Elizabeth Johnson's View Of The Doctrine Of Trinity

Improved Essays
According to Barth, the Doctrine of Trinity states that the “God in Himself is eternally God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit” and he cannot be judged for his work and activity. Catherine LaCugna, Sallie McFague, and Elizabeth Johnson have views that contradict with Barth’s views.
Catherine LaCaugna’s thinking is not shaped by who God really is. She says that there is a mystery of communion. This mystery of communion includes both humans and God as beloved partners. She also refuses the existence of economic and immanent trinity and says that there is only “oikonomia”, which is “the concrete realization of the mystery of God.” She refuses trinity in se and says that “the life of god is not something that belongs to God alone”, it is in relation
…show more content…
As she has a feminist approach, she says that God should be emasculated for the equality of women. For her, God is neither male nor female. It is clear that her understanding of God is not derived from scriptures because neither the scriptures nor the doctrine of trinity ever identifies God as a man. Elizabeth Johnson’s idea of understanding God is not derived by placing God in the center, but is derived from placing the women’s experience as the starting point to understand God. Her understanding of God is completely against Barth’s understanding. Barth would never think of God as a man. His understanding is based on keeping God in center and thus is not derived from the human experiences. He says we can refer to God only as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And we can refer to God as the trinity because of the revelation of God in history. When we try to understand God from human experiences we only get self-serving answers, like Elizabeth Johnson gets. Pantheism is a belief that the universe and nature are God. She clearly falls into pantheism because she defines God in terms of human nature. One cannot understand God based on human nature because God cannot be limited by human relationships and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The same goes for God’s feet, nostrils, and all other attributes of God; they are simply analogies to help humans understand Godvin our fallen state. Christians must not “consider our God to be a male…because He is called God and Father,” but instead understand that God is simply being described in a way that humans may never fully understand on this side of eternity. Gregory poses the question “[is the] spirit neuter…because it has nothing to do with generation?” The absurdity is clear, which leads to the conclusion that the Biblical authors use analogical language to describe the person of…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “God is that which no greater can be conceived” is a statement that rules out any credible support other than from Anselm own Christian devotion. Anselm makes this evident when he states “I may understand that you exist as we believe you to exist, and that you are what we believe you to be” (Anselm, 7) this means that Anselm alone doesn’t know the clear nature of God but he is able to make simple inferences for this proof. So how can we come to know that God is none greater than can be conceived if we are designating our own definition of a maximally perfect being. Anselm portrays that God can be known solely from reasoning in thoughts rather than from impression of god himself in our knowledge. According to Hume and his empirical beliefs in “Dialogues concerning Natural Religion”, “The only manner to prove that a being a priori is if its inverse entails a contradiction” (Hume, XI).…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Demism Theory Of Religion

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They believed that God brought them here and that Typology should be use to interpret his message. It didn’t take long for a new way of thinking to emerge. Deism doctrine states that there is a God. However, God has no control over our lives and it differs from religious believes by not following the Holly book or the idea of more than one God, does not have daily interactions with the world he created, and that redemption and the after life does not exist. Deism was the ideology of our founding fathers, the theory that God is uncaring and uninvolved.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantian Theory Of Religion

    • 2435 Words
    • 10 Pages

    If this is so then, the Kingdom of God could not currently be established, nor could it ever be established. The Kingdom of God, according to the teachings of Jesus is free from evil. Evil still exists on earth, so there could be no Kingdom now. Also, according to Kant, man can never achieve the highest good, so the Kingdom of God on Earth could never be established, because there is no evil in the Kingdom of God according to the teachings of Jesus, who Kant believes we should learn from. If Kant means that the kingdom is to come then how can it come if we cannot fully reach the highest good?…

    • 2435 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is human language capable of speaking about God? How? Under what circumstances? Indeed, deeply religious man and women have come to say that God exists and that He communicates with His most beloved creation and that man is able to respond to Him. However, the problem rests in that God is ineffable, which implies that nothing can really be said about Him acutely.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Doctrine Of Justification

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages

    We are not saved by the good works we do, or the actions that we take, but rather through our faith in Jesus Christ to freely redeem us. Sproul indicates, “His grace was making available to those who would receive it passively, not those who would achieve it actively, but that would receive it by faith, and by which a person could be reconciled to a holy and righteous God (Sproul, 2016). Luther understood that nothing we could do would earn our justification. On our own we are incapable of ever earning it and this is what Paul is getting at in Romans. We are saved, not because we deserve it, but rather because God wants us to be and gives us the gift of his grace freely.…

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible. They do not acknowledge the possibility of revelation of God. Geisler argues that Ayer's idea is also self-contradictory because it is neither definitional nor…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Union with Christ Theological Definition: The theological explanation of our union with Christ is three-in-one God, Jesus Christ, and the Fruit of the Spirit (Trinity). Church leaders communicate how a person can build a personal relationship with God through the Word and our Savior, Jesus Christ. However, when we exclude the Spirit of Jesus, then His death serves no purpose or reason for humankind. Therefore, we can rely on Scripture…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Higher Consciousness

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jesus taught how to get in touch with God through your higher self--the "holy spirit," the higher consciousness part of you. Father Moore said, "Instead of worshipping God, use the powers you were given! Be the glory of God. Help everyone else be the glory of God." Jesus was never meant to be an intermediary between the people and God and he was not supposed to be the world 's saviour - at least not in the way that people have been conditioned to believe by the world 's religions.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Value Of Grace

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9) The grace of God, the ‘loving-kindness’ of God, the ‘favor’ of God, is never to be understood as something that is manifest among men based on anything apart from the sheer ‘benevolence’ of the LORD. By grace are you saved, if you are saved at all. By grace are you saved through faith, or through believing God. Yet the ‘grace’ of God prevents our laying claim to any personal worthiness or our taking any credit, and the faith is a gift and not something that we possess apart from the giving of God (Romans 4:1-5, Ephesians 2:8-9, 2 Peter 1:1, Philippians 1:29). God saves a soul by His own will and power alone and simply because He is pleased to do so.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays