Should Death Penalty Stay Essay

Improved Essays
Should the Death Penalty Stay? Death is certainly the ultimate punishment. The death penalty needs to be implemented in our society because it is the most terminal punishment for the most horrific crimes. A few years back, i was coming home from school. It had been a great day, just as they normally had been that school year. I walked into my living room, to see that my mother was staring in awe at the television with CNN blaring. There had been a huge terror attack in Boston that day. It was all over the news even though It had been recent. There wasn’t a lot of credible information being passed around. I put my bag down, and watched with the rest of the country as the horror unfolded on live television. These events made me think that capital …show more content…
It is currently legal in 31 states and not in 19 including Washington D.C. In some cases, the states had gotten rid of it, but then decided that they needed it because of some crime that had taken place and the public thought that the guilty deserved a more serving crime than just prison (Death Penalty). In the beginning of the the judicial system, the court would have a normal jury and judge decide, but later decided that anyone who commits a capital crime or serving a capital punishment would be judged in front of a grand jury, except for a militia or military offense (Death …show more content…
How are we going to afford everything and pay for this person to sit in prison for the rest of their life. How much is it going to cost us? Who pays for it? Palmer said in his article about capital punishment that, “Resources are a major factor, although many prosecutors don’t publicly admit it. By some estimates, seeking death adds at least $1 million to the cost of a murder trial, and some death penalty cases cost 20 times as much as the average life-without-parole prosecution.” Many people would agree that it isn’t worth the money to seek the death penalty and instead just pay for the person to stay in prison for the rest of their life. However, others like Don Hambidge say that, “ Safety is better than convenience.” If the person going to prison is going there for life, and not having any chance of seeing the outside world again, and convicted of killing someone else, what would stop them from not killing or hurting someone else in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is something that has changed the law system worldwide, it has been used for thousands of years, at the beginning of its early use it was well used for most crimes like stealing, blasphemy and killing if they were caught, back then the value of a human life was…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty isn’t a product of modern thought, in fact; it has existed ever since the first civilizations. Therefore it might be considered as a barbaric feat that we would’ve gotten rid of, nevertheless in America the majority of the states are still actively putting convicts on death row for the crimes they’ve committed. Even though it is unethical to take someone’s life, it is for the greater purpose. Some might argue that it is immoral and…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the rest of the states that it remains legal in. “The death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights.”(Insert Citation) The U.S.A is one of the only nine countries in the world to have carried out an execution every year, in the years 2009 and 2013. The other countries that still carry out the death penalty are Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen. There are a few reasons as to why it should be abolished. The first reason would be race issues. The reason race is an important reason for it to be abolished is because the races can only recognize differences in their own race vs other races. The second reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is due to mental illness. People with a mental illness who are put on death row are at a disadvantage because, at the time they committed the crime they aren’t always fully cognitive. The third reason as to why the death penalty should be abolished is because of DNA exonerations. With new technologies old death row inmates are being…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital punishment is defined as the legal authorization of killing someone as a form of punishment for committing a crime. In the United States, the death penalty is almost always exclusively used for the crime of murder. In 1972, in Furman v. Georgia, ' the United States Supreme Court invalidated every death penalty statute in the United States. Currently, there are 31 states who still use the death penalty and 19 who have abolished it. On August 2, 2016, Delaware become the latest of states to overturn their death penalty policy.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lloyd Turner Death Penalty

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Throughout history, people have condoned capital punishment and believe it to be a proper punishment for certain crimes. However, like with anything, there has been increasing scrutiny behind the death penalty. Capital punishment is the legal and politically correct way to refer to the death penalty. The death penalty has been around for thousands of years and has been performed in many different ways. Throughout time, the laws and rules surrounding this form of punishment have been altered and changed, and in many places, it has even been abolished. There have been many court cases in America revolving the death penalty and whether it should be abolished. It has been argued and even attempted to be abolished all together…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty shouldn’t be allowed in the United States because it costs too much to execute them rather than putting them in prison. The amount of times they have executed the wrong person makes a big error in our system.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    settle death penalty cases with skyrocketing funds. Nick Gillespie discusses these principles in his video called: “Three Reasons to Get Rid of the Death Penalty”. He states that since 1980, California has spent over four billion dollars on death penalty cases; yet has only executed thirteen inmates. The U.S. also annually dishes out 134 million dollars per case concerning the death penalty. This is far more expensive than the cost that would be covered for incarcerating the criminals for life without parole (Gillespie). It is inherently obvious that the death penalty has been and will always be, for the remainder of its implementation, a shaky approach to resolving issues. It is very expensive and has many missing parts to why we even keep it around. These reasons hold true to the fact that the national abolishment of the death penalty is the optimal option in pushing towards a better…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that there is a better way to sentence someone rather then sentence them to death. I think there should be no death penalty because one, it costs way too much. Second, we are taking a life, someone’s child. Finally, the poor are more likely to get the death penalty. There are many more reasons why we should get rid of it but these are the main reasons.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Almost 40 years ago, death penalty was abolished in Australia. Today, there has been a lot of debate as to reintroducing the capital punishment for severe crimes in Australia. Some would agree to give death penalty for major crimes and some would say life time imprisonment would be a better option. Criminals feel empowered when crime is punished lightly and crime proliferates. So, death penalty is a possible solution to lower down the crime rates and to give proper punishment for serious crimes in Australia.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for as long as civilizations have been around, but is it wrong? Many people will argue that it is immoral, that the government can not and should not have the power to decide whether someone lives or dies. Many others will argue that it is necessary, whether it is immoral or not, as a punishment for those who commit heinous crimes, like mass murder, treason, terroristic attacks, and anything related to these three acts in any kind of way. So if about fifty percent of people argue that it is wrong, while the other fifty percent argue that it is right, than who is correct?…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Death Penalty

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Those who oppose may propose that the cost to execute is far more than sentencing a convict to life in prison. Another argument could focus on the convict being found innocent by the use of appeals. Those who are against the death penalty will no doubt argue that the death penalty costs too much and that life in prison is more just. “The death penalty costs three times as much as permanent imprisonment” (Mitchell). The death penalty happens to cost so much because of how lengthy the process is, showing that changes need to be made in order to make it more effective and cheaper. The major cost of being on death row results from the trial and the appeals. “Even if the California Supreme Court affirms the death sentence, the inmate can initiate appeals on separate constitutional issues. Called Writs of Habeas Corpus, these appeals may be heard in both state and federal courts and can be used to introduce new information or evidence presented at trial” (Brown; Kernan). This bill will strictly limit the amount of appeals the criminal has, shortening the time he has on death row and lowering the total cost of the whole process. Also, people do not realize that the money they are paying for prisons goes to the prisoner’s meals, shelter, and other undeserved luxuries that criminals under the death penalty should not be able to enjoy for what they did to get there. A murder does…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics