Is Ethics Right Or Wrong

Great Essays
The foundations of morality and ethics have been philosophically studied for well over the past millennium. Ethics and morals pertain to what is “right” and “wrong” behavior. Although these terms are often used interchangeably, they have different foundations by which they are developed. Ethics is the innate understanding of what is right and wrong. Morals are the principles that individuals develop regarding what is right and wrong behavior that are provided by external sources such as religious or societal standards of behavior. In a sense, it can be said that morals are a value system and a knowledge of what is right, whereas ethics is what is right and wrong.
Ethics goes beyond the limitations of culture, religion, and time as it embodies
…show more content…
Contrarily, I do not feel that cruel or unethical actions should or can be used to create good or favorable results. Good ethics and morals are a vital aspect in good leadership and a leader cannot use unethical methods to justify a good outcome. For example, I believe that it is not possible for war to ever create peace; that is to say, an act that is bad or evil cannot promote good as violence can only breed violence. Niccolo Machiavelli coined the term “the ends justifies the means no matter the cruel means to achieve them” (Hefele, 1933). Machiavelli also believed that people are generally bad and are only good out of necessity. However, I believe that most people have a desire to be good and ethical and that unethical behaviors are most often carried out for personal gain. Though I do feel unethical actions are a result of an underlying evil or bad personality trait that serves as a driving force. It is most often likely that this type of behavior is learned or developed through …show more content…
Leaders should always strive to chose a path that is right in their efforts towards the end goal and I feel that there is always an option to make good and right decisions. When leaders are found to make unethical decisions, the impact it has on those they are leading is unfavorable. Followers will likely lose trust and faith in leaders who are found to make unethical decisions and ultimately lose desire to follow the guidance of that so called leader. Unethical behaviors represent a lack of respect for those that are affected by the unethical actions. Kant believed that it is our duty to treat others with respect and that we should "act so as to treat people always as ends in themselves, never as mere means” (Bailey, 2011). Unethical actions in leadership seems to be an implication that the leader sees others as a means to their own goals and that they are not interested in what would be the greatest benefit of those they are leading. Beauchamp and Bowie (1988) pointed out that "Persons must be treated as having their autonomously established goals and must never be treated purely as the means to another person 's

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Kant requests for people to pursue their duty because it is their duty. “Act of that maxim which can at the same time have for its object itself as a universal law of nature” (Perry 533). Kant is stating that if you are the only person that can complete the task or duty then you should not do it. He does not want us doing things like committing suicide because that is not consider a good duty and he does not want people doing things that cannot be consist of as a universal duty. Kant wants us to realize that we should only complete a task or duty if we approve that other people can do it as well.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People don’t like being judged, which results in people not taking responsibility for their actions. I disagree with how Fromm relies on the comparison of our options to our humanistic conscious, morals and the laws of humanity to guide our actions. What if our values are subpar? If someone has little to no morality and believes that he is bettering the future of humanity with his actions, then according to Fromm’s logic, they have justified themselves by obeying their personal morals and how they interpreted the laws of humanity. This could mean that a seral killer felt that his actions were justified as an act of freedom against authority.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This shows a key difference between the principle of utility, as an action isn’t required with Kant, they’re merely acceptable. The next underlying principle with Kant’s theory is the principle of humanity. This is put as, always treat a human being (yourself included) as an end, and never as a mere means. The term “mere means” relates to an individual’s autonomy coming secondary to yours, deceiving someone, or not respecting another person’s goals. “End in itself” would be the opposite, to respect an individual’s autonomy and what their trying to…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian ethics is a form of deontological ethics, meaning evaluating actions to see whether they are morally just or not. Kantian ethics is a type of deontological ethics because it is the view that we have absolute moral duties that are determined by reason and not affected by the consequences. Valjean, if shown from this view, would turn himself in. He would know that it would be morally wrong to lie and that lying is never justified, even if the townspeople have prospered so much under his ruling. He would know that morality must be grounded in reason and that an innocent man must not be put away for an action Valjean himself has committed.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When implementing deontology in a practical sense, there seems to be a focus on reason at the expense of the character of the person themselves, leading to a sort of moral absolutism – meaning that moral principles should always be obeyed regardless of context or the consequences which may result. When following laws blindly of the context or consequences, there seems to be the possibility of making a decision which may abide by the moral principles deontology puts forth, but practically seems to lack a genuine understanding of the situation itself. Aristotelian virtue ethics deemphasizes rules and puts concentration on the character of the person who is acting. However, virtue ethics is not without its potential issues as well. If practically implemented, which characteristics actually qualify as virtues will differ from culture to culture.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is the moral that every profession must have. Each profession has its ethics that are distinct from another profession 's ethics. Just as morals are to a community so are ethics to a profession. Some acts may not be ethical but are lawful while some may be unlawful yet they are moral. Therefore, to define an ethical behavior, one must first understand what ethics is.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author also expressed that humans would be in a worse situation supposing they merely make calculations of what is best to do. Humans have a tendency to be frustrated or uplifted, and at the same time, we are responsible for our actions and behaviors. When Rachels implied how it is impossible for love and friendship to be separated from morality, his argument appeared to be rather invalid. After all, we first consider how we should talk or act in front of others, so we can be sure our conduct would not be detrimental to our reputation, as well as our…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Normative theories of ethics are meant to assist in the discovery of what is right and wrong. These moral theories rely on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong. Some normative theories include utilitarianism, virtue ethics, W.D. Ross’s intuitonism, the categorical imperative, or deontology. Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality has to do the practical level of action and tries to answer the question what should I do ? ; ethics with the theoretical level of reflection and attempts to answer questions such as what is the moral? How reflection applies to everyday life? Begin to make ethical answering the first question: what is the moral? To define it: moral actions, moral norms, moral values and moral dilemma.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that if an action is taken in good faith, and the desired outcome positive and beneficial to society, it must be taken, even if that means that a member of that society is harmed in doing so. If it will serve the greater good, then any action is permissible. Kant, however believes that never, under any circumstances, must one go against what is morally right. Even if an action such as lying or causing an individual harm is taken for the benefit of society, it is not okay. Bentham's utilitarian views on punishment better serve society as government…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics