Concealed Gun Crime

Decent Essays
There Pro- Concealed Handguns Deter Crime. This possibly used article states that murder rate was reduced by 8.5%, rapes 5%, aggravated assault 7% and robbery at 3% but yet this study was conducted in a 2000 analysis of FBI crime data by economics political commentator John R. Lott Jr. This study is to old and isn’t updated to modern conditions

Our Counter-
This Website is a valid website that states that within states that pass concealed carry laws violence and other crime have increased dramatically and have resulted in more deaths and violent cases. between 1977 and 2010 there has been a over 2% increase in cases murder, 9% increase in the rates of rape, aggravated assault, robbery, auto theft and burglary. According to the Aug. 2012 paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. A 1995 study of five Urban cities. Published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, concludes that the gun homicide rates increased on average 4.5 per 100,000 people. Almost 5 out of every 100,000 people are killed and assassinated. An average of 32 people die everyday due to homicide in the United States.

There Second Pro-Responsible citizens should have the right to arm themselves against
…show more content…
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the majority opinion in the District of Columbia v. Heller “ Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited… the majority of the 19th-entry courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues. In another U.S. Supreme Court case in New Jersey concludes that concealed carry permits should only be given to those with justifiable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States 1980. This was a ruling that allows congress to restrict firearms to a certain group of people, in this case the group being restricted was convicted felons. Another landmark case was Distict of Columbia vs Heller in which the courts ruled that the second amendment guarantees an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia. In addition, that this firearm can constitutionally be used as self-defense. Therefore, the court has ruled that the second amendment must be upheld allowing people to own certain types of guns, however, congress is capable of restricting this…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the arms carrying laws being one of the topics of the day, the recent ruling by the district court in San Diego, California may matter for more people, than just the Sunny State's residents... The 9th Circuit's Peruta decision accurately upheld limits on concealed arms, but evaded the Second Amendment right to open carry. That sets off an interesting precedent, which made a lot of Texan lawyers and pro and anti gun groups to look out and analyze the legal (possible federal-wide) consequences of that…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant in the case that was with Heller, whose last name is Stevens, stated his opinion on the matter. Stevens stated that, “The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to the concern that the power of congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to state sovereignty (Lawnix, par. 15).” Neither in the manuscript of the Second Amendment or in the quarrels in the advocate’s evidence, was there even the least interest of the Framers in limiting of the legislature’s power of controlling the uses of firearms used by the private citizen. Stevens also said, “There is no indication that the Framers intended…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia vs. Heller District of Columbia vs. Heller was a groundbreaking case by the Supreme Court on the issue of an individuals’ right to possess a firearm. The two parties in the case were Dick Anthony Heller, the plaintiff and District of Columbia, the defendant. The issue in the case was: Does the District of Columbia’s prohibition on the possession of usable handguns in the home violate the 2nd Amendment? The background of this case is: The District of Columbia passes a law regarding the possession of handguns, which was requiring license for all handguns, and requiring all handguns to be unloaded and the trigger being sealed.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Texas of 2011 the gun murder rate way at 699 deaths in that one year alone. Putting our state in the whole U.S as number two in the higher firearm murders behind California. It's now 2016, three years later, the rate has tremendously increased since then. There is always that story on unsupervised children getting a hold of a gun in their house hold. Just a few years back my little cousin was last seen at his friend's house playing 2k when all of a sudden he's dead.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Thomas wrote that the 2nd Amendment is fully applicable to states because the right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment as a privilege of American citizenship 6. How does the majority respond the the arguments presented by the city of Chicago? Answer - By a five to four margin, the Court held that the second Amendment protects an individual right to possess firearms for lawful use, such as self-defense.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    13 Amendment Pros And Cons

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Today, this amendment is one of the biggest topics discussed over, especially during election season. This amendment states that citizens have a right to bear arms. In 2008 the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller the court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own a gun for personal use. However, the decision only applied to federal laws and did not address local and state laws so in July of 2010 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal right to bear arms also applies at the state and local level. The reasons for why people own guns vary depending on the person.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law enforcement officers and 622 other people were killed nationally this past year (not in self defense) by private individuals legally allowed to carry concealed handguns. Concealed handgun permit holders in Texas were arrested for weapon-related offenses at a rate 81% higher than the rest of the Texas population. Also criminals are more likely to carry a gun if they suspect that victims may also be armed. Felons report that they often carry firearms to deter victims from resisting. (http://gun-control.procon.org/)…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Case Summary

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages

    out any of the modern guns as well as the guns that were around when the constitution was made. Another important court case is United States V. Masciandaro. This case is important to the Second Amendment. The case is about carrying a concealed weapon in plain view, a young man and his girlfriend where visiting a state park in Virginia. One of the park police officers noticed that their truck was not parked correctly in between the lines and got out of his vehicle to examine Masciandaro’s truck and when he did he noticed the gun, and called for backup (Halbrook).…

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Debate

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some citizens worry that people with a gun permit might take action too quickly because access to a weapon is only an arm’s reach away. Although some may argue about concealed weapon carriers being a threat to public safety, statistics have shown the opposite. Since May 2007, there have only been 863 deaths caused by someone with a concealed weapon permit, while 60,000 homicides in the United States in the same amount of time. Based on these numbers, only 0.014 percent of the murders were caused by someone with a permit (Concealed Carry…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Amendment

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The second amendment of the United States of America says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This is the law that makes an outline for what all of the other gun laws must be. So naturally, the words of this amendment are twisted to mean different things. These things normally being either for or against gun restriction laws. The side of the argument that is in favor of heavy gun control laws says that this amendment, “...only protects state’s rights to maintain militias and not an individual’s right to own any gun he or she wants to” (“Washingtonpost”).…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun Abuse Report

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Gun abuse is becoming more violent and needed to get taken care of in the U.S. People should pay more attention to how guns are being used. People are killing each other because of hate and not for defense. I’m against gun abuse and in my opinion all guns should be taken away including cops. People all over the world are getting killed of a gun crime every single year that is not good. People are taking gun control too seriously in the text it states,” At the 2014 homicide rate roughly 1 out of 285 americans will be murdered in a whole year.”…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, A journalist from CNN took a different approach at gun control, he gathered data from violent crimes to show how effective guns were at defending. He says, “Over the period from 2007-2011, when roughly six million nonfatal violent crimes occurred each year, data from the National Crime Victimization Survey show that the victim did not defend with a gun in 99.2% of these incidents.” This is a very interesting piece of evidence that could be key for pro gun control supporters. At a stunning 99.2% of those involved in a violent crime did not use a firearm to defend themselves. This is a huge talking point for the pro side because one of the arguments for those against the use of gun control say that it provides protection when needed.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays