Difference Between Thomas Hobbes And Soft Determinism

Superior Essays
There seems to be an incompatibility between our belief in human autonomy and the principle of causality. Free will is the philosophical doctrine that denies determinism is true, that some of our choices are uncaused. Free will is the result of the absence of conditions, causes, and other necessary determinants of behaviour or choice. Neither mental nor physical events are determined by past events. Thomas Hobbes offered his account of freedom by suggesting that external impediments are not the reasons for an individual's action rather the free agents have the freedom to do what one wills. “A free agent is he that can do as he will, and forbear as he will, and that liberty is the absence of external impediments.” Hobbes statements offers …show more content…
Determinism, the opposite view to that of Libertarianism, argues that there cannot be any human freedom of choice or action. Therefore a determinist would agree that there is no free will. Determinism stems into two major philosophical theories of free will, Hard Determinism, and Compatibilism; Soft Determinism. Both Hard and Soft Determinism follows the Principle of Universal Causality, that is that every event in the world must be caused by some other event. If an action is caused by other events, then it is not free. Every event or state of affairs, including every human decision and action, is the inevitable and necessary consequence of both prior and preceding antecedent states of affairs and is based on the theory of Universal Causation. Isaac Newton stated the ‘All physical objects, living or dead, must conform to natural laws,’ hence to follow these natural laws physical objects must have a cause. This is the belief that everything in the universe, including all human action and choice, has a cause. Thus all events are causally determined and theoretically predicted. The prior truth about the world, that nothing happens for no sufficient reason is called Causality. Causality is the view that the world is a mechanism, that choices are already determined by previous conditions, no acts are avoidable. A Hard determinist follows this path, that everything is

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, Agnew cites three different types of determinism: soft, hard, and indeterminism. Hard determinism refers to no choice nor freedom while soft determinism deals with no…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Charles Arthur Campbell was a philosopher who defended the Libertarian view of free will. While he was a believer in free will, he also left room for determinism because he believed that determinism does not go against the correct view of free will. He believed that in order for an act to be free, the agent must be the sole author of the act. If one is subjected to the influence of past events or a set of events one’s action is not free because if other entities other than the agent had influence upon the given act then that act can no longer be deemed morally correlated to the agent. One must also have a real sense that one could have done otherwise in order to be compatible with the view that one event does not lead to another.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No action we choose to partake in is determined by us, but predetermined and forced due to…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A cause is an event that makes a later event happen and once that event happens it must take place due to the laws of nature. With the belief that determinism is true, then a sequence of events exist that extends back in time. For example, a man decides to steal from a bank. Some preceding event, call c, caused that man to steal.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compatibilism vs Hard Determinism Liaa Ferede University of Minnesota Rochester Introduction Hard determinism is the belief that “all of our actions are completely causally determined by prior events” (Mondy, Hard determinism ppt, 2017) therefore our actions are not free. For instance, the way someone grew up can affect how they view the world and how they make decisions, so their action is not free because it is affected by their past. I will be objecting to this view with the compatibilism view because even though our actions are based off our past, we still have free will depending on the circumstance. I will be describing some circumstances where we do and do not have free will.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holbach’s View on Free Will Paul Holbach was a French philosopher who is a hard determinist meaning that he believes determinism is true, and if determinism is true then you cannot have free will, therefore free will does not exist. In Paul Holbach 's “The Illusion of Free Will,” he argues that people don’t have any free will and that nature determines every human’s actions and will. Free will is the ability for one to perform an action without any outside force influencing them and to be able to be morally responsible for that action. Determinism is the belief where people’s actions and wills are caused by an external force rather their own will meaning no one can be held morally responsible for the outcome for that action. The dilemma of…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human behaviors, actions, desires and memories are all subjects that are discussed in everyday philosophy. Philosophy is defined as the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy has a lot to do with the future. When it comes to philosophy the future is already set and no one knows what will happen until the time comes and that is called hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that human behavior and actions are determined by external factors, and therefore humans do not have genuine free will or ethical accountability.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second form of determinism is soft determinism, also called “compatibilism”. Compatibilists are half determinists, half indeterminists. They believe that all events are results of causes. Thus, they agree with hard determinists on that.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hard Determinism Argument

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They believe that we are able to directly influence events that happen, and how they happen, directly choosing our future. That theory, however, is false because while we may be able to affect or influence certain events, we are not able to directly choose what happens to us. Therefore, because of the true inability to directly choose what happens to us, Hard Determinism is the best argument. Baron D’Holbach, author of “The System of Nature”, pieced together an argument that was able to draw the following conclusion1; “1) A human being is a material (i.e., a physical) thing.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thousands of years ago, philosophers began to argue about the existence of free will. Free will is a power of acting without restraint of fate. People started questioning whether free will exists or if it is merely imagined. Do humans have control over their actions, behaviors, choices, desires and emotions? Some philosophers believe that human have self-control over their actions, and others say that there is no such a thing as self-control.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, you turn on the faucet in your house to get a glass of water. The event of turning on the faucet was caused because you had a sudden desire to drink some water. A hard determinist would say that you had no choice and that you were always going to get that glass of water, a soft determinist would say that while an event had caused you to get the water you still freely chose to get up and fill your glass with water. One of the main arguments against soft determinism is that it is an inherently flawed argument because soft determinists change the definition of free will to make it compatible with determinism. In Cahn’s “Freedom or Determinism” he discusses how the definition of free will differs between a soft determinist and a hard determinist.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays