Crime Defense Research Paper

Improved Essays
There are many defenses that can be taken by a victim. There are nine defenses that can be taken. The defense you take depends on the crime that was committed and your role in the incident.
The first defense is infancy. In this defense, you, as the criminal, are too young to be at fault for the crime. The charges will be excuses due to the age of the child. However, if the child is over the age of 8, and the crime is serious enough, they will be sent to a juvenile detention center. The child brain at this age is unable to cope with what is right or wrong, making the child be excused from charges.
Many people have mental illnesses that are not shown until they act out criminally. Insanity is a common defense. Mental illnesses can range widely
…show more content…
This is called duress. In this defense, if the threat is harming your life, you have the right to act back to an extent. You are able to act back with less force than what is threatened against you. Keeping in mind that the threat must be life threatening.
Self-defense is the act of defending oneself against a harmful person or situation. Without using deadly force, you are able to do whatever, within reason, to protect oneself or property. One can only defend him or her self until they are able to remove themselves from the situation.
In the necessity defense, the court looks at what happened compared to what may have happened. These acts occur because one feels obligated to correct their act, while only making the situation worse.
The final defense is entrapment. This defense happens when a crime is committed that would not usually be committed due to the submission of a law enforcement officer.
I believe that the father/judge in this video could use the defense of mistake. He could argue that he was upset with his daughter for using the Internet without his permission and he took his anger out on her. He could use the excuse that he went overboard because he does not believe in the use of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Us Vs Pachon Case Summary

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed that Pachon swallowed cocaine and transport to the United States, and that if he mentioned the proposition to anyone he would get in trouble. A week later Pachon told Jorge he would not be transporting the drugs. Jorge replied to Pachon by mentioned important and personal…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Issue: Did Abner commit assault and battery1? Rule: Assault is a physical act of a threating nature or an offer of corporal injury which puts an individual in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm. Battery is the intentional infliction of harm or offensive contact. Analysis: Did Abner commit assault?…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Wallentine, 2007) Lastly, when officers feel threatened by the number of suspects or outnumbered by large crowds, for example, the recent protest in Ferguson, Missouri and across the country, the officers may feel compelled to use force but in most of the cases across the country, it has not been necessary. Castle Doctrine v. Stand Your Ground Law The castle doctrine provides protection against intruders for the homeowners. For example, if your house is broken into, the law provides protection for the homeowner to use reasonable force, including deadly force to defend his or her property, person or another. The Stand Your Ground Law allows an individual to use force in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of a threat without an obligation to retreat first if the individual (1) has a legal right to be at the location and (2) is not engaged in an unlawful activity.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veyas Animal Cruelty

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm. — A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another response is resistance. This generally builds upon the feeling of anger at being victimized (Dunn 73). This response includes stating boundaries, not letting the defendant into your home, threatening to call the police, fighting or struggling, hanging up the phone, arguing with the defendant, or yelling and swearing at the defendant (Dunn…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “People tend to complicate their own lives, as if living weren 't already complicated enough.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón. Stand your ground law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place they have a lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. The Stand Your Ground Law was passed in 2006 for the first time in Georgia. Although some may believe that the “Stand Your Ground” law protects American citizens from any potential threats, people may take unfair advantages of the law;therefore, the current “Stand Your Ground” law should be abolished.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    oluntary Manslaughter: Voluntary manslaughter is the conviction given if a defendant who would otherwise have been found guilty of murder, successfully pleads one of two specific defences. These two defences are provocation, and diminished responsibility, and are both laid out in the Homicide Act 1957. The defence of provocation was a common law defence before the Homicide Act was created and brought into power. It is currently detailed in section three of this act, and is a two-part test.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can Murder be Considered Ethical Most movies involving conflict between good and evil often include murder. In most cases murder is considered one of the worst acts a person can commit; however, many of society’s favorite heroes and popular figures commit murder themselves. So what justifies a murder? Why are some people congratulated for their actions instead while others are condemned?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The defendant’s conduct must “cause” the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence, that is, it must result in an assault. The factual and legal tests must be applied: but for the defendant’s conduct the victim would not have been assaulted, and there are no factors preventing legal causation from being established. Factors affecting legal causation do not usually arise in questions on…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Stand Your Ground Law hundreds of criminals walk away from murder with no sentencing or punishment. Due to its many flaws a murder can walk free. Abused by most people, the law allows for someone to kill in cold blood and simply plead self-defense. The Stand Your Ground Law could have been beneficial in many cases but the constant use of abuse to avoid incarceration is appalling. A law intended to protect our rights and property was written so poorly that it could be twisted in the hands of our corrupt judicial system.…

    • 2467 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deadly Force Defense

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The deadly-force defense in a self-defense claim used to justify that a reasonable amount of force is necessary against another individual when that threat is deadly or may cause serious bodily harm often found in assault, battery, and homicide cases. Lisa M. Strom, 120, (2012). In other words, deadly force is a legal action taken that could potentially kill the other person who unlawfully enters a home, attempted murder, or felony action against oneself or another. Nonetheless, there are four elements in order to use self-defense related to the circumstances by proving the attack was unprovoked, injury or death was imminent, the amount of force was reasonable, and it is reasonably objective for the individual to fear for their life or serious…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is done by one person putting enough fear into a person where one person’s life is put in danger so they surrender their will. However fear can also be used to justify self defense according to Hobbes. “ For not ever Fear justifies the Action but the fear onely of corpoerall hurt, which we call Bodily Fear, and from which a man cannot see how to be delivered, but by the action. A man is assaulted , fear present death, from which he sees not how to escape, but by wounding that assauleth him; if he wound him to death, this is no crime; because no man is supposed at the making of a Common-wealth, to have abandoned the defense of his life, or limbes, where the Law cannot arrive on time enough to his assistance” (Hobbes 343). This simply means that once people are in a commonwealth they have the right to defend themselves if their life is being threatened and help cannot arrive in time.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, as the present case involves an intended use of defensive force to cause serious harm or death, the application of s 271(1) must be excluded. Section 271(2) of The Code outlines Self-defence against unprovoked assault where the force used results in death or grievous bodily harm. It…

    • 1530 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a major debate about when you can and cannot defend yourself . The article " Principles of the Just War " state that " self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause ." . This is a great point , an example of this is WW2 . The U.S. remained neutral , and the country was against going to war . After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th , 1941 the country had its reason , the next day December 8th , 1941 the U.S. entered the second world war .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction My argument is that the law of intention is clear, simple, and still fit for purpose. Intention is one of the categories falling under the mens rea of murder. The law uses intention as one of the main methods of classifying offences, such as deciding between murder or manslaughter. The presence or absence of intention is what the law is interested in, not the motive behind the actions in question.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays