Compare And Contrast Multicultural And Traditional Psychology

1687 Words 7 Pages
Register to read the introduction… This implies that in cross-cultural research a scientist should ensure that concepts or variables understudy has similar meaning from one culture to another. Reliability and bias continue to constitute a problem in cross-cultural research. When two or more researchers are involved, it becomes pertinent that they should agree in respect of what was observed. By involving two or more researchers bias and reliability become more controlled and increased. Also as observed in interventional observation the participant’s awareness of the researcher’s presence affects the experiment results of the observer. Another major problem in traditional research, which researchers are often perturbed with is the issues of reactivity. Arising from demand characteristics (behavior in accordance to research expectation) or social desirability (which involves presenting themselves in a way they think or look most appropriately acceptable) …show more content…
Moreso, traditional research when employed across population of various cultures appear to affect the external validity of the research, illustration drawn from European Caucasian sample demonstrates that one size does not fit all. Also in line with the assignment an observation and multicultural psychological are presented. In addition, comparison of these two variables in respect of multicultural and traditional research is also presented. An insight into some fundamental problems encountered by researchers in their bid to implementing variables cross-culturally as much as possible is

Related Documents