Examples Of Utilitarian Case For Capital Punishment

Superior Essays
A Utilitarian Case For Capital Punishment

On November 21, 1973, a man named Troy Leon Gregg murdered two men while hitchhiking in an attempted robbery in the mountains of Georgia. In the case Gregg v. Georgia, Gregg was sentenced to the electric chair by a Georgia Grand Jury and this decision was upheld by the US Supreme Court after many appeals. It was deemed that the death penalty does not violate the eighth amendment of the constitution that prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. Although Gregg escaped custody and was found dead one day prior to his execution, the decision reaffirmed the use of capital punishment in the United States. The death penalty has been the the most effective, yet controversial punishments when dealing with
…show more content…
There is a sense of closure given to the victim’s family because the convicted killer can never kill again. The death of a proven murderer may, in fact, create happiness for the general public along with the victim’s families. However, capital punishment should not be based upon lex talionis, an “eye for an eye” mentality. This is a retributive mentality and the punishment is created because the offender “deserves” the punishment. Retributive punishment focuses on revenge for the past rather than looking to improve the future. The utilitarian purpose of punishment is not revenge, but rather what creates the most happiness for society as a whole. Society gains little from revenge for a past crime but can gain happiness for the future if the crime never occurs again. After a crime is committed, it cannot be undone. It can, however, be dealt with so it never occurs again. The question is no longer should capital punishment be used, the question is now how capital punishment should be used. Does every murderer deserve the death penalty? In his 1868 opposition to a bill that would outlaw the death penalty, Mill gives a speech to Parliament encompassing the necessity of the capital …show more content…
Utilitarianism simply states that society should find what creates the most utility and apply that action. Philosophy is not performed in a vacuum and every crime has different circumstances that can lead to a different punishment which creates the most utility. Every consequence must be weighed if a certain punishment is applied and every case is unique. A utilitarian decision can be based upon past precedents and experiences, as done in the United States legal system. For example, society would not benefit from the execution of a mentally impaired man that was the cause for another’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alejandrina Carreno Mrs. Kemp Civics May 3, 2015 Gregg v. Georgia The case of Gregg v. Georgia involved the case of Troy Gregg versus the state of Georgia. The case was decided by the United States Supreme Court in July of 1976 in which involved the sentencing of the death penalty. Troy Leon Gregg, was arrested in 1973 due to armed robbery and murder convictions, it was believed that Gregg was involved in the robbery and murder of two men in Georgia.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Written Assignment #2 Stephen M. Diplan Intro to Corrections John Jay College of Criminal Justice Gregg v. Georgia decision legalized capital punishment in the USA. The law was adopted in connection to the crimes committed by Troy Leon Gregg - hence is the name. The trial was held in Georgia and the Georgian Supreme Court considered two options – either life-prison sentence or capital punishment (Legal Information Institute). The juries were presented with evidence and could not find any mitigating circumstances to the crime. On the contrary, the robbery with murder of two men was acknowledged to be a heavy breach of law and the criminal was sentenced to death.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is a branch of metaethics that focuses on the ideas of consequences, self interest, and unbiasedness. Instead of determining if an action is moral through the immediate effects, Utilitarianism skimps over the short term and instead focuses on the long term effects of actions. Actions are no longer based on intention but, rather the overall effects from those actions determines if the parent event was morally good or bad. Utilitarianism also emphasizes the idea that an individual’s well being trumps all moral responsibilities, if a person has to steal food to eat then by utilitarianist standards this person is being morally correct despite his obvious theft. This is advantage to the ideology as it allows for a greater sense of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As John Morrison exclaimed,“It should be clear that the death penalty does just the opposite of promoting decency and respect for life... It can never be applied fairly.” Since the mid nineteenth century, inmates on death row have been murdered by a plethora of gruesome methods, such as venomous lethal injections, gas chambers, and electrocution. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 1,413 executions in the United States from 1976 to the present. Although the number of death penalty verdicts are decreasing, flaws in the American judicial system have caused an increase in the amount of punishing wrongfully accused suspects to the death penalty.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, a man named Mark Klaas was interviewed about how he felt after the man who kidnapped and murdered his daughter, was executed. His response was that he was disappointed that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice had been fulfilled. Mark now knows that the man that killed his twelve year-old, will never cause harm to anyone else. But what if the court had decided that it was not a "heinous" murder? Closure is what the death penalty brings to many hurting families, which is why the death penalty should be allowed in any murder cases where someone was proven guilty.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Revenge Ever Justified

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not all revenge is justified some people misunduderstand and aren’t aware of the limits of revenge. These people commit crimes in order to avenge which is not right. Most murderers…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Revenge is not deterrence, it doesn’t have a virtuous meaning behind it due to the fact it is more emotionally driven with no intention of justice. Revenge starts a never ending cycle that makes the possibility of reality abstract the deeper it travels. If revenge does nothing but drive a person to such a state that they cannot function properly, then revenge is a waste of…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Revenge is almost always emotionally driven and produced by anger, outrage and vindictiveness, and while it is only natural to feel outraged and disgusted by such heinous and violent crimes, it is incredibly dangerous to allow such emotions to govern our legal response to crime as our emotions often blind us and lead to make decisions that have not been logically thought through. In contrast, justice, by definition, is intended to be the rational, objective and fair treatment of others. By this definition revenge cannot be synonymous with justice and it is clear there is a notable difference between the two. Revenge is an impulsive, emotionally driven and a damaging response to a wrong received. In order for there to be true justice, a punishment must be decided upon logically, unbiasedly, and unemotionally.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In cases where crimes such as assault, criminal homicide or battery is committed, the victim may have the desire to revenge leading to another crime in future. Therefore, if the defendant is punished accordingly, this punishment serves as a retribution because it the victim will no longer desire to revenge. Restitution Finally, punishment for a crime can be done for the purpose of restitution.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is where the action that maximizes utility is the best course to take. There are two different types of utilitarianism within the theory: act and rule. Act utilitarianism looks at a specific act from an individual and determines whether the best possible results occurred from that individual’s decision. If the best outcome occurred, the act is morally justifiable and therefore no crime committed. However, if other plausible decisions could have been made to maximize the results, then a crime may have been committed.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Revenge Wrong

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Raymond Lesniak, author of “The Death Penalty Breeds a Culture of Revenge” says, “The need for revenge leads to hate and violence. Redemption opens the door to healing and peace. Revenge slams it shut” (4). By seeking revenge an individual is strayed from the idea that redemption can lead to healing, over just having closure. Most people believe that revenge solves all their problems of pain and suffering, but in reality it might just make the situation worse.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The utilitarian theory of punishment fully supports disregarding the origins in sentencing the rioters. The theory specifically focuses on the future with respect to how punishing benefits society. Punishment is justified if society benefits more than the harm caused by punishing the criminal. There are four goals in utilitarian theory. These are specific deterrence, general deterrence, reform and incapacitation.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays