To Kill My Roommate Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
It is plotted that in 2046 my previous roommate becoming one of the most brutal leaders that killing a lot of innocent people. There would be a chance that to let me to travel back to the university time and kill him, in order to prevent the outbreak of the situation. This essay will argue that killing my roommate to save a lot of innocent people on the future is not a good choice and it is morally wrong although it might save a lot of innocent people. This will be addressed by demonstrating the consequence of killing my roommate and the controversial views on killing my roommate.

First argument that is not to kill my roommate by travelling back to the old time because based on the law system nowadays, killing anyone is prohibited and anyone who violates the law would be sentenced to lifelong imprisonment. Also, killing a person is an act the morally wrong. According to Kantianism purposed by Kant, people should follow the maxim as their living guidelines so that no one should violate other’s human right that the right of living. Moreover, Kant also purpose that we should no use others in order to achieve our purpose, such as killing my roommates to save thousands of innocent lives. By following Kantianism, this purposed me not to kill my teammate to prevent a terrible war in 2046.

Furthermore, another argument that we should not use negative method to repay the price when someone did something negative to us, such as my roommate start the war and kill a lot of innocent people and causing me have to travel back to kill him as to repay and prevent …show more content…
It is because this act is offending my roommate free wills and disobeying the universal maxim of human rights. Moreover, killing my roommate is a contradictory act because it would not bring the best consequence to people. As a result, I would not travel back and kill him to prevent the terrible war which started by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant's All Acceptable Maxim Analysis
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's All Acceptable Maxim Analysis

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Case Study
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Physician Assisted Suicide Case Study

    In the first case of Smith, he expects to inherit a large amount of money if any unexpected thing happens to his six-year-old cousin. One night, when his cousin is taking a bath, Smith slinks into the bathroom and drowns the child. After that, he deliberately makes some arrangements to look like an accident to hide his crime. In the second case of Jones, he also expects to have a large inheritance if his six-year-old cousin dies.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarian Approach To Punishment
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Utilitarian Approach To Punishment

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Criticism On The Retributivism
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's Criticism On The Retributivism

    2.4.2.5. Criticism on the Retributivism The Kantian theories, such as the other ones, have some problems which attract the critics' attractions. The main criticisms are: 1. Despite the punishment is a worldly action, Kant used a metaphysical aim – justice – for it.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Revenge In A Long Way Gone By Ishmael Beah
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Revenge In A Long Way Gone By Ishmael Beah

    Revenge is one of the greatest evils. It is an aspect of humankind that can control the human mind. I don’t agree with the concept an eye for an eye, because revenge can be considered a domino effect. It only creates a cycle of retaliation. All it takes is one incident to duplicate into many more.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    To Kill The Messenger Analysis
    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To Kill The Messenger Analysis

    At the beginning of the documentary entitled “To Kill the Messenger” (2014), President Ronald Reagan publicized that “drug abuse” is the number one public enemy in the United States. The objective of his presidency was policy that would prevent drug trafficking and substance abuse. In October of 1982, Reagan announced the famous “War on Drugs.” He used military terms, such as “battle,” “war,” and “surrender” to describe his campaign to combat drugs (Nunn, 2002). During the campaign, Reagan increased the monetary resources allocated to his anti-drug movement and increased the quantity of drug task.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Case For Reparations Summary
    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Case For Reparations Summary

    As the name of the title aptly suggests, Ta-Nehisi Coates, in his article, “The Case for Reparations”, builds a case for the racial minority, that is black folk, to seek amends for the years of injustice and servitude rendered by them to the majority, here in America. Through the medium of Clyde Ross, a veteran but now ordinary citizen, representative of the plight of any other black person living in that era, Coates attempts to provide an argument for the ills and hardships that the Blacks were faced with throughout the previous few centuries, under the regime of white supremacy, in the land of opportunity. In his article, Coates emphasizes not only on the explicit forms and visible aspects of racism and discrimination prevalent, such as…

    • 2480 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Making A Murderer Analysis
    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Making A Murderer Analysis

    Judicial murder made by inequity legal system In the month after “Making a Murderer” premiered on Netflix, more than 129,000 Americans signed a petition to pardon Avery and Dassey for their convictions to the murder of Halbach and in the book ‘in cold blood’ written by Truman Capote, the two murderers were treated by ignoring the mental problem influence of theirs, they stayed in prison for five years and were finally performed death penalty. After reading the book and watching the TV show, I think these crimes sufficiently prove that there is a fundamental inequity at work in countless branches of legal system. Making a Murderer tells a story about the life of Steven Avery, who was convicted of rape in 1985 and imprisoned for 18 years, despite…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Jeffrey Reiman Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jeffrey Reiman Capital Punishment Analysis

    In a Kantian world with moral laws, capital punishment does not seem to be a theoretical solution for punishing murders. But when someone does commit murder those individuals render their rights, and henceforth would acknowledge their action with consequences, such as capital punishment. Jeffrey H. Reiman presents various argument against the use of capital punishment with no adequate evidence of effectiveness. Capital punishment is a reasonable method to punish offenders for crimes committed, and is used for extremes heinous acts; it is also used under great scrutiny. Instead, Jeffrey H. Reimn conveys the notion of any violation of moral duties should be dealt with that same manner to the offender.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology Vs Consequentialism
    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Deontology Vs Consequentialism

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Philosophy And Abortion Argument
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Philosophy And Abortion Argument

    Using Immanuel Kant 's moral philosophy, we can make an arguable debate. According to Kant 's moral principle, Kant uses categorical imperative: a rule stating what ought to be done based upon pure reason alone and not contingent upon sensible desires. Therefore, moral rules for Kant, have no exceptions. Killing is always wrong. Everyone has good will.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kent Greenwalt On Punishment Analysis
    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kent Greenwalt On Punishment Analysis

    According to Kent Greenwalt (1983), both retributive, as well as the utilitarian perspective in relation to justification of societal punishments were prevailing methodologies. First, the main justifications for punishment using the retributive perspective were that punishment was in place due to the offender deserving to be punished for a specific wrongdoing. Greenwalt states that there is a simple justification for using this perspective, if there is an offender who has violated the law that others have to follow, then the offender is worthy of punishment to reestablish the moral order that has been damaged by the committing of a crime. In this particular perspective, there is a justification in place that the community, society, etc.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary Of Bernard Williams's Moral Dilemma
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Bernard Williams's Moral Dilemma

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Kant's Principle Of Humanity
    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Kant's Principle Of Humanity

    Kant implies that any being that has autonomy and rationality should always treat others with autonomy and rationality as an end. Yet, Kant doesn 't clearly state how people are supposed to treat other humans as an end. The Principle of Humanity doesn 't give us a road map on how to apply a moral action. Kant would most likely reply to this response by saying that people have autonomy and rationality and should know what the moral action of a situation is. Even with Kant’s response, there are still many situations that we might not be able to determine what the moral action is.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay
    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Consequentialism Vs Deontology Essay

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings