Defeating Jihad The Winnable War Analysis

Decent Essays
Amena Mamoon
Professor Mathews
Western Civilization
November 6, 2017

The novel “Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War” by Sebastian Gorka, is a novel that explains how the war on terror “is eminently winnable if we remove our ideological blinders, accurately name our enemy, and draw up a strategy to defeat the ideas that inspire terrorism.” (Gorka) I found this book to be slightly racist. As a Muslim, I understand what Jihad really means. Yes, it translates to holy war, however in the holy book of Islam the Quran, the holy war is not a real physical war. It is a spiritual war one faces every day of their life avoiding sins and doing wrongful things. It is a war to do good even when you feel like doing something wrong. For example, if a person
…show more content…
He explains how the public lacks knowledge of what the war is truly about, but most importantly who the enemy really is. He explains that the importance of clarifying who the enemy is so important because it allows for proper action to be taken. We are also told by the author that the reason for such public misunderstanding of the war and who the enemy is, is because of our last two presidential administrations of Bush and Obama. Gorka explains how these two presidents named the “jihadi” movement to be a movement with an intent to destroy the West—“violent extremism.” (Gorka). Even though Bush and Obama’s attempt was to maintain peace with the Muslim community, they failed to identify who the enemy is and this failure trickled to the people of the country because it allowed for the misinterpreting of the Islamic …show more content…
This statement is very true because if we were to ask a citizen of the United States before 9/11 if they knew about Islam at all compared to the citizens nowadays, we would get very less information. It is true that many citizens know more about Islam, however, still lack the understanding of it because of misguidance.
In Chapter three, “Annus horribilis,” the Iranian revolution is talked about with the siege of Mecca. The fourth chapter of the book is very interesting. In “The Enemy Masterminds: The Grand Strategists of Modern Jihad,” the author goes over many modern Islamist theorists like Sayyid Qutb, Ayman al Zawahiri, and General S.K. Malik. In this chapter, he uses many historical facts and reviews many important people.
The final chapter such as “What is to be Done?” and “Afterward,” talk about policy recommendations. “The individual American is encouraged to procure and to carry a firearm, and to report any suspicious activity to the police” (Gorka pgs

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    the article talks and demand a study to find out the main reason behind horrific terrorism attacks (9/11). This article is more persuasive than the former, because it provides some evidence and information to support the thesis. For example, "Why Al-qa 'idah needed to do this as no wise human brothers including Muslims and hurts anyone without any reason". (Afghan paper calls on USA to define what terrorism is, 2007, paragraph 3). there has to be a super power behind, who is funding terrorist and paying them under the table to commence such acts against entire world, "to achieve its strategic objectives ".…

    • 1272 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are a numerous like principals between the Just War Theory and the Al-Qaeda’ jihadist actions, such as the morality of their actions, just cause, right authority, and protections for the noncombatant individuals. This can be seen in the extreme, according Shari ‘a law, which is interpreted by Al-Qaeda and extremist Sunni Islamic scholars from the teachings of Mohammed in the Qur’an. According to the Islamic teachings, they should note the difference between the non-innocent and the innocent civilians among their enemies and use the lowest amount of force necessary. They further go on to say that if it is important to fight, it is also important to win. If it is necessary to bend or even break the rules of war to win, then they are excused in doing so.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mohammed claims there is language behind any war. When he said the language of war is killing, he is trying to say there is always a victim. He is not considering himself as a hero, but he considers himself as the American enemy. He argues that Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist. Mohammed considers Osama as a freedom fighter like Georg Washington.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern Islam there is only a small percent of about 2 percent of Muslims that participate in Jihad by the sword. These are the extremists. Muslim extremest believe that as a community Islam is under attack and therefore must fight back and spread their faith. People such as Osama Bin Laden who fight as individuals also believe that Islam has experienced injustice, oppression, and aggression. This is what drives them their quest to fight back.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Nathan and Donald agree that the appropriate response was exactly what President George W. Bush did. Dale strongly opposed the attacks on Iraq and stated “We did not belong there”. His opposition is based on his theory that the September 11 attacks were actually a “Cover-up”. I tend to agree with Nathan and Donald on their views that we responded appropriately and effectively to the terrorist attacks on our soil. Dale further went on to say “…if the government wanted more control over the people, including gun control, they have done both”.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the author the mentions the benefits of war on terror, he always counter act the benefits of the war on terror. For instance, he bring up the Patriot Act, which was supposed to protect Americans, to express the negativity of wiretapping and reduction of resections of the government. He brings up the death of Osama Bin Laden, not to show that justice have been swerve but that one phase of the war on terror was over and leading up to another phase of war with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. This tactic of relaying information leads the reader to believe that the author was bias against the…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Daesh: Terrorist Group

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many Muslims have initiated jihad.It is known in a promotional video that ISIS created that they believe that the flag of Isis honor them to commit Jihad answering a call to obey the Lord Allah. They believe, unlike other countries, they are the soldiers who stomp down nationalism .They feel honored to commit Jihad under the Lord 's command because of the authority of a supreme being and their hatred for nationalism. This would make ISIS members obliged to kill. Part of their ethnic background relates to how credible ISIS’s claims are. Khilafa,Established in 1345 is built on prophetic methodology, unlike secular states who supposedly fight for the wrong things.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Meaning Of Jihad

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The words and its meanings have been twisted and misinterpreted by Muslim scholars stating it as a law that refers to struggle against all those who do not believe in the Islamic god often referred as Allah and do not acknowledge the importance of Muslims. There have been a lot of debates of over what people believe the meaning of Jihad is. In this debate of stating which definition of Jihad is correct, the very true meaning of Jihad has been lost. The true meaning as the Quran states, Jihad is a practice of eliminating evils or evil practices of Islam and educating people about Islam. Today this has changed to believing that Jihad has a military meaning.…

    • 2259 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation has provided an optional training seminar on the potential dangers of Muslim people and has told their agents to conduct “surveillance operations broadly targeting the Muslim-American community, from infiltrating mosques with agents provocateur to racial – and ethnic-mapping programs” (Ackerman). Such activities by American government officials can be detrimental in their effects on the American population. A view that many Muslim Americans hold is that their freedoms are not the same as other non-Muslim Americans. Furthermore, their “Constitutionally protected religious faith of millions of Americans is portrayed as an indicator of terrorist activity” (Ackerman). Rather than looking for any “nefarious” activity or potential threats against America, people start to fear “Islam-as-Islam” (Ackerman).…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defeating Communism

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unfortunately, the United States indirectly caused the rise in Islamic terrorism by siding with the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan and by continuously fighting the secular Saddam Hussein in the 1990’s. Once Arab nationalism lost its appeal, the new way to be “free from the West” became Islamic fundamentalism. While the real national interest of American security remained unchanged throughout the Cold War and into the 1990’s, American policy makers learned the dangers of focusing on only one enemy. Focusing all efforts against Communism allowed for the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, the new enemy of the United…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays