Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion Summary

Improved Essays
In part X of the “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,” starts of Demea arguing that, religious belief shapes state of humanity and universal for a better world, but Philo argues that there’s no reasons to believe in God from religious belief. Philo mentions that everyone who sense in religion for god are men who are morally wrong for believing an imagery person who has great power. Demea states that miseries of life from an unhappy men to enjoyments of life, like riches and honors have been true to godly living. That god is responsible for bringing enjoyments of life to misery life. Philo’s points out that those who dedicated themselves to a religious purpose to misery of humanity are pathetic preacher that sorrow to inspire. Philo also …show more content…
If so, Deity is showing a wish to do evil to men and animals. Cleanthes smiles and surprised that Philo came to an agreement to Demea but thinks that Philo’s question should still be answered about Deity powers to prevent evil. If a point is proven that mankind is to be evil and unhappy then, religion and Deity has nothing to do with it. Demea is concerned that man with wickedness and misery are to believe that God does not exist and profaneness. Demea wants humanity to see the general laws with love and kindly to think of the Deity through all the hard times with providences. Cleanthes disagree with Demea arbitrary because it can never be proven and her statements are too exaggerated. The only way Cleanthes can agree with Demea is for him to embrace the divine benevolent. Finally, Philo comes to an agreement that there is no view of the condition of a human life without any sort of evil being involved. Humanity can only conclude the moral attributes and learn from infinite benevolence, power, and wisdom. This concludes that if one gives a reasonable answer about human’s lack of knowledge of Gods purpose and creation, then this makes them believing in God. Philo uses his lack of knowledge as a basis for proving Gods

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In “Reasonable Religious Disagreements,” Richard Feldman posits that two reasonable peers cannot come to a reasonable disagreement. The premise of a “reasonable disagreement” has various conditions, in short being that the peers must be epistemic, and they must have shared all of their evidence pertaining to the argument. By this criteria, it is not plausible for two epistemic peers with access to the same body of evidence to ever reach reasonably different conclusions. However, a problem arises with the previously stated criteria when examining the point regarding full disclosure of evidence. When examining Feldman’s article from this perspective, it is possible that it may not be considered fully viable.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Olmec Religion Report By Uyen Pham Who, why, and how did the Olmec worship? The Olmec were rich in religion, all ceremonial or activity in the religion were done by shamans, people who were believed to have supernatural powers to spirits. Priests and rulers also participated in ceremonial activities, but rulers were the most influential to others because they were thought to be relatives of the gods in Olmec religion.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evolutionary theory of religion Evolutionary theories of religion supposed as posing a challenge to religious belief (Sosis & Kiper, 2013). Previous research explained religion as a naturalistic perspective, without call up the actual existence of supernatural agents or events (Bering, Cronk, Gray, Johnson, McCullough, Richerson & Sosis, 2007). According to Smith & Arrow (2010), evolutionists have created three theoretical camps that view religion as nonfunctional, functional, or dysfunctional. Nonfunctional theorists concluded that religion is not an adaptation but as an alternative to an evolutionary result of nonreligious adaptations (Smith & Arrow, 2010).…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the website, www.merriam-webster.com, medicine is seen today as “a substance that is used in treating disease or relieving pain and that is usually in the form of a pill or a liquid.” However, the Native Americans understood medicine to be greater than a medicinal tablet. Through the virtual exhibit, Native Voices: Native Concepts of Health and Illness Exhibit, and the text, Shamanism and the World of Spirits: The Oldest Religion, one can understand the Native American’s perspective of medicine through balance, ceremonies, different types of healers, what the healers used to heal, and healing plants. Balance is a crucial aspect to understanding traditional medicine. The text states that “reflected in many tribal healing systems…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In part X in “The Dialogue Concerning Natural Religion”, Demea has been trying to explain his ontological argument to Cleanthes and Philo. They believe that Demea’s argument is pathetic. This is because Demea believes that the human existence is so pathetic, we simply have to believe in the existence of God. We have to believe, feel, and experience God’s presence to make our lives more tolerable or good willing. Demea explains our lives are always falling to the faith with religion.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Understanding Religion AS90826: Analyse the response of a religious tradition to a contemporary ethical issue Credits: 6 Hina Patel What has been the response of Catholicism to the issue of abortion? 1. Explain in detail a contemporary ethical issue, and break it down into essential features Abortion “is the medical process of ending a pregnancy so it does not result in the birth of a baby.”…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Clarke set out to refute Thomas Hobbes in his second set of Boyle Lectures: A discourse Concerning the Unalterable Obligations of Natural Religion, to do so Clarke stated in it that there are different relations among people. Which he goes on to explain that from these relations arise “Fitness” and “unfitness” in behavior among people. To explain this, we must look at the relationship between man and god. The relationship between man and god is infinitely disproportional, there for as people we praise god, by worshipping, praising, and attempt to imitate him in our lives.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first, known as Divine Subjectivism, is the belief that something is good because God like it. The second, known as Divine Objectivism, is the belief that God likes things because they are good. Both of these two views come with their own set of criticisms, concerns, and inconsistencies. Because of this, Euthyphro’s Dilemma has been debated for thousands of years. In this paper, I will come to a conclusion…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Diversity In Religion

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Most people are their religion as a safe haven, a place to turn to when the woes of the world seem very dire and extreme. But, what happens when the places where religions are practice—generally called churches—are plagued with the same issues that are prevalent in every other aspect of society? The issues of racism and managed diversity are no strangers to religious interactions. In the article “Managed Diversity; Race, Place, and an Urban Church”, these concepts are examined in relation to religious interactions. The author, Jessica M. Baron, a theologist and sociologist delved into inner-city churches over the span of 18 months to study the manifestation of racism and managed diversity in church communities.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my life so far I’ve been exposed to various religions. My encounters have granted me the privilege to learn and understand each religion independently. What puzzled me the most was coming across a religion that wasn’t identified as a “religion” by a believer. In this chapter of Religion Pluralism, I wish to challenge those who are Christians to first take a step back and reanalyze the definition of religion. In order to obtain a more concise and understanding of religions and their values, I believe that redefining religion in itself would be necessary.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis Paper # 3 Analysis of “Religion Gives Meaning to Life,” by Louis P. Pojman Introduction: In this article, “Religion Gives Meaning to Life,” Louis P. Pojman believes that religion, but mainly a theistic religion gives purpose and meaning to life. Pojman feels that, since people cannot prove that theism is true or not true, then therefore, people should live like theism is true. A world with theism, living life following a higher being would be a better world than living a life of self-governing, autonomy. Lastly, Pojman believes that living in autonomy is not really affected by having a religion or faith but instead religion may help everyone’s autonomy because they will have more purpose for their personal goals.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that in Dialogue on Good, Evil, and The Existence of God by John Perry, the dialogue does not disprove the idea of God. This book focuses on three main characters: Gretchen Weirob, Sam Miller, and Dave Cohen and their debates about the existence of God. This drawn-out discussion begins when Miller visits his flu-ridden friend Weirob and asks to pray for her. Weirob immediately declines and this sparks a three-day long conversation, where Cohen joins in later, on who God is, the reason for evils in the world, the concept of freewill, and the possibility of devils. One of the first points discussed by Weirob and Miller is what foundation of God they were going to build off.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The discussion of the relationship between religion and ecology has sparked a huge debate across the world. Does ecology fall under the bubble of religion? Throughout this course we have been learning how hard it is to define religion and how diverse religion is. With many different types of religion and interpretations of God, it becomes difficult to find a common ground in the debate of religion and ecology. This essay will examine how religion and ecology correlate with one another as well as to produce a better understanding of how to approach the topic.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Worldview: Personal Portfolio Philosophy and Religion: Before Humanities 210, how would you have described the philosophies that influenced your processes for decision making, thinking, and developing preferences? How would you have described your level of conscious choice of and commitment to these philosophies? What helped form or develop the belief in that philosophy? After class discussions, have you had any realizations or made any changes in regards to the philosophies that influences your decisions, actions, or preferences?…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why do groups of people need a religious system in order to form stable cultures and societies? In his address before the Farmington Trust, philosopher Edward Goldsmith argues the importance of religion as a control mechanism for a stable society. He discusses a philosophy in which, “(Religion) provides a goal, whose achievement must ensure the society’s stable relationship with its environment, and a means of achieving this goal, i.e. a ‘hierarchical organisation of instructions or guidelines.’” (Goldsmith) In order to illustrate this organization, provided for by religion, and vital to a stable society, aspects of Ancient Greek culture are highlighted.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays