Not editing on Wikipedia in months has been an astonishment. I have been turning my head to the Wikia Fandom where countless Wikias are created (James Bond, Wookiepedia, Literature Wikia, etc.). They are so much better off than Wikipedia and have more lenient policies than the strict Wikipedia ones which make it difficult for the common man to create a single article. In contrast to Wikipedia, it's so much easier for anyone to create an article as long as they stick to what a particular Wikia is about. This particular policy is beneficial to fans since they don't have to have any of the articles removed or their edits reverted. What's even better, you can create your own!!!!!!:D Since there will be no one to nag you about the articles create
…show more content…
You Wikipedia critics don't like enhancing anyone else's ideas (particularly fans'), you all just like to delete, revert, revert and delete 100 more times so their ideas vanish out of existence. It's not only to enforce Wikipedias policies, but it seems to be a hobby to your hoard since you enjoy the sport of deleting and reverting ideas of die hard fans. So, I'm sitting on top of the diamond mountain celebrating my contributions to the wikias I've joined and created with my ideas still intact with minimal interference with the support of several users who admire me, compared to Wikipedia who is 100 times more of an interference than the Wikia Fandom. I have joined several wikias and contributed more to the 007 wikia than ever before than the other wikias I've joined and created. At least I own something in the Fandom, compared to Wikipedia where no one owns anything. In 5 wikis I have made over 100 edits so far and my top wiki, I've made 904 edits. …show more content…
I tell you Wikipedia isn't trustworthy since anyone can edit here, they can say that the moon is made out of cheese. No schoolteacher or professor would recommend Wikipedia to their student bodies.
You Wikipedia critics don't like enhancing anyone else's ideas (particularly fans'), you all just like to delete, revert, revert and delete 100 more times so their ideas vanish out of existence. It's not only to enforce Wikipedias policies, but it seems to be a hobby to your hoard since you enjoy the sport of deleting and reverting ideas of die hard fans. So, I'm sitting on top of the diamond mountain celebrating my contributions to the wikias I've joined and created with my ideas still intact with minimal interference with the support of several users who admire me, compared to Wikipedia who is 100 times more of an interference than the Wikia Fandom. I have joined several wikias and contributed more to the 007 wikia than ever before than the other wikias I've joined and created. At least I own something in the Fandom, compared to Wikipedia where no one owns anything. In 5 wikis I have made over 100 edits so far and my top wiki, I've made 904 edits. …show more content…
I tell you Wikipedia isn't trustworthy since anyone can edit here, they can say that the moon is made out of cheese. No schoolteacher or professor would recommend Wikipedia to their student bodies.