Theories Of Capital Punishment

Good Essays
Almost every person in the world is familiar with the term capital punishment. Capital punishment is simply punishment by death. The inmate would have had to commit a capital crime or a crime that would justify the killing. In 2015 alone there have been 27 inmates who have died by lethal injection. Some agree with capital punishment while others feel no person has the right to take someone’s life. I will be explaining how the retributive theory and utilitarian theory both agree with capital punishment to a point, but have very different viewpoints on the reasons for doing it. While also presenting theories that are against capital punishment such as the virtue theory. Based on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy the retributive theory …show more content…
Punishment is justified, for a retributivist, solely by the fact that those receiving it deserve it.” For a retributivist the reasoning for killing a criminal would be justified, because they committed an act that makes it acceptable for them to be killed. An eye for an eye is a phrase used with retributive theory. Another theory that also is for capital punishment is the utilitarian theory. For a utilitarian there reasoning for capital punishment is somewhat different. They feel that capital punishment is justified by a purported ability to achieve future social benefits, such as crime reduction. The killing of a person is meant to deter future criminal from committing the same act because they can also be put to death. The utilitarian theory focuses on making moral decisions based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. While both of these theories are for capital punishment one theory that is somewhat against it is the virtue theory of ethics. The virtue theory “is an approach to Ethics that emphasizes an individual 's character as the key element of ethical thinking, rather than rules about the acts …show more content…
In contrast if he was already a criminal they would consider it. Since the virtue theory bases its decision on the person morals it’s very hard to see this as a suitable way determine if capital punishment is right. Out of the three theory’s I presented to you I will explain my own opinion on capital punishment and which theory best fits it. First of all I agree that capital punishment should exist. I feel this way because there are crimes in this would that if anybody thought of doing that being sentenced to death should cross there mind. The utilitarian theory is a perfect example of how I feel capital punishment should be looked at. I feel this way, because of the reasons behind the theory. Since it is forward-looking and hopes to deter further criminals from committing the same act it shows that the main focus is not the killing itself, but the future criminals who might commit the same act. Anyone can give their own opinion on which theory is morally right, but when it comes down to which theory is best for society utilitarian theory is by far the best. With the retributive theory its only focus is the inmate and the act he/she committed. There is no intention of preventing future criminals from committing the same

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment. Now of course as with all other controversial topics not everyone is on board with this idea. One of those people is named Michael Welch. Welch believes that the death penalty should be abolished. Welch also believes that there are two reasons for the dealt penalty, one being…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nathanson believes that human dignity matters, we may punish people for their crimes but deprive them everything which is what the death penalty does (Nathanson, p.544). The other side to this argument is to retain the death penalty, Haag who is a supporter, defends the morality of the death…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This was to be enforced by the state in order to prevent conflict that may arise through the natural self-concerned tendencies. Thomas Hobbes stated that crime could still occur and that the benefit of committing a crime should be outdone by the punishment. This would be applied as a form of deterrence. (Onwudiwe, I. et al., 2005). “It is better to prevent crime than to punish it” (Beccaria, 1764/1963:93).…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This essay will distinguish between the theories of punishment illustrated by Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant and will explain why I oppose Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian approach on punishment. Although Bentham and Kant did not have a concrete answer to the methods of issuing punishment, Bentham’s theory consists of more questionable and empty statements. Kant, in my opinion, has a more realistic view of life-based on the innate actions of human beings as opposed to Bentham utilitarian theory. Therefore, it is a more ethical decision to side with the views and system of punishment offered by Kant. Jeremy Bentham has a very complex view of the theory of punishment and the procedure of when and how to induce punishment within society.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He stands firm on his first argument, saying that the death penalty is not only the best but the only deterrent to crime. Ernest says the objection of life imprisonment is a light slap on the wrist and is not geared enough. Imprisonment only gives murderers more time to plot and scheme it does not change other criminal minds about making the same mistake. Some opponents of Haag stand argue that people have a right to life and morally we should not use capital punishment. An objection that Haag uses is that the right to life is forfeited if the crime that is broken is severe enough.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Deterrence

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retribution is another ideology of pro-death penalty advocates, which refers to punishment for offenders that is equal to the crime committed. Incarcerating an offender to minimize their ability to re-offend is known as incapacitation ideology. Anti-death penalty opponents have several arguments against the death penalty. The argument includes that it does not deter crime, it poses a risk of executing the innocent, it is cruel and uncivilized, and is a double standard for offenders and the government. For those who oppose capital punishment the ideology of rehabilitation by reconditioning the offender as a productive member of society is the goal.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe it is a great advantage because it can lower a great amount of people attempting murder. It intimidates future criminals from making crimes as well as performs revenge to the criminal and that shouldn 't be seen in a wrong way. There are many arguments against the death penalty, but they are usually not valid when looked deeply into the topic. It is important that all states come to an agreement and use death penalty rather than some states being legal and some not. The death penalty is useful in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I do not believe that Van Den Haag, in applying his philosophy, would commute the death sentence of Williams. The main reason for this is that he views the death penalty as the only punishment which is proportional to the crime of murder, in terms of retributive justice. Thus the only fitting punishment for the crimes of Williams would be execution. However, Van Den Haag also, in formulating his “best bet” theory, also states that the primary (though not the only) concern of punishment is deterrence, and that the number one argument for the death penalty is that it is our best bet for deterring crime. Given this, would Van Den Haag allow for partial clemency in recognition that Williams was seemingly reformed and doing good works?…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the death penalty deters murder and we did not use it, murders of innocent people will occur which could have been prevented. If the death penalty does not deter murder and we use it, executions of murderers will occur with out deterring. Preventable executions are preferable to preventable murders of innocent people. Of the two morally undesirable outcomes, we must pick one with the preferable results. Therefore, we should use the death penalty”.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because of its controversial nature, it is important to further analyze the moral permissibility of the death penalty. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation for those who commit crimes deemed by society and government as deserving the infliction of death. In this paper, I will defend the legalization of…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics