Benefits Of Stand Your Ground Law

Improved Essays
Through the Stand Your Ground Law hundreds of criminals walk away from murder with no sentencing or punishment. Due to its many flaws a murder can walk free. Abused by most people, the law allows for someone to kill in cold blood and simply plead self-defense. The Stand Your Ground Law could have been beneficial in many cases but the constant use of abuse to avoid incarceration is appalling. A law intended to protect our rights and property was written so poorly that it could be twisted in the hands of our corrupt judicial system. The Stand Your Ground Law is the principle that a person may exert brutal force against someone if they truly believe that they are keeping themselves or someone else out of harm’s way. A person can also defend themselves …show more content…
The defendant would have to be able to prove that committed the crime within the stature of the law. In these situations, the goal is avoiding legal actions by claiming that the other person brought it upon themselves. Basically, the defendant must prove to the jury that he acted to save his life. Under this if the person can prove they acted in self-defense the defendant would not need to see the inside of a court room. The Stand Your Ground law can be beneficial in many cases such as rape and home invasions. If a woman is put in a situation where she must exert brutal force against a perpetrator to save her life the Stand Your Ground law will protect her. Also in the instances of a home invasion the stand your ground law could protect a family from a robber. The law is beneficial in many cases but for a law so poorly written it is constantly …show more content…
Rachel Barezinsky and four of her friends trespassed into Mr. Davis’s yard in the means just to conduct a childish prank. The girls were just investigating the mystery that lurked around the neighborhood. Children would walk by and whisper to one another about witches living in the home, since it was kept in such harsh conditions. As the five teen girls were leaving the yard Mr. Davis came out and shot Rachel Barezinsky in the back of her head. According to the article, "Stand Your Ground" Laws Are a License to Murder, “Police said the girls were nowhere near the house—they were, in fact, driving away—when Davis opened fire with his .22-caliber rifle.” The girls had already left the property and in no way harmed or threatened Davis’s life. In regard, to the incident all Davis’s could say was "I regret that (Barezinsky was shot), however, I would ask, why was that teenage girl engaging in delinquent behavior?" Through the Stand Your Ground law and the NRA’s License to Kill law Davis was charged with assault and then soon after the charges were dropped. The charges were dropped because based on the Stand Your Ground law if a person is to trespass onto your property you no longer have a duty to retreat. Also, through the License to Kill law, if there is a perceived threat you are then able to shoot your fire arm in a means of self-defense. The girls were no longer on

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The United States Constitution’s 11th amendment also states that an officer must show that they had probable cause in order to have lawsuits brought against them dismissed. In situations involving police use of excessive force the 11th amendment; protections have had multiple successes due to death caused by a police officer. A majority of cases heard regarding probable cause often lead to a dismissal of charges, but the penalty is usually in monetary form as an end result of a lawsuit. The 11th amendment granted diversity jurisdiction to the federal courts, allowed lawsuits between a State and Citizens of another State called, Sovereign Immunity. The law is ethical and morally correct, but not successful in assuring police are charged…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the United States, the criminal justice system follows two unique diverse models that protect the people. One of these models is the Due Process Model and in this model, the rights of the defendant are equally and fairly treated. Which this process being the main objective of this clause. The second model is the Crime Control Model and in this model strict punishments to the defendant committing the crime be forced but also protecting the individual 's rights as well. Both these models have a different method in which they protect the individuals but have a similar focus.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground Summary

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Samir Jhajj Mrs. Michielin ENG 1D0-H October 15, 2014. Independent Study Unit Task One: Eric Roberts Walters was born on March 3, 1957 in Toronto, Ontario. Eric studied at York University and when he was finished from university, he started to teach at a public school in Streetsville, Ontario in 1993. His class were not good readers or writers, but the way Mr. Walters made them better was by writing his first book called Stand Your Ground. After writing this book, Mr. Walters’ class enjoyed reading this book and so did the community.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Article 3 of the Universal declaration of Human rights states “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” Although he was acting inappropriately I believe she used unnecessary force when she should’ve removed herself from the situation. As he wasn’t physically violent or harassing, I believe that she reacted violently and…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    of the young hippie movement, a growing number of young people who rejected authority and embraced the drug culture (History.com, 2010). In response to police using physical force in a civil protest, the courts Fourth Amendment doctrine regulating police violence, including its recent decision in Scott v. Harris, is unprincipled and indeterminate. The common law of justification defenses, by contrast, gives a well-established legal structure for figuring out when a person may justly use force against another. I believe that police use of force can be constitutionally justified only if they are in pursuit of legitimate states interests. In particular, police use of force is justified only if they assist the mechanisms of criminal justice (e.g.,…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The stop and frisk policy is this idea that police officers can stop, question, and pat someone down on the street if there is reasonable suspicion or probable cause that they are committing, have committed, or is in the process of committing a crime. In addition, police officers are able to stop and frisk an individual if they are concerned with the safety of themselves or others. This practice exists as a way to what is supposed to reduce crime rates and help keep communities safe. However, the stop and frisk policy does not help prevent harm from occurring in communities.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand your ground is now in twenty states allowing people to use their gun in public. The law offers legal cover to people who feel justified in using deadly force in self-defense (DeBRABANDER). Anyone who owns a gun can now take it with them to public, and they can use it if they feel threatened. A very popular case which used this law was the Zimmerman case. Zimmerman shot and killed a black teenager named Trayvon Martin.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Stand Your Ground Law” Many African Americans are killed every day because the Stand Your Ground law allows any person to hurt a citizen they think is “suspicious” to them or their community. The person they see may not be doing any suspicious activity, but in their eyes, they are a criminal out to do more crimes. Trayvon Martin was thought to be a criminal because he had a hood on and was outside late at night. George Zimmerman used racial profiling to say that a young African American boy who was walking home was a criminal, and he killed him despite what the police told him to do.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The identification of several significant facts in the case of Tennessee v. Garner calls into question the use of deadly force in the “unattempted” apprehension of an unarmed suspect. The first such fact is the admission and later verification by Hymon that Garner was unarmed. A second fact is that the suspect was fleeing in the opposite direction (away) from Officer Hymon and in a position as not to cause the officer to be in fear for his life. Additionally, Officer Hymon with the aid of his flashlight was able to observe that the suspect was a minor and of slender statue (observing his hands and face) posing no threat to him or others.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deadly Force Defense

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The deadly-force defense in a self-defense claim used to justify that a reasonable amount of force is necessary against another individual when that threat is deadly or may cause serious bodily harm often found in assault, battery, and homicide cases. Lisa M. Strom, 120, (2012). In other words, deadly force is a legal action taken that could potentially kill the other person who unlawfully enters a home, attempted murder, or felony action against oneself or another. Nonetheless, there are four elements in order to use self-defense related to the circumstances by proving the attack was unprovoked, injury or death was imminent, the amount of force was reasonable, and it is reasonably objective for the individual to fear for their life or serious…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stand Your Ground Summary

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As Kelly Brown Douglas notes in her book Stand Your Ground, one of reasons for perpetuating slavery after the other Western European countries abolished it was due to America’s belief in Manifest Destiny. White Anglo-Saxons assumed they were called by God to rule the “New World”, but also to rule the Africans they had enslaved. In essence, God chose white people over all other races to be the ruling elites who dominate the world. They are the chosen people, in similar ways to Israel, who were God’s chosen people, determined to rule and colonize the “Promised Land”. Not only would Americans colonize, they would also proselytize and set an example of what pious morality ought to look like.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to this theory, the law does not require a battered woman’s fear to be correct but only reasonable in Ms. Lavallee case, with the help of expert evidence to be acceptable and relevant. Therefore in this case, the law pursues their own understandings of the good in Ms. Lavallee. With this said, this theory plays on the concept that if an individual feels if their life is in danger, self-defence is accurate. In this case of Lavallee many reasons were questioned including both reasonableness and ethics. However, from this utilitarianism theory, act utilitarianism focuses on individual happiness which the law makes calculation of good versus evil that relates to Ms. Lavallee (….pg. 140).…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Walker, Samuel. “Police Accountability and the Central Problem in American Criminal Justice.” Holding Police Accountable. Ed. Candace McCoy.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Advantages of Stop and Frisk Procedures Stop and frisk procedures are used in situations that present a potential threat to the officer or public. It serves as a key component to prohibit a threat from escalating and catching individuals who have, will, or are in the process of committing a crime. According to interviews with the New York Police Department, stop…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a major debate about when you can and cannot defend yourself . The article " Principles of the Just War " state that " self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause ." . This is a great point , an example of this is WW2 . The U.S. remained neutral , and the country was against going to war . After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th , 1941 the country had its reason , the next day December 8th , 1941 the U.S. entered the second world war .…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays