The Negative Impacts Of Westward Expansion And The Mexican War

Improved Essays
While America began to expand and become more industrialize, not everybody agreed with the ideas and concepts. Due to the difference in opinion there was a lot of controversy and voiced opinions about the westward expansions. While some Americans supported Westward expansions, there was others who opposed Westward expansions. Also some Americans supported the Mexican War, while others opposed the Mexican war. However, both the Westward expansion and the Mexican war had positive and negative effects to the country we live in today. The Westward expansion gave America a chance to expand its territory, while having a chance double the land area of the United States also increased goods, services and wealth but more importantly it gave Americans …show more content…
The territory expansion during the Westward expansion made it possible for the U.S. to acquire more land and in fact, its territory expanded almost 60%. With the United States increasing in land, it open doors to new discoveries, while also giving the American people a chance to experience freedom. However, there wasn’t a lot of Americans thrilled about the idea of going into Native Americans and Mexican territory and taking over their land. It took people like John O’Sullivan in 1839 to speak on the topic so people can have faith about what can come. In 1839, John O’Sullivan became an advocate for the idea of Manifest Destiny, which simply mean that the expansions of the westward area of the country was both justified and predictable. As I mentioned above, many was not comfortable with coming into …show more content…
Whenever there is a conflict or situation with territorial more than likely there a fight or war involved. The Westward expansion was no different. While there was people like John O’Sullivan who was advocates for westward expansion, there where people like W.E. Channing who did not agree with the concept of westward expansion or Manifest Destiny. In W.E. Channing editorial Denouncing Expansion he wrote “Having unfolded the argument against the annexation of Texas from the criminality of the revolt, I proceed to second very solemn consideration, namely, that by this act our country will enter of a career of encroachment, war, and crime, and will merit and incur the punishment and woe of aggravated wrong-doing. The seizure of Texas will not stand alone. It will darken our future history” (Channing 236). Channing made valuable points, because starting a war in your own country reflects the country bad. Channing also believed that by the believing in manifest destiny that it will start a trend that it is acceptable to go and fight for whatever you want until you get it, which will ultimately start more problems. Briefly in W.E. Channing Denouncing Expansion he wrote “Hitherto I have spoken of the annexation of Texas embroiling us with Mexico; but it will not stop here. It will bring us into collisions with other states” (Channing 237). Which again Channing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The idea of provoking the war implies that the war’s happening is the fault of the American people. If this is true, than America is the cause of the loss of countless lives as well. Thus, President Polk established the Mexican­ American War on the intentional destruction of life which is explicitly banned upon in the nation 's…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This would only lead to the Native Americans accumulating anger and revenge towards the new nation. The influence from the United States would also ignited their actions towards Mexico as they sought to hurt and wound it. For example in the article “Independent Indians and the U.S- Mexican War” Brian Delay says that “Comanche’s, Navajos, and Kiowa’s attacked Northern Mexican Settlements, invaded ranches and stole cattle” (35). This was beneficial to the U.S because it caused Political division between Mexicans. It left confusion between Mexican’s deciding whether or not they can really have control over these indigenous territories.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This policy was implemented in the 1800s and the claiming of Texas, Oregon, and California proved the effectiveness. I believe that the United States achieved the Manifest Destiny politically because Americans were able to expand the westward as of the belief of the God-given right. The belief made them to acquire Texas, Oregon, and California. I don’t think the U.S. achieved the Manifest Destiny morally and ethically because their purpose to acquire westward land killed many people, for example the Mexican-American War, battle of San Jacinto, and several other battles. To conclude with, the belief of manifest destiny was achieved successfully because of acquiring of land from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Manifest Destiny was believed as God’s plan to extend American territory. Polk also was thinking about buying California too, but right now his mission was gaining Texas. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because most were supporters of Manifest Destiny, the Americans rebelled trying to get Texas out of hostage, and Texas wants to be apart of America anyways so Texans might as well be Americans. In 1812, war caused to threat to England. Then in 1836 Texas gained its Independence…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, as Polk insisted, it is the country’s and its citizens’ duty to “…vindicate with decision [to go to war for] the honor, the rights, and the interests of [the] country.” (p. 75). However, it’s extremely important to note Polk’s desire to acquire California. Polk had previously attempted to buy California before these conflicts had even arisen. He wanted to prevent Britain from making any claims on the land and also held knowledge of gold and silver in the area that would eventually lead to the Gold Rush. Thus, by being able to declare war against Mexico with accusations that were seen as skeptic to many, he would be able to kill two birds with one…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mexican Empire

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let our arms now be carried with a spirit which shall teach the world that, while we are not forward for a quarrel, America knows how to crush, as well as how to expand” A justifiable reason was required by the United States to claim these lands without force and war was the answer to this. So war was incited through provocations army overstepping their boundaries when confronting the…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, the Mexican-American war was not justified. Originally, when the Americans began spreading the idea of manifest destiny, the Mexicans, in general, had two attitudes towards it. Some admired this idea, however, some also feared it. They were concerned that the Americans would start trying to expand into Mexico and basically push the borders. However, Americans paid very little attention to what Mexico was thinking or saying.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early stages of America’s expansion a few major factors motivated the expansion towards the west. America is a new country at this time, and is dealing with its new power and responsibility. People in America at the time looked towards the future wealth they could obtain by expanding west. With the new unknown land to the west, the American people needed motivation to expand westward. The politics that motivated westward expansion revolved around the indigenous people on the land, a big ideology which spurred westward expansion was Manifest Destiny, and the economic factor for this expansion was slavery and its role in the industrialization of America.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some long term effects on the territory weren’t good either, such as territorial disputes and the growing tension it brought with slavery. The nation had gained the land from the French, but the Indians still fought back and so did the Spanish on the western border. The long term effects were the expansion of America, now being able to grow in population, economics, strength, and unity. All the long term effects that were positive gave that nation the extra push to become the great nation it is…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The authors provide clear evidence on how imperialism can have a negative influence on Americans. They both believe that the anti-imperialists were against American policy because they argue that it was unfair to offer illogical reasons to occupy other countries. For example, Larrabee declares that the United States wanted to help the Philippines Islands to get rid of its weak powers so the U.S. can join this country to make a stronger nation. DeCosse also acknowledges that President Bush declared war by providing uncertain causes that were not; furthermore, that’s because Iraq was an oil-rich country and Bush wanted to benefit the U.S. economically. Anti-imperialism is an act of those who care about human nations rights of maintaining their territories, obtaining freedom, and defending themselves.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics