Dictator's Ethical Behavior

The President of United Nation of South America (UNSA), as the leader of the free world, should take a serious consideration for what his challenging task to end the slavery and oppressive society that have taken the innocent citizenry’ liberal and freedom rights away of United States. His taking action is an empathic and sentimental concern for what Americans have to face the totalitarian dictatorship of President for decades. He decides to take an action in his ethical behavior opposes the tyrannical dictator’ ethical practices and decisions. When the dictatorial President of United States decides to ban the liberty and freedom rights of citizenry’ lives, they face to lose the concepts of liberty and freedom footnotes in many banned books, and they are forced into a slavery system that is unacceptable to UNSA President. The concept of a slavery system is unethical behavior in …show more content…
He encourages every citizen values its liberty rights to promote themselves as worth and rightfully independents from the cycles of slavery, oppression, and control. The inner-direction liberation is the importance emphasis in the liberal and freedom values that will help every citizen toward to their self-realization with their efforts (Cohen & Ben-Yehuda, 1987, p.378). That is why he decides to follow his “inner-direction” liberation to save Americans if he put his efforts into a commitment and determination along with his supportive and trust team members to make it happen. He has to find a mass of workers who are willing to participate in the party to support his ideal resolution against the United States (Friedrich & Brzenzinski, 1965). In contrast, the United States President allows its people to face the brutal and torture treatments which is unethical in the democratic governance