone kept receiving a call from the same number and the officer’s tracked it back to his apartment, where they “215 grams of crack cocaine and a loaded firearm.” Wurie was kept for drug and firearm charges that wouldn’t have been discovered if not for information presented by his flip phone during the warrantless search. The District Court denied Wurie’s request, which asked for the evidence obtained through the search to be thrown out, and then he was convicted.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States Constitution’s 11th amendment also states that an officer must show that they had probable cause in order to have lawsuits brought against them dismissed. In situations involving police use of excessive force the 11th amendment; protections have had multiple successes due to death caused by a police officer. A majority of cases heard regarding probable cause often lead to a dismissal of charges, but the penalty is usually in monetary form as an end result of a lawsuit. The 11th amendment granted diversity jurisdiction to the federal courts, allowed lawsuits between a State and Citizens of another State called, Sovereign Immunity. The law is ethical and morally correct, but not successful in assuring police are charged…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case Brief Of Us Vs Leon

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The exclusionary rule isn’t considered a constitutional right. It’s a judicially created to safeguard the Fourth Amendment rights through the deterrent effects, making the costs and benefits of the excluding inherently trustworthy and tangible evidence which has to be weighed, and remedy must be applied where costs is acceptable and the deterrent effect is…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The expenses of applying the exclusionary principle on habeas were nearly incredible. We contemplated that doing as such would not just reject solid proof and occupy consideration from the focal inquiry of blame, however would likewise interfere with general society interest. Rule of Law: The Court of Appeals affirmed the District’s Court ruling. Reference: Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680, 680, 113 S. Ct. 1745, 1747, 123 L. Ed.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police officers did not have the right to approach the porch of Jardines’ house to find evidence, this is know as exclusionary rule,improperly gathered evidence may not be introduce in a criminal…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    cases also relates to the Fourth Amendment, which requires "search and seizure" of evidence, also known as the exclusionary rule (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). The exclusionary rule states that, “Evidence must be collected and analyzed without violating the rights of the defendant; if the rights of the defendant are violated, then the evidence will not be upheld in court” (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). Savana Redding is a 13-year-old eighth grader enrolled at Safford Middle School. She is an honor student who has no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In view of the modification of the exclusionary rule, the Court of Appeals' judgment cannot stand in this case. Only respondent Leon contended that no reasonably well trained police officer could have believed that there existed probable cause to search his house. However, the record establishes that the police officer’s reliance on the state-court judge's determination of…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court case, Nelson v. Colorado, the judgment revolves around the constitutionality of the Colorado Exoneration Act. This act stated that monetary fines paid due to conviction charges can only be returned to the exonerated individual if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent of the accused crime. The constitutionality of this law was debated and in question in regards to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. I concur in the recent Supreme Court decision that the Colorado Exoneration Act should be ruled as unconstitutional. I am in assent with this recent decision that the current Colorado law is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects United States citizen’s right to a fair trial, undermines the legitimacy and authority of a criminal court proceeding, and also contradicts the precedent established in various courts that…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. After framing the constitution it seems that there was a need to change certain guidelines in constitution, Hence they came up with the term Amendments (changes in documents). in 4th Amendment it talks about the unreasonable/unnecessary searches of someone's possessions or seizures (also arrest) which is against the right to privacy. The scope of seizures/Searched should be limited and only warrant should be issued by law enforcement officer before police taking necessary action. in 1792 US State secretary Sir Jefferson, Thomas declared the amendment adoption.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They appealed so that they could still use the evidence under the “good faith exception” to the exclusionary rule. This means that if a cop goes to search a private property under the impression that the warrant is valid but turns out to be invalid the evidence will still be used in a court of law because they were not trying to take advantage of their power. In another case New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985) a student was searched by the school vice principal and she was found having cigarettes and marijuana. She was searched because they had evidence that she had smoked in school in the past and also that she sold marijuana.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The U.S. Constitution was established to give an understanding of the principles and the laws of the nation. The U.S. Constitution contains twenty-seven amendments. The first ten amendments are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was created to protect rights of citizens of the United States and balance the power of the government. The four amendments of the Bill of Rights that deal with criminal procedure are the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mapp v. Ohio, after reading the case file this case should not have ever made it to the Supreme Court or any court in the land. This case was doomed from the beginning due to police misconduct that has opened a crack in a door for criminals to slide through. Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? I do believe that court’s ruling regarding Mapp v. Ohio affect the day-to-day police work of our Officers. Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays