Compare And Contrast Greek Government Vs Roman Government

Improved Essays
The Roman Empire was a better than then the empire of Greece. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people to support and expand the government; giving citizens, many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct.

The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than Greece is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots. The group of men in the Roman Senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government having the Roman Senate was good because the Senate was their way of keeping the government stable. In the Roman Senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of
…show more content…
In the Roman Empire if you were a citizens you could own property, accuse people of wrong doing and vote unless you were a women and then you could only vote and own property. Since you could accuse someone for doing something bad then you could get that person out of the government and that person could have been a threat to the government. When you get rid of the people that could be a threat to the government it improves the government because the people can hurt the government are gone. All roman citizens could vote which means in elections more people are voting which gave more accurate results on big decisions like who is going to rule. As a rule when you get rid of people that could hurt the government then you are a good government because there ain't people that are making the government a bad place. As a rule when more people are voting on elections there will be accurate results because there are lots of people to make the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Evidence: “The Roman senate…usually came from the oldest Roman families and inherited their seats.” Explanation: The Romans had a fixed system where the people with the most amount of knowledge of the land made the decisions unlike Athens who let any inexperienced person step into office. Evidence: “The Senate had primary responsibilities for foreign relations, including selecting ambassadors, making treaties, and creating…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Citizenship Rome and Athens which is better system? Rome had a better system of citizenship because they had citizenship for non-Romans, Rome censors and citizenship levels, and Rome order and stability of senate. One reason the Rome system of citizenship was better because Rome had citizenship for non-Romans. The evidence of this is in document A, it says that Rome allowed women, children, and a sons of a freed slave can be a citizen.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their government was majorly people-run, meaning commonplace people and aristocrats shared governing power; they didn’t have a king. Citizens gave power to elected representatives under one condition: the foremost goal remained promotion of common welfare of the people, and they were required to place that goal above their own interests. How did this influence the Founding Fathers and philosophers internationally? For Americans, their main goal was to abolish Great Britain’s reign over the U.S. and become an independently-run country, therefore the Roman Republic was an excellent model of a balanced government. As for many philosophers, this was an admirable government model as well.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Analysis

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Another reason the Roman empire was a better emperor than the Greek empire is because they let many people by citizens. In the Roman Empire all people were considered citizens unless you were a slave or your parents were either not born in certain areas or were not Roman citizens (Document A). The roman empire letting many people be citizens brought in people because you would rather go to a place where you would be a citizen then a place where you wouldn't. Many people joining the Roman empire brought in people with good ideas and people who could make good laws or could even be a good ruler. People would not want to join the greek empire if they were not going to be a citizen which limits the amount of people trying to improve the government…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fall of the Roman Empire In approximately 200 AD, the ruling power of Greece started to diminish whereas the Roman Empire continued to expand at an exponential rate. The Roman Army persisted in their efforts to seize territory, and was so thorough in its imperialistic endeavors that it grew to an impressive size. Rome, obtaining the title of preeminent empire of the ancient world for several centuries, was comprised of various elements from successful societies such as the Greeks and Etruscans. These foreign lands impacted the republican government organization and further political ideology as well as the basic social and religious morals of the Roman people. Compared to all healthy governments, Western Rome faced trials regarding its…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Was Rome Successful

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Romans had a well thought out government, which is believed to have been made after the government of Sparta made by Lycurgus. If this is so, the Romans did make changes to the original plan. This government was designed so that each level of government could not try to take all power for itself. This form of rule worked for the Romans until Julius Caesar took hold of it.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman government could be seen as an entire different entity, that had and wanted nothing to do with Roman society other than taxes. The lack of a government and no repercussions to crime deeply rooted the idea that violence was the only way to receive…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Decline Of Roman Empire

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The influential and dominant Roman Empire fell due to overexpansion which led to the Empire being split and created vulnerability among the Empire. When Romulus Augustus died, the Roman Empire lost sight of their polytheistic and slave driven society, which lead to disagreement of right and wrong amidst the people. After Romulus Augustus no one man was able to govern the whole Roman Empire, this forced Diocletian to divide Rome into two Empires, the Western and Eastern Empire. Once Rome had lost their dominant ruler, they became vulnerable and weak to outside attacks, this lead to a decline in trade and overall income which made it impossible for the Empire to survive. The prosperous Roman Empire was founded in 27 BC, but after grueling outside…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman government had large expenses because they used most of their money on the maintenance of their army. The effect of the high taxation led tenants to flee from their farms and businessmen and workmen from their occupation. The establishment of a governmental welfare system made people lean on the the government for welfare. People learned to expect something from nothing (Haskell, n.d.) The problems of the military is also what contributed to the fall of the Western Roman Empire.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Things like a democratic republic system, level of global power, and our judicial system. Ancient Rome’s republic was ruled by two consuls who held the highest position of power. Consuls could decide political and military action and proposed legislation, much like our president today. Under these consuls, there was the senate which was made up of around 300 patricians who voted on who the consuls should be.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the period of 1150 B.C.E up until about 300 B.C.E the interaction between the Persian, Greek, Roman and Byzantine empires have shaped each culture. Through war, trade, religion, migration and expansion these Empire have clashed, and merged and scattered. Although Each Empire varies in core values, government, literature and art, it is easy to find connections to one another through the timeline of each individual Empire. The competition for territory and advancements pushed these cultures forward, in action and reaction to each other; each empire effected one another in unique ways. Some values and beliefs and customs carried on through time, changed to fit the needs of the individual culture or were tossed out altogether.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The rise, development, and the continuance of the Greek civilization was one of the most influential aspects of many other ancient and modern day societies. Although other civilizations undoubtedly have their own way of operating in their respective societies, Greek life was unique in the fact that they were not physically united as one. “The country's rough terrain and geographically isolated settlements prevented the Greeks from forming a highly centralized, inland empire like the Egyptians. So they adapted their settlement pattern to the prevailing geography and settled in small, independent city-states nestled in valleys between the mountains, many of which were located near the sea.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays