Andrew Jackson's Response To The Trail Of Tears

Improved Essays
One of the most well-known acts of Jackson’s doing was the forced relocation of Native American tribes from the Southeast by way of the Indian Removal act. The Trail of Tears is a reminder of the cruelty he indorsed towards those not Caucasian. He did not see them as deserving the full rights he and other white Americans were afforded, regardless of the fact that America was occupied by them centuries prior to Europe’s arrival. I highly disagree with the resettlement he forced upon the Native Americans. It was their land, yet he forced hundreds of innocent Native women, men, and children to trek upon miles of unknown land with no protections from the harsh elements at all. It is truly tragic. There is nothing I can agree with about his decision.
I also disagree with the way he attempted to force the states to rescind the right to turn down Federal decisions that were not done with the interests of the states in mind. Jackson encouraged a strong federal government. When the Nullification Crisis occurred, he was known to actively threaten those who would go in opposition to the federal government’s decision, despite the fact that they had the right to. He was furious that South Carolina would dare defy his rule and nullify the tariff he had placed benefiting industries in the North. He went as far as to threaten to
…show more content…
His use of the spoils system effectively polluted the government. Rather than replace seats with those that could actually help American relations, he removed government officials from office and replaced them with corrupt friends and acquaintances to gain political power and favors for himself. As a presidency, favoritism should never rule your decision to put into place new political figures. By doing so, he showed his ability to strengthen the power of the president and remove the say so of the states, something that was selfish and did more harm than

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Andrew Jackson played an important role in the age of economic nationalism and growing political sectionalism. Economic nationalism is a circumstance in which a country attempts to preserve its personal economy by minimizing the amount of imports and investments from other countries. Political sectionalism is the support of a particular part of the United States of specific political interests. Economic nationalism and political sectionalism can be seen in Andrew Jackson’s actions in the South Carolina nullification crisis, the Bank War, and the Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson argued that the legitimization for state invalidation of government laws was misinformed, unlawful, and treasonous to the nation.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Last of all, opponents to Meacham may find Jackson’s biography to be inaccurate in portraying Jackson’s motives and goals: to become the voice of the people (Meacham 46). They could argue that Jackson ignored of the Southern plight during the Nullification Crisis and that he could have listened to its people to deal with the situation easier and that most of his actions seemed corrupt; however, Jackson did in fact succeed in increasing the average person’s voice into the government. Though he didn't listen to the southern people during the nullification crisis and threatened the use of force, he believed that secession was treason and that the state government was responsible so he acted in the way he knew best. Most of all, Jackson succeeded…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One, in particular, happens to be his decision to veto the bill rechartering the national bank. Jackson argued that the bank was unconstitutional and gave too much power to congress, “It is to be regretted,” he said, “that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes” (Doc 2); therefore he distributed the funds to individual state banks and made it more fair for the common man. However, this settlement, along with the Species Circular, also enacted by Jackson, progressed the nation to the panic of 1837. This was a financial crisis, corrupting the economy, the state banks, and businesses that eventually lead the nation to major depression.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson Pros And Cons

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Native Americans. When it comes to Native American history, Jackson ranks right up there with the worst genocidal tyrants. Because white Southerners in the early 19th century craved the land inhabited by native tribes like the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Seminole, Creek and Cherokee, they needed the government to expel the original inhabitants so they could seize the property for themselves. Although the law only permitted voluntary and peaceful removals of natives from their land, Jackson ignored the law…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curtis explains that initially Jackson had no quarrel with the Native Americans because they never had harmed anyone in his family, but tensions between them and other westerners influenced his views (22). As Jackson grew older his words on Native Americans grew harsher and showed how he hated them for their disorder. Later when Jackson was a military man, he took to slaughtering so many Native Americans. He did this to the Creeks who had sided with the British and attacked Fort Mims in 1813 (Curtis 49). Yet during his presidency, when tensions with the United States and the Native Americans were high, Jackson said that “Indians are subjects of the United Stated” (Curtis 71).…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson may have acted as if he wanted to help the African Americans, especially in his address to the free blacks stating, “Through a mistaken policy you have heretofore been deprived of a participation in the glorious struggle for national rights, in which our country is engaged. This shall no longer exist…,” but in reality, he is just a hypocrite when comes to actually helping…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Tariff Dbq

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hayne threatened secession and was ready to start a civil war if the tariff was not lifted; thus restoring the liberties of South Carolina. Andrew Jackson’s job as the president of the Union was to uphold the laws stated in the Constitution and he believed he was doing so accordingly by placing a tariff on South Carolina’s…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How has the power of the presidency changed over time? Drawing upon some historical examples, explain how presidents have acted to secure more power. What can the modern president do to overcome congressional, judicial, or bureaucratic opposition? How is a more powerful president beneficial/detrimental? Reference course readings, lectures, and examples as appropriate.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Outline

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “ Jackson defined himself not by enacting a legislative program but by thwarting one”. The fact that he vetoed laws goes to show you the way that he cared for the nation enough to veto things that he thought was…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the decisions that Jackson made were based strongly on his different background. We see this in his strong opposition to the national bank and also see how his personal life intermingled itself in this affair. Nicholas Biddle, the wellborn president of the national bank, was everything that Jackson was not and therefore was a strong enemy to Jackson. Due to this, Jackson made it a goal of his presidency to close the national bank. Andrew also felt this system benefited the northern industry more than the southern farmers.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jackson Democrats committed themselves to western expansion, which in turn forced more than 120,000 Native Americans that have lived within their respective territories for hundreds of years to move west through the passing of the Indians removal act (textbook). Jackson forced thousands of Native Americans to embark on the Trail of Tears to their new territories, a journey that killed thousands of them. These actions come in direct contrast to the 1831 Supreme Court ruling that allowed for Cherokee Indians to have self rule and for the United States government not to interfere with it (textbook). No person should be able to force the mass movement of a community, especially of one that they do not have specific jurisdiction and rule over, displaying his satisfaction in creating societal turmoil without considering the people that his actions are…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed it was his duty to rid the government of those he deemed aristocrats (Document 6), and wanted to get revenge on those whom he deemed responsible for his wife’s death. The idea behind making the common man more involved seems a very democratic ideal, but the way Jackson went about it was not democratic. One instance is the Eaton Affair, in which his secretary of state John Eaton was accused of marrying a harlot. If true this would defame Jackson’s entire cabinet and his presidency, however instead of ousting them Jackson and Martin Van Buren both defended the Eaton’s to the chagrin of the rest of his cabinet. Because of this Jackson began to rely more heavily on what was deemed his “kitchen cabinet”, a group of men whom he relied on more heavily for advice than those in his actual cabinet.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eulogy For Andrew Jackson

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Jackson knew we were over populating an were doing us a favor by killings all those people. Lastly, the Cherokee Indians would like to thank Andrew Jackson because when we one the Worcester vs Georgia case, which stated the Cherokee nation was a distinct community in which the laws of Georgia had no force, Georgia decided to ignore the court ruling and kick us off. Jackson smartly did nothing about it and agreed to kick us…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Jackson went against Supreme Court decision with the Indian Removal Act and the South Carolina Resolutions, showing opposing actions to what many believed. Jacksonians went against the Supreme Court decisions in the Worchester vs. Georgia ruling. He enforced the Indian Removal Act in which Indians were forced to move westward for the benefit of the white man. (G) The…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays