Comparison Of Roman And Carthaginian Governments

Decent Essays
However, Rome was had a republic government led by consuls, and also a powerful senate. He had what we call Comitia which was the name for the Assembly; and contrary to Carthage, the real power was at the hands of a great body of loyal citizens. Her government placed the army in the hands of the civil magistrates or consul (Morey, 1901).
I notice that the strength and the greatness of a country, do not almost always depend on the form of government established in this country. They depend on the people placed to elaborate constructive strategies for the progress of the country. Both Roman and Carthaginian governments seemed to have same organization, but not their strategies were really different. Although both had strength and resources,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Roman Republic was a democracy, however, the subject can be tentative because of the limitations that were set on the people. Power in the state belonged to the people through the ability to vote officials into office. This ensured that leadership was not hereditary. In this way, the people chose who they wanted in power, not the person with the right last name or the person with the most money.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better empire than the Athenian Empire. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people supporting and expanding the government; giving citizens many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger, and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than the Athenian government is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ On Rome's Government

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome’s government was particularly democratic considering the people were given absolute power. Bearing in mind that the people made decisions for their sake, rather than it being decided for them, constructed the democracy. Particularly, everyone had the power to vote, including free slaves, as well as having the people participating in government. Evidently, Rome was truly a democracy, and gave absolute power to the people.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire is unique in its original and effective ideas Ancient Rome’s government set an example for future countries that used it as generations passed. Rome established a Republic, where citizens voted for The Great Roman empire also contributed a great deal of great ideas of their time and use today, such as the development of the alphabet, sewers and sanitation, the original concept of “lawyers”, and roads. The Roman Empire did invent “Aqueducts, Underfloor heating, Concrete and the Julian Calendar (which our modern calendar is based on.)” (bbc.com).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their government was majorly people-run, meaning commonplace people and aristocrats shared governing power; they didn’t have a king. Citizens gave power to elected representatives under one condition: the foremost goal remained promotion of common welfare of the people, and they were required to place that goal above their own interests. How did this influence the Founding Fathers and philosophers internationally? For Americans, their main goal was to abolish Great Britain’s reign over the U.S. and become an independently-run country, therefore the Roman Republic was an excellent model of a balanced government. As for many philosophers, this was an admirable government model as well.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stevens, 2003), Caesar was able to exercise significant political control over Rome. The view that it was, “simpler to follow the blast of a trumpet than the swirl of contradictory obligations that had always characterized civilian life,” (Holland T, 2003) made up the framework of Caesar’s ability to gain power. His rise to dictatorship threatened the system which the Republic survived on, specifically the strict set of checks and balances that disabled any possibility for a sole individual to gain absolute power. His ability to dominate the Senate, magistrate and the people of Rome, threatened the Senate in particular, stated in the…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was a government that influenced our…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic used a system of senatorial representation that encompassed a very large population. Developed after the expulsion of the last Etruscan king, the roman government was created to exclude the development of tyranny. It contained checks and balances to ensure that power was never too concentrated. One of the reasons the Roman government was so effective was the stability ensured by Roman laws, since the days of the Law of the Twelve Tables, developed during the early Republic, the Roman legal formula…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman senate. The Roman senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World Studies Period 7 Mrs. Mann The Roman Republic and the Common Good By, Samantha Schmitz Introduction Ancient Rome is known to be a powerful and well put together civilization that was somewhat meeting the common good. The reason that Ancient Rome was a successful city was because they had a republic. A republic is a democracy where the people of Rome get to choose their leaders. The city had a huge population with a strong government.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the roman republic had a leader than it lives up to its name but they didn’t have one. The had other people controlling the society “In Roman society, the aristocrats were known as patricians. “The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls, or leaders, who ruled the Roman Republic. A senate composed of patricians elected these consuls. At this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government.”…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They also set up a Greek style government. Rome became a major center of the Hellenistic culture that went out across the western Mediterranean and Europe. When Rome became a city-state, social tension was already there. The wealthy sat with the senate while everyone else were known as plebs. A social and political system that let people have power…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Morey, Rome grew as it expanded its reaches across the Mediterranean, obtaining power over the majority of Latium, northern Campania, southern Etruria, the Sabine country, Picenum, and a portion of Umbria (Morey, 1901). Roman power also consisted of the thirty-three tribes, the Roman colony citizens who would colonnade where they pleased claiming Roman territory, and the Roman municipia territories. Along with the Roman owned territories, the Romans were associated with a multitude of allies through treaties that required their allies to come to their defense in an act of war. Furthermore, the Romans had a strong governmental structure that was in comparison similar to that of the Carthage, however Rome had better organization when it came to its government and perhaps, this is a reflection of the victories throughout the Punic Wars over Carthage. With a structured government, came a mighty and efficient army.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays