Coercive diplomacy is a threat diplomacy whereby one of the actors threatens the other with repercussions, whether of a military, economic or social nature. This diplomatic tactic involves using the threat of the war in Europe or launching a nuclear attack in exchange for ceding the requirements of the other state.
This diplomacy is therefore an instrument of prevention and management of conflicts before the conduct of a State that, otherwise, could end up causing a warlike confrontation in every rule. The purpose of armed actions is to intimidate and influence rival political decision-makers, not to destroy their military force. However, in some cases the level of force used can reach levels that make it difficult to draw a clear dividing …show more content…
The higher the level of violence, the process will have less coercive diplomacy and more open armed conflict. But the final options are not reduced to a triumph or an absolute fiasco. Throughout the process, the actors can modify their respective demands, reaching intermediate agreements that avoid a confrontation, and that satisfy to a greater or lesser extent the parties involved. In the case of DPRK, attempts at diplomacy are still happening and it is yet unsure how it will turn out in the end, because of DPRK’s very sensitive case.
The North Korean diplomacy line was the result of the conflict between communism and capitalism during the Cold War, which established the diplomatic policy of the …show more content…
In this regard, the new US president, Donald Trump, and the interim president of South Korea, Hwang Kyo-Ahn, committed last January to "strengthen" their joint defense capacity. As stated in an article made by the US department of state: “The decision of President Donald Trump and President Moon Jae-in to regularize the Expanded Deterrence Strategy and Consultation Group (EDSCG), the foreign affairs and defense agencies of both countries have approved a new framework for the group and have committed to an EDSCG meeting in the near future.” This means how the both allied countries are committed to deter North
This diplomacy is therefore an instrument of prevention and management of conflicts before the conduct of a State that, otherwise, could end up causing a warlike confrontation in every rule. The purpose of armed actions is to intimidate and influence rival political decision-makers, not to destroy their military force. However, in some cases the level of force used can reach levels that make it difficult to draw a clear dividing …show more content…
The higher the level of violence, the process will have less coercive diplomacy and more open armed conflict. But the final options are not reduced to a triumph or an absolute fiasco. Throughout the process, the actors can modify their respective demands, reaching intermediate agreements that avoid a confrontation, and that satisfy to a greater or lesser extent the parties involved. In the case of DPRK, attempts at diplomacy are still happening and it is yet unsure how it will turn out in the end, because of DPRK’s very sensitive case.
The North Korean diplomacy line was the result of the conflict between communism and capitalism during the Cold War, which established the diplomatic policy of the …show more content…
In this regard, the new US president, Donald Trump, and the interim president of South Korea, Hwang Kyo-Ahn, committed last January to "strengthen" their joint defense capacity. As stated in an article made by the US department of state: “The decision of President Donald Trump and President Moon Jae-in to regularize the Expanded Deterrence Strategy and Consultation Group (EDSCG), the foreign affairs and defense agencies of both countries have approved a new framework for the group and have committed to an EDSCG meeting in the near future.” This means how the both allied countries are committed to deter North