Knowledge itself can be referred to as personal knowledge applied by prior experiences, or classified as shared knowledge when demonstrating qualities worth of admiration or considerable importance, through practical or theoretical circumstances. The purpose of knowledge application is to generate a result, where human beings recognise their roots to give value to their future actions. Value is a very subjective word that can have a scope of interpretations regarding how can it be measured. The application of knowledge acquired in the world, implements value to distinctive Areas of Knowledge such as Ethics and Indigenous Knowledge Systems.
There are several possibilities of knowledge application in different AOK, where distinct WOK can play …show more content…
When considering daily-basis situations, moral principles can be put into practice. A real life situation is the United Nations that is a well-known intergovernmental organization, which deals with issues of global significance. The foundation includes all countries to participate in meetings with representatives of different religions and beliefs. Their speeches don’t demonstrate political or economical position, as it is a global institution where countries get into agreement of the values when resolving conflicts. They develop policies and laws to generate global Human rights. Personal knowledge can be applied through several distinct WOK, where it is usually subjective knowledge, as individuals have to evaluate the application of this knowledge in real life situations. Contrasting, shared knowledge can be generally classified as relative since external factors influence and many people have to be in agreement before its value is assessed. Particularly in ethics, knowledge is very challenging to classify as people have different perceptions of what is right and wrong. The methodology of Ethics is a quite interesting one as it assimilates with the one of reason, emotion and intuition. Emotion …show more content…
In 2006, I experienced a trip to Kenya where I visited the Masai Tribu community that have a different system of knowledge application. They pursue a different approach to the majority of social groups or cultures regarding the knowledge framework. They utilize language in the verbal form as a WOK in order to communicate with others amongst their community. This makes it very challenging to generate shared knowledge as there is no written text, thus having no guaranteed storage and transmission of knowledge. This proportions a high risk of the extinction of the indigenous knowledge system and language, contracting language diversity. They also pursue very flexible and empirical characteristics, as they are able to change from a set of methods or concepts to another, as well as utilizing sense perception taking into consideration a wide range of phenomena possibilities. Their scope is very holistic when applying knowledge acquired in different aspects. Contrastingly, members of oral cultures argue that interrogation is always open for discussion. Its flexibility can also be questioned due to the tension between knowledge for its local conditions and its ability to change adaptation. They do not utilize reason as a main WOK when making decisions and conclusions, as they are very straightforward and do not analyse alternatives extensively. Another
There are several possibilities of knowledge application in different AOK, where distinct WOK can play …show more content…
When considering daily-basis situations, moral principles can be put into practice. A real life situation is the United Nations that is a well-known intergovernmental organization, which deals with issues of global significance. The foundation includes all countries to participate in meetings with representatives of different religions and beliefs. Their speeches don’t demonstrate political or economical position, as it is a global institution where countries get into agreement of the values when resolving conflicts. They develop policies and laws to generate global Human rights. Personal knowledge can be applied through several distinct WOK, where it is usually subjective knowledge, as individuals have to evaluate the application of this knowledge in real life situations. Contrasting, shared knowledge can be generally classified as relative since external factors influence and many people have to be in agreement before its value is assessed. Particularly in ethics, knowledge is very challenging to classify as people have different perceptions of what is right and wrong. The methodology of Ethics is a quite interesting one as it assimilates with the one of reason, emotion and intuition. Emotion …show more content…
In 2006, I experienced a trip to Kenya where I visited the Masai Tribu community that have a different system of knowledge application. They pursue a different approach to the majority of social groups or cultures regarding the knowledge framework. They utilize language in the verbal form as a WOK in order to communicate with others amongst their community. This makes it very challenging to generate shared knowledge as there is no written text, thus having no guaranteed storage and transmission of knowledge. This proportions a high risk of the extinction of the indigenous knowledge system and language, contracting language diversity. They also pursue very flexible and empirical characteristics, as they are able to change from a set of methods or concepts to another, as well as utilizing sense perception taking into consideration a wide range of phenomena possibilities. Their scope is very holistic when applying knowledge acquired in different aspects. Contrastingly, members of oral cultures argue that interrogation is always open for discussion. Its flexibility can also be questioned due to the tension between knowledge for its local conditions and its ability to change adaptation. They do not utilize reason as a main WOK when making decisions and conclusions, as they are very straightforward and do not analyse alternatives extensively. Another