Kant's Criticism On The Retributivism

Improved Essays
2.4.2.5. Criticism on the Retributivism
The Kantian theories, such as the other ones, have some problems which attract the critics' attractions. The main criticisms are: 1. Despite the punishment is a worldly action, Kant used a metaphysical aim – justice – for it. That is justice is an indefinable, metaphysical and unlimited conception while punishment is corporeal and tangible and needs a tangible worldly aim, too. The tangible aim for punishment can be defined as being deterrent, incapacitating, etc. while the Kantian punishment would not have this view point.
2. Re-establishing of morality is not the duty of the society.
3. The Retributivism punishment can be considered just as a revenge method since it will not benefit the criminal and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Retributionists believe incarceration is the payment for the crime actually committed. They think the criminal will not repeat their crime because they have accepted responsibility and feel satisfied they have been punished adequately, and have paid back society.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Chapman, there are five functions punishments should fulfill: retribution, specific deterrence, general deterrence, prevention, and rehabilitation. First he relates Western practices to these criteria and estimates that Western imprisonment only in the punishment category, all else is not achieved through America’s current punishment system. Next, he reasons that Eastern culture ’s take on punitive measures achieve all of the criteria but rehabilitation, the ability to help the criminal for life after punishment (Chapman 571). By creating a list of criteria, Chapman sets up boundaries for an argument and is able to show readers in a different way how each system’s measures compare.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the contrary, Robert S. Gerstein, the author of “Capital Punishment- ‘Cruel and Unusual’?: A retributivist Response”, contrasts Long’s argument by taking the retributivist side. Gerstein argues that Long only took a narrow view of Capital Punishment, and Long did not consider the legitimacy of capital punishment. Gerstein also claims that while the society rejects retributivism and considers it to be unethical, they do not fully understand the idea of retributivism.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beccaria, Cesare. On Crimes and Punishments. Translated by Henry Paolucci. Indianapolis: Bobbs- Merrill, 1963. This book describes Beccaria 's dissatisfaction with capital punishment.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If an individual commits a lethal act, the punishment should be appropriate to the crime. For example, retribution requires a proportion between the gravity of the crime and the severity of the punishment (Barr 2010, 3). When a person faces death through the criminal justice system; justice is restored. If the citizens do not resign offenders to their destiny, then there is an apparent imbalance. Some believe Capital punishment is a retributive measure, a way of giving a person a taste of his own medicine while satisfying our deepest instincts for justice (Blecker 2013, 2).…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the eyes to many philosopher’s punishment is seen as a correction method. Regardless of the crime committed, it is still viewed as pain inflicted upon another. Whether it is verbal, physical or emotional. Every state has their own ideologies about why and how an individual should be punished for their crimes. Furthermore, philosophers Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham propose the theories of punishment for how to deal with intentional crimes.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment Philosophy Punishment is seen as one of the pillars of life and society. Yet the view of punishment is deeply intertwined with the different philosophies of punishment that have become norms throughout time. While many see punishment through polarized lenses of retribution and vengeance, it should be utilized as a positive tool towards rehabilitation which in turn turns the heart away from sin.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part B “Most Dangerous Cities” Qs: 1. What reasons does the article give for these high crime rates? LOOK FOR PATTERNS – you should find at LEAST 10 1. Social disorganization: Social institutions that are dysfunctional due to the bad economy. 2.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His ideas, especially in contrast to utilitarianism, give a compelling explanation of why rights violations are wrong. However, in this paper I am going to argue that despite the impact Kant’s theory has made, there are still some weaknesses that should be noted. To begin with, in his “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proportional retributivism, as we discussed in class, requires that punishment must be proportional to crimes. Society is expected to give its most terrible crimes its most terrible punishments. Reiman believes that execution is extremely similar to torture. Killing defenseless human beings enacts the defeat of that person. Although execution may be physically painless, it causes an intense and severe psychological pain.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pain and punishment are two words that interweave with each other in accordance with criminal justice. However, the way an individual is able to interpret these words can develop very different, and influential forms of thinking. Nevertheless, these developed forms of thinking allow individuals to form opinions on the subject, and aid in the formation our state. In this essay I am going to be explaining both Immanuel Kant, and Jeremy Bentham’s individual stances on punishment. This will include the theories of retributivism, and deterrence as leading factors to explain each theory.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Through the criminal justice system, when an individual has broken the law and committed a crime and is found guilty of that crime, they are held accountable for their criminal behavior and activities. Usually, through the use of a judicial decision, the offender is sentenced to undergo a certain penalty to insure the preventation of any and all future criminal activity. The shear purpose of sentencing is not only to punish the criminal and insure the deterrence of future criminal activity, but to keep the public safe. In the present day criminal justice system there are five different sentencing options, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Of them are Retribution, Incapacitation, Deterrence, Rehabilitation, and Restoration. "…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays