Comparing Manifest Destiny And The Gift Outright

Improved Essays
Westward expansion involved the removal of the Indians from their land and the migration west of settlers. The strongest supporters of these events include John Sullivan - author of "Manifest Destiny", Andrew Jackson - author of "On Indian Removal", and Robert Frost - author of "The Gift Outright". The expansion happened so rapidly that the Indians opinions were never taken into consideration. John L. Sullivan believed that America was destined for greatness and had a fixed destiny. Our country will progress rapidly and forever be based on human equality. "The American people have derived their origin from many other nations,... America is destined for better deeds" (Sullivan pg.1). John Sullivan wrote as if he knew what our country would amount to. We, the American people, have taken our origin from various other nations and wrapped it all into one to make it our own. He thought that in order to maintain civilization, refinement, and human liberty, we mustn't forget the monarchies …show more content…
He didn't understand their unwillingness to "submit to laws of the states." He stated, "...the policy of the general government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous...to save him from alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation" (Jackson pg.2), to prove that point. Even though the settlers were willing to pay for the move of the Indians, it wasn't right to assume they would want to take that opportunity. He thought that the removal would benefit both the settlers and the Indians. He thought they would have gained more by moving to a permanent residence and in turn only lose partial bits of land. "And it is supposed that the wandering savage has a stronger attachment to his land than the settled, civilized Christian?" (Jackson pg.2). The Indians' thoughts should have been recognized. The settlers had no right to up and move the Indians without their willing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Inskeep, Steve. Jacksonland: President Andrew Jackson, Cherokee Chief John Ross, and a Great American Land Grab. Penguin Group USA, 2016” In Jacksonland by Steve Inskeep talks about the different states and different territories that were divided by the “white men “and American Indians own concepts of democracy. Inskeep interlaces together the stories of Andrew Jackson a general, president and author of the Indian removal and John Ross chief of the Cherokee.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Meacham, a three-time New York best seller, a native of Nashville, and a recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for American Lion, Meacham is an accomplished writer. He received a degree in English literature and had been editor for numerous organizations. While his notorieties should be praised, his background must be noted that he did not earn a degree in History. His writing was vivid and engaging; it was easy to get engrossed by his book. While the literature was impeccable, it should still be noted the historiography is slightly lacking.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Man on the Twenty Dollar Bill The past and its people are often romanticized. One such character of early American history that was romanticized was Andrew Jackson. Yet author James C. Curtis does not romanticize Jackson’s actual achievements, and also tells of his faults and flaws in his book Andrew Jackson and the Search for Vindication.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of these problems were a fear of causing unneeded violence and disruption in a community of people, the indians, who had not created a whole lot of problems for us other than being on the land we wanted. Jackson would also have to relocate the indians, which was going to take time and money and probably cost a lot of lives. Jackson continued with his plan to move the indians even though it would cause a lot of conflict between the already pissed off Indians and Americans. He also continued with the removal knowing that some lives of the indians were going to be lost. The outcome was a death of 25% of the 16,000…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy”... (Doc 2) Jackson was open minded about the Indian tribes. This allowed him to have a future friendship, or in a sense, loyalty towards each other. This loyalty was carried on for some time and then Jackson authorized all Native Americans to be removed from the Southeast states of Georgia, Mississippi, & Alabama and moved west of the Mississippi River after gold was found on Cherokee land in Georgia. Some of the major tribes that were affected were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most well-known acts of Jackson’s doing was the forced relocation of Native American tribes from the Southeast by way of the Indian Removal act. The Trail of Tears is a reminder of the cruelty he indorsed towards those not Caucasian. He did not see them as deserving the full rights he and other white Americans were afforded, regardless of the fact that America was occupied by them centuries prior to Europe’s arrival. I highly disagree with the resettlement he forced upon the Native Americans. It was their land, yet he forced hundreds of innocent Native women, men, and children to trek upon miles of unknown land with no protections from the harsh elements at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jackson Democrats committed themselves to western expansion, which in turn forced more than 120,000 Native Americans that have lived within their respective territories for hundreds of years to move west through the passing of the Indians removal act (textbook). Jackson forced thousands of Native Americans to embark on the Trail of Tears to their new territories, a journey that killed thousands of them. These actions come in direct contrast to the 1831 Supreme Court ruling that allowed for Cherokee Indians to have self rule and for the United States government not to interfere with it (textbook). No person should be able to force the mass movement of a community, especially of one that they do not have specific jurisdiction and rule over, displaying his satisfaction in creating societal turmoil without considering the people that his actions are…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A specific example of American Westward Expansion is the Indian Removal Act. With Americans pushing past boundaries of the states’ borders, white infringement onto native land was inevitable, and the rise of tensions and violence on the frontier ensued. To protect Americans and encourage movement west, government officials knew something had to be done about the natives. An advocate for Westward Expansion, President Andrew Jackson (1829), required the natives’ submit to the American government if they wanted protection from American’s taking their land. Knowing the natives would choose to remain independent, President Jackson (1829) proposed to, “[set] apart an ample district.... to the Indian tribes,” so that, “they may be secured in the enjoyment of governments of their own choice,” (para. 4).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He used many Cherokees and some friendly creeks in the “Battle of Horseshoe Bend.” The battle was victorious and although many white and Indian lives were lost, the Red Stick Indians had been defeated and territory in the creek country had been gained. But while the Cherokee Indians stood by Jackson’s side against the enemy Red Stick Indians, this peaceful friendship would soon come to a screeching halt for Jackson believed the Indians must completely submit to the United States. He told the Indians that “both friendly and formerly hostile, they must pay for the expenses incurred by the United States in fighting the war with the Red Sticks.” (Morgan, Robert.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Professor Daniel Feller talks in his article Andrew Jackson’s Shifting Legacy about how Andrew Jackson has received so much fame. He has not done anything as nearly significant as other presidents have, but yet he is almost always ranked in the top ten presidents. Jackson has a whole era dedicated to him, whereas other presidents simply belong to eras. Some of the main things Jackson did were that he defeated the British at the Battle of New Orleans, dealt with the Nullification Crisis, had famous vetoes, and signed the Indian Removal Act. In Feller’s concluding sentence, he says that Americans will continue to argue about Jackson.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The territory expansion during the Westward expansion made it possible for the U.S. to acquire more land and in fact, its territory expanded almost 60%. With the United States increasing in land, it open doors to new discoveries, while also giving the American people a chance to experience freedom. However, there wasn’t a lot of Americans thrilled about the idea of going into Native Americans and Mexican territory and taking over their land. It took people like John O’Sullivan in 1839 to speak on the topic so people can have faith about what can come. In 1839, John O’Sullivan became an advocate for the idea of Manifest Destiny, which simply mean that the expansions of the westward area of the country was both justified and predictable.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays