Court Appointed Interpreter Case Study

Court appointed interpreters use several different techniques in conveying messages from litigants (applicant or adverse) to the judge. These modes include consecutive, simultaneous, and summary interpreting (cite). Consecutive interpreting involves the rendering of statements after the speaker stops speaking. Simultaneous interpreting occurs whilst the speaker speaks. Lastly, summary interpreting is largely used to interpret witness testimony (cite). Because several different methods can be utilized in the courtroom, this can create additional challenges in the courtroom. For instance, paraphrasing or condensing a speaker’s statements can create a disconnect between what is said and what is relayed during the interpretation process. Therefore, interpretation styles can become potential barriers to accessing justice in the courtroom. The issuance of protective orders is dependent on several factors involving level of …show more content…
How effective are interpreters in assisting LEP/ESL clients in articulating concerns and understanding procedures in the courtroom?
Hypothesis: Because individuals are limited English proficient (LEP), having an interpreter present positively affects courtroom interaction, as individuals are able to understand courtroom procedures and articulate their concerns to the judges.

2. Does the use of an interpreter affect protective order outcomes in DV cases?
Hypothesis: The use of an interpreter increases the chances of an applicant receiving a protective order.

3. What are the potential limitations in accessing justice (successful protective order outcomes)?
Hypothesis: Language related issues (ability to read, comprehend, or communicate) and understanding courtroom procedures are potential limitations to LEP (ESL) persons accessing justice.

4. Are LEP/ESLs more likely to request an advocate in the courtroom than English proficient persons?
Hypothesis: LEP/ESLs are more likely to request an advocate in the courtroom than EP persons.