As stated by medical ethicist Arthur Caplan, a program that is not 100% accurate should not be responsible for allocating medical resources (Thompson & Hickey, 2011). In truth, there is no certainty on patient survival regardless of the situation. For instance, two patients with similar injuries arrive at the emergency room. Medical staff use RIP and determine that the older victim has the highest likelihood of survival, while the child’s fragile body has minimal chance. When life-saving measures are taken to save the older victim’s life, the unexpected occurs. The older victim suffers complications resulting in death. Now we have the death of two individuals when there should have been none. Computer programs such as RIP are intended to be used as a tool. However, because of dependence on technology, doctors facing an emergency situation place a patient’s best interest at
As stated by medical ethicist Arthur Caplan, a program that is not 100% accurate should not be responsible for allocating medical resources (Thompson & Hickey, 2011). In truth, there is no certainty on patient survival regardless of the situation. For instance, two patients with similar injuries arrive at the emergency room. Medical staff use RIP and determine that the older victim has the highest likelihood of survival, while the child’s fragile body has minimal chance. When life-saving measures are taken to save the older victim’s life, the unexpected occurs. The older victim suffers complications resulting in death. Now we have the death of two individuals when there should have been none. Computer programs such as RIP are intended to be used as a tool. However, because of dependence on technology, doctors facing an emergency situation place a patient’s best interest at