The defendant in the case that was with Heller, whose last name is Stevens, stated his opinion on the matter. Stevens stated that, “The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to the concern that the power of congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to state sovereignty (Lawnix, par. 15).” Neither in the manuscript of the Second Amendment or in the quarrels in the advocate’s evidence, was there even the least interest of the Framers in limiting of the legislature’s power of controlling the uses of firearms used by the private citizen. Stevens also said, “There is no indication that the Framers intended
