Exploiting D Holbach's Arguments

Improved Essays
The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan

Are we free?
- Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments -

P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions? These questions can be taken philosophically and psychologically, but in this essay, we will focus only on the philosophical approach with an aim to gain profound understanding and careful analysis of this critical question. One way to simplify the question is by assuming that there is a person “X” who did certain action in certain circumstances in certain time, so
…show more content…
If a Muslim person did not follow these strict rules, he/she will deserve the extreme punishment in the other life that he/she as a Muslim believes in. This leads us to conclude that Islam is based on personal freedom or at least part of it. In Islam, I am the one who determine my fate to heaven or to hell. Thus, I am the only one who takes the responsibility of my actions. D’Holbach this free will is just an illusion. For d’Holbach, there is no free will. He defines will as a modification of the brain, and it is the result of the impulse that he receives from a motive, an object, or an idea. Hence, these internals are the causes to make the choice a person is making, so humans are never free. And a response by d’Holbach to indeterminists who believe in free will, he proposed an example of a thirsty dog to explain that our actions are always resulting from the causes we are encountering. These causes are navigating us even we think the opposite. The second form of determinism is soft determinism, also called “compatibilism”. Compatibilists are half determinists, half indeterminists. They believe that all events are results of causes. Thus, they agree with hard determinists on that.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Holbach’s View on Free Will Paul Holbach was a French philosopher who is a hard determinist meaning that he believes determinism is true, and if determinism is true then you cannot have free will, therefore free will does not exist. In Paul Holbach 's “The Illusion of Free Will,” he argues that people don’t have any free will and that nature determines every human’s actions and will. Free will is the ability for one to perform an action without any outside force influencing them and to be able to be morally responsible for that action. Determinism is the belief where people’s actions and wills are caused by an external force rather their own will meaning no one can be held morally responsible for the outcome for that action. The dilemma of…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A philosopher named A.J. Ayer would interpret Holbach's ideas. He believes that free will is compatible with determinism. He interprets Holbach's understanding of causal law, he argues that the laws of nature does not guarantee that something will happen a hundred percent. He wants to believe that human beings can be held responsible for their actions, if determinism is true. So he interprets determinism in a different way than Holbach, by simplifying the subject in his own words.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare once mentioned that “It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves” (“William Shakespeare Quotes”). He explains that fate does not control our actions but our own will is what takes jurisdiction of it. Essentially, one’s mental thoughts are what drives one’s behavior. The human psyche is composed of the id, ego, and superego. These three aspects of the human psyche are what controls our actions and determines our personality.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Of the System of Man’s Free Agency” D’Holbach explains his argument that human action is determined by the laws of nature. He proposes that humans are part of the natural world and therefore governed by necessary laws, so they have no free will. On this essay I will argue that D’Holbach’s argument on motive is not a good one; I will explain the argument, present why do I think the argument fails and consider ways to defend the argument from my own attack. D’Holbach’s Argument D’Holbach concedes that “To be undeceived on the system of his free agency, man has simply to recur to the motive by which his will is determined; he will always find this motive is out of his own control. It is said: that in consequence of an idea to which the mind gives birth, man acts freely if he encounters no obstacle”.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cabrillo College Nickolas Kalafut Introduction to Philosophy - Philo. 4 Fall 2017 Case Study #2: Free Will and the Opioid Crisis Paraphrase: The Guardian article “Don't blame addicts for America's opioid crisis. Here are the real culprits” provides the argument that the opioid crisis was caused by big pharma companies, politicians, and regulators who all recklessly approved pills. The article argues this epidemic is caused the US health industry being run for profit; the system gives power to the…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If determinism is true, then it is impossible for a person to have free will because a person that could not act otherwise than he did does not act freely. This view is also known as incompatibilism. However, according to a soft determinist, one who believes that humans are determined and still free, the first mistake about the argument of incompatibilism is that freedom and determinism oppose each other. Soft determinists believe that determinism conflicts with freedom because of the misconception of freedom.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Sider, determinism is the belief that every event is caused by a previous event. For example, when a ball rolls on the ground, we assume that some force (perhaps a child) caused it to start rolling. Determinism claims that all events are like the rolling ball; that is, all events are caused by previous events. Free will is much more difficult to define.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Soft determinism was coined by philosopher William James. Soft determinist believe that human freedom and determinism are compatible positions. Soft determinist are also known as compatibilists who believe in combatilism. They feel that the determinism argument is true, but they refuse to give up on the idea of human freedom and responsibility. The problem soft determinists face is the idea that life and our actions can be both predetermined to an extent but also be factored by freewill and…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every action taken, every thought, and every belief a person has results from their mental identity and a series of choices they have made. The presence of free will in society is a stubborn one despite scientific findings people cannot let go of the idea that they control their own destiny. Free will is the inspiration for…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    First of all “freedom” and “security” are both vague concepts that are both equally important and therefore there is a trade off between them. They are both interconnected and neglecting one in the pursuit of the other can cause a problem in that society. This essay aims to highlight both the advantages and disadvantages of freedom and security at an individual and societal level. It will also incorporate use of significant examples in different countries relating to these concepts focusing on the Uk and America. Finally it will introduce the concepts of Liberalism and totalitarianism and how they apply to freedom and security.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the question always remains the same. Do we actually have free will? And how can we be certain that we are fully exercising it? For centuries, many Philosophers have argued, whether Free Will exist and as human…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays