Analytic Ethical Practice: Corporate Behavior

Improved Essays
Analytic Ethical Practice-Corporate Behavior Ethical behavior varies between both hemispheres; whether its corporation or religious beliefs (Drucker, 1981). There are several concepts portray by corporation and individuals. Even though past predecessors and today’s leaders use the same language in business ethics but meanings differ. In the early 1980’s, one scholarly researcher Drucker (1981) visualize the variation of ethics. The research capitalizes on the theory of casuistry which encompass the importance of one’s action reflected on other individuals. This theory has a ripple effect that can affect generations of leaders.
Several researchers disagree with Drucker’s visualization on business ethics. Analyzing article Character Formation
…show more content…
Today, corporate still tailor the classic structure of social responsibility (Friedman, 1970). Social responsibility reported by Cohen (2009) facilitate as the new “in thing”. Depending on an individual origin, social responsibility approach can be interpreted multiple ways (Dahlsrud, 2008). The various meanings can cause confusion establish by Dahlsrud (2008) due to bias acquisition numerous channels. Instead of corporate social responsibility (CSR), Dahlsrud (2008) visualize as social construction (SC) because of infinite analogues.
In order to associate with the word social responsibility, individuals must understand the meaning. Social responsibility concept excludes employers’ interest, yet, it proven to increase the interest that works best for the organization (Friedman, 1970) due to the fact that stockholders are vulnerable to risk.
Distinguishing the classic theory and properties of fads explained by Miller, Hartwick, and Brenton-Miller (2004) makes it easier for managers to associate unethical movements. Classic theory deals with approaches and practices that will last for years (Miller, Hartwick, and Brenton-Miller, 2004). Properties of fads according to Miller et al. (2004) makes it simpler for managers to exit or
…show more content…
The controversial issue, Friedman case emphasize that businesses does not have responsibilities, in regards to, individuals who proctor over the company. In addition, Friedman (1970) address the concern of managers’ responsibilities away from the businesses like his home, his church, his mind, and other social activities. Moreover, his theory refers to mangers as agents; therefore, managers has to act in accordance to the owners’ specification (Friedman, 1970). The sole propriety of the manager is to make a profit while spending someone else’s’ revenue. This know theory is call the “free society” (Friedman, 1970). The research defines free society where an individual cannot impose evil due to the fact that the evil will benefit towards another individual good.
On the other hand, Cohen (2009) viewed that leader obligations were invested within the company plus the performance of the business. The article emphasize that individuals cannot tackle another task until the current social objective is completed (Cohen, 2009). Amongst all aspect, Cohen (2009) exert that subordinates are responsible for task accomplish and not accomplish by the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, the disadvantage of shareholder theory is that it largely ignores other factors that affect the company’s performance. When taken into account, these factors, which include the interests of stakeholders, may benefit the firm in different ways (e.g. happier employees leads to higher productivity, obeying government regulations lessens penalties, sustainable business processes leads to less pressure from environmental activists, social awareness entices customer loyalty, etc). In contrast, stakeholder theory focuses on what the first theory ignores. The changes in business environment that Freeman (1984) took note of in the 1980’s are still affecting firms today.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stockholder Model

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He first criticizes that the dominant model requires stability and predictability, and thus, can be no longer assured because the model is resistant to change, not consistent with law state and not consistent with ethics in today’s world. He argues that business is “a set of relationships among groups which have a stake in the activities that make up the business” (p.97) After that he states his stakeholder approach by listing all those individuals and groups that are affected by the company’s policies, procedures and actions and then argues that, “businesses, and the executives who manage them, actually do and should create value for customers, suppliers, employees, communities, and financiers (or shareholders). And, that we need to pay careful attention to how these relationships are managed and how value gets created for these stakeholders” (p.93) He claims that managerial task and the entrepreneurial task is all about balancing primary and secondary stakeholders’ interests, and thus, a successful business should create value for customers, employees, suppliers, communities and financiers, consumer advocate group, special interest group, government and all other people (p.98). Managers have multiple fiduciary obligations to each group of people, not merely any one of their stakes or stakeholders because…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedman builds a case that (1) a business does not have responsibilities, businessmen do and they are acting as an agent of the principle (the company) and should therefore be serving the interests of the stockholder (Friedman 1970). Gibson (2000) despite supporting stakeholder theory, the component that “an individual surrenders a degree of autonomy to an organisation” (Gibson 2000; p. 252) is still relevant in the traditional view. If the shareholders’ interests are in line with maximising profits than, to a certain extent, so too are the businessmen’s actions. (2) If they were able to spend the profits of stockholders, a big issue would be knowing how much of the profits they are able to spend before it stops being the shareholders’ profits and becomes their losses, hence damaging their competitive advantages (Friedman 1970). Gibson (2000) also supports that it is not adequate for all stakeholders to be given an equal benefit because if stakeholders (other than the shareholders) are given power of influence over the business it is not fair that shareholders are not given, in return, power of influence over society’s communities and initiatives.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It aims to serve its own self-interest. With that being said, it does not mean that corporations do no produce any external benefits or does not help the community in any way. Rather, it means that corporations only produce external benefits when it serves its own purpose in the process. Joel Bakan, the author of the famous book “The Corporation the Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power”, acknowledges the contributions a corporation makes to the community. However, Bakan realizes that these contributions are either an indirect result of a company’s actions or is done to facilitate the company’s goal in the long run.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You work in order to get paid and make money to provide for yourself. If money was irrelevant than nobody would work. Why waste your time to better someone else’s company if there is no incentive for you? Duska ends his paper by saying “If my analysis is correct, the issue of the permissibility of whistleblowing is not a real issue since there is no obligation of loyalty to a company. He is correct in this statement and his paper give an accurate argument of why loyalty…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1421) which presented that a business’ socially responsible acts can shift positively the customers’ insights on the company’s products’ performance. Additionally, they have also noted the CSR’s benefits diminished when consumers ascertain that company’s deeds are self-interest driven as opposed to an act of kindness. The same is consistent with the findings of Kang and Hustvedt (2013, p 262) which showed that consumers’ perception of CSR efforts is a vital aspect of building consumers’ trust leading to their increased intent to subscribe socially responsible firms’ goods and…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A firm’s action can have enormous impacts on its products, though it is in compliance regulatory laws with regards to labour conditions while at the same time violates international laws. The debate about the role and responsibility of firms in contributing to an ecologically and socially viable economy is fuelled by this complexity. In the oil and gas sector there are varieties of social groups involved in trying to shape norms about corporate responsibility, notwithstanding the end results has not been encouraging. For these groups, there are a number of inroads to influencing corporate actions. There various ways of fostering certain corporate practice, such as Legislation, pressure from environmental or social activist groups and consumer boycotts.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While also acknowledging this need, he is also in favor of the benefits of society at large without the benefits to shareholders. Friedman’s exposition is that in order to be good people we must do things that are morally correct and not cheat the shareholders. In the 1970’s Friedman discussed his knowledge on the social responsibility of businesses. He said that the main purpose…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1970 we have to admit that Milton was right about his writing, the only social responsibilities of the Corporate was to make profit for shareholders. Reason why Mr. Friedman argues that a corporation, unlike a person, cannot have responsibility because no one will get in business with a corporate if they realize that the corporate cannot pay its bills.” Only people can have responsibilities” and “presumably, the individuals who are to be responsible are the businessman”.so for that reason, Corporate should have a moral responsibility which is integrity and Ethics we are studying today. There are other rules that businesses must adhere to if they wish to be successful; such as the obvious rules of the marketplace including supply and demand. In addition, as we have seen with the proliferation of ‘new’ technologies, the law usually…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Andreas Hillas Aaron Bartolome Ethics 11/20/17 What Should a Business do? The debate on what a business should do is ever changing. An ethical dilemma for many companies and business alike; but, what is the moral duty of a company? Is it to maximize profits, benefit the consumer, or create a happy community? Someone like Milton Friedman would say that a business does not have a moral obligation to the community, but does have an obligation to maximize profits for shareholders.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays