He didn't understand their unwillingness to "submit to laws of the states." He stated, "...the policy of the general government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous...to save him from alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation" (Jackson pg.2), to prove that point. Even though the settlers were willing to pay for the move of the Indians, it wasn't right to assume they would want to take that opportunity. He thought that the removal would benefit both the settlers and the Indians. He thought they would have gained more by moving to a permanent residence and in turn only lose partial bits of land. "And it is supposed that the wandering savage has a stronger attachment to his land than the settled, civilized Christian?" (Jackson pg.2). The Indians' thoughts should have been recognized. The settlers had no right to up and move the Indians without their willing
He didn't understand their unwillingness to "submit to laws of the states." He stated, "...the policy of the general government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous...to save him from alternative, or perhaps utter annihilation" (Jackson pg.2), to prove that point. Even though the settlers were willing to pay for the move of the Indians, it wasn't right to assume they would want to take that opportunity. He thought that the removal would benefit both the settlers and the Indians. He thought they would have gained more by moving to a permanent residence and in turn only lose partial bits of land. "And it is supposed that the wandering savage has a stronger attachment to his land than the settled, civilized Christian?" (Jackson pg.2). The Indians' thoughts should have been recognized. The settlers had no right to up and move the Indians without their willing